• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于选择耐旱草生态型的形态生理和产量性状

Morpho-physiological and yield traits for selection of drought tolerant grass ecotypes.

作者信息

Ochola Celestine Anyango, Ngugi Mathew Pierro, Nyaboga Evans N, Njarui Donald M G

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Biotechnology, Kenyatta University, P.O Box 43844-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.

Department of Biochemistry, University of Nairobi, P.O Box 30197-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.

出版信息

AoB Plants. 2024 Jun 6;16(3):plae034. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plae034. eCollection 2024 Jun.

DOI:10.1093/aobpla/plae034
PMID:38948321
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11212069/
Abstract

Drought has become more recurrent and causes a substantial decline in forage yields leading to strain on feed resources for livestock production. This has intensified the search for drought-tolerant forages to promote sustainable livestock production. The objective of this study was to identify drought-tolerant grasses and to discern their morpho-physiological and yield traits to water stress as well as the relationship between these traits and indices of drought resistance. The results showed that the ecotypes, water regimes and their interaction significantly influenced all the studied morpho-physiological and yield traits. There was a significant decrease in plant height, number of leaves and tillers, dry matter yield, relative water content, photosystem II and efficiency of photosystem II with an increase in non-photochemical quenching. The principal component analysis revealed that the performance of grass ecotypes was different under water sufficient (WS) and water deficit conditions. Drought tolerance indicators (mean productivity, geometric mean productivity, tolerance index and stress tolerance index) were most effective in identifying ecotypes with high biomass production under both water deficient and WS conditions. Ecotypes K17, K7, Kisii, Busia and Kakamega were the most drought tolerant, Basilisk, K6, K10, K19 and Toledo were moderately tolerant whereas, CIAT6385, CIAT16449, K13, K5 and K9 were drought sensitive. The five drought-tolerant ecotypes should be tested for sustainable biomass production under field conditions and used in breeding programmes to develop high-yielding drought-tolerant varieties.

摘要

干旱发生得越来越频繁,导致牧草产量大幅下降,给畜牧生产的饲料资源带来压力。这加剧了人们对耐旱牧草的寻找,以促进可持续畜牧生产。本研究的目的是鉴定耐旱草种,识别它们在水分胁迫下的形态生理和产量性状,以及这些性状与抗旱指标之间的关系。结果表明,生态型、水分状况及其相互作用对所有研究的形态生理和产量性状均有显著影响。随着非光化学猝灭的增加,株高、叶片数、分蘖数、干物质产量、相对含水量、光系统II和光系统II效率均显著下降。主成分分析表明,在水分充足(WS)和水分亏缺条件下,草种生态型的表现不同。耐旱指标(平均生产力、几何平均生产力、耐性指数和胁迫耐性指数)在识别水分亏缺和WS条件下具有高生物量产量的生态型时最为有效。生态型K17、K7、基苏木、布西亚和卡卡梅加最耐旱,巴西利斯克、K6、K10、K19和托莱多为中度耐旱,而CIAT6385、CIAT16449、K13、K5和K9对干旱敏感。这五个耐旱生态型应在田间条件下进行可持续生物量生产测试,并用于育种计划,以培育高产耐旱品种。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89df/11212069/79557a3bda8b/plae034_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89df/11212069/a7083c14aeaf/plae034_fig1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89df/11212069/c9b118619ea9/plae034_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89df/11212069/79557a3bda8b/plae034_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89df/11212069/a7083c14aeaf/plae034_fig1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89df/11212069/c9b118619ea9/plae034_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89df/11212069/79557a3bda8b/plae034_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Morpho-physiological and yield traits for selection of drought tolerant grass ecotypes.用于选择耐旱草生态型的形态生理和产量性状
AoB Plants. 2024 Jun 6;16(3):plae034. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plae034. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Selected Indices to Identify Water-Stress-Tolerant Tropical Forage Grasses.用于鉴定耐水分胁迫热带饲草的选定指标
Plants (Basel). 2022 Sep 19;11(18):2444. doi: 10.3390/plants11182444.
3
Genetic diversity for drought tolerance in the native forage grass and possible morpho-physiological mechanisms involved.本地饲草耐旱性的遗传多样性及相关的可能形态生理机制。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Aug 3;14:1235923. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1235923. eCollection 2023.
4
Evaluation of sesame ( L.) varieties for drought tolerance using agromorphological traits and drought tolerance indices.利用农艺性状和耐旱性指数评价芝麻( L.)品种的耐旱性。
PeerJ. 2024 Jan 31;12:e16840. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16840. eCollection 2024.
5
Correction to: Morpho-physiological and yield traits for selection of drought tolerant grass ecotypes.对《用于选择耐旱草生态型的形态生理和产量性状》的修正
AoB Plants. 2024 Oct 5;16(5):plae052. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plae052. eCollection 2024 Oct.
6
Genetic variation and response to selection of photosynthetic and forage characteristics in Kentucky bluegrass ( L.) ecotypes under drought conditions.干旱条件下草地早熟禾生态型光合与饲草特性的遗传变异及对选择的响应
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Nov 10;14:1239860. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1239860. eCollection 2023.
7
Determination of morpho-physiological and yield traits of maize inbred lines ( L.) under optimal and drought stress conditions.在最佳和干旱胁迫条件下测定玉米自交系的形态生理和产量性状。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jul 28;13:959203. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.959203. eCollection 2022.
8
Selection of M5 mutant lines of wheat ( L.) for agronomic traits and biomass allocation under drought stress and non-stressed conditions.在干旱胁迫和非胁迫条件下,对小麦(L.)的M5突变体系进行农艺性状和生物量分配的选择。
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Feb 14;15:1314014. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1314014. eCollection 2024.
9
Assessing the potential of native ecotypes of Poa pratensis L. for forage yield and phytochemical compositions under water deficit conditions.评估草地早熟禾乡土生态型在水分亏缺条件下的饲草产量和植物化学成分的潜力。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 21;12(1):1121. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05024-1.
10
Genetic Potential and Inheritance Patterns of Physiological, Agronomic and Quality Traits in Bread Wheat under Normal and Water Deficit Conditions.正常和水分亏缺条件下面包小麦生理、农艺和品质性状的遗传潜力及遗传模式
Plants (Basel). 2022 Mar 31;11(7):952. doi: 10.3390/plants11070952.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic variation and response to selection of photosynthetic and forage characteristics in Kentucky bluegrass ( L.) ecotypes under drought conditions.干旱条件下草地早熟禾生态型光合与饲草特性的遗传变异及对选择的响应
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Nov 10;14:1239860. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1239860. eCollection 2023.
2
The opportunity of using durum wheat landraces to tolerate drought stress: screening morpho-physiological components.利用硬粒小麦地方品种耐受干旱胁迫的机会:筛选形态生理成分。
AoB Plants. 2023 May 5;15(3):plad022. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plad022. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Morphology, photosynthetic physiology and biochemistry of nine herbaceous plants under water stress.
水分胁迫下九种草本植物的形态、光合生理与生物化学
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Mar 30;14:1147208. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1147208. eCollection 2023.
4
Changes in the Physiological and Morphometric Characteristics and Biomass Distribution of Forage Grasses Growing under Conditions of Drought and Silicon Application.干旱及施硅条件下生长的饲草生理和形态特征及生物量分配的变化
Plants (Basel). 2022 Dec 20;12(1):16. doi: 10.3390/plants12010016.
5
Selected Indices to Identify Water-Stress-Tolerant Tropical Forage Grasses.用于鉴定耐水分胁迫热带饲草的选定指标
Plants (Basel). 2022 Sep 19;11(18):2444. doi: 10.3390/plants11182444.
6
An Overview of the Genetics and Genomics of the Species Most Commonly Used in Pastures.牧场中最常用物种的遗传学和基因组学概述。
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Dec 13;12:770461. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.770461. eCollection 2021.
7
Abiotic stress responses in plants.植物中的非生物胁迫响应
Nat Rev Genet. 2022 Feb;23(2):104-119. doi: 10.1038/s41576-021-00413-0. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
8
Sustainable Development Goals and livestock systems.可持续发展目标与畜牧系统。
Rev Sci Tech. 2021 Aug;40(2):585-595. doi: 10.20506/rst.40.2.3247.
9
Dissection of Drought Tolerance in Upland Cotton Through Morpho-Physiological and Biochemical Traits at Seedling Stage.通过苗期形态生理和生化性状剖析陆地棉的耐旱性
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Mar 12;12:627107. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.627107. eCollection 2021.
10
Screening of Onion ( L.) Genotypes for Drought Tolerance Using Physiological and Yield Based Indices Through Multivariate Analysis.通过多变量分析,利用基于生理和产量的指标筛选洋葱(L.)基因型的耐旱性
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Feb 9;12:600371. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.600371. eCollection 2021.