Jehn U, Zittoun R, Löwenberg B
Onkologie. 1985 Jun;8(3):160-4. doi: 10.1159/000215646.
Twenty-five institutions are participating in the AML-6-trial designed to improve remission incidence and to delay the time of relapse. Therefore, an intensive cyclic therapy is employed early after achievement of remission using either the same drugs of the induction regimen or rotating combinations of alternative drugs, e.g. AMSA, 5-AZA and HD-araC. So far, 266 patients entered the trial. The overall C.R. rate is 71%. 58 patients are randomized to 'maintenance' arm I, 54 to arm II, 79/112 patients are still being studied. Toxicity was in 7% and 3% respectively a reason to interrupt the study during induction or 'maintenance'. Since the intensity of modern protocols for remission induction of AML presents a major problem in elderly patients due to toxicity, and since most studies indicate low remission rates with an increasing death rate in this age group, the AML-7-study was initiated to prospectively compare survival and quality of life of two different therapeutic strategies: immediate intensive remission induction versus supportive care, 'wait and see' policy, and palliative cytoreduction with hydroxyurea and ara C when necessary. During the first 8 months after activating this study, 27 patients entered, 13 were randomized to branch I, and 14 to branch II.
25家机构参与了旨在提高缓解率和延迟复发时间的AML-6试验。因此,在缓解达成后早期采用强化循环疗法,使用诱导方案中的相同药物或交替药物的轮换组合,例如安吖啶、5-氮杂胞苷和大剂量阿糖胞苷。到目前为止,266名患者进入了该试验。总体完全缓解率为71%。58名患者被随机分配到“维持”I组,54名到II组,79/112名患者仍在研究中。分别有7%和3%的患者因毒性在诱导期或“维持期”中断研究。由于AML现代缓解诱导方案的强度因毒性在老年患者中是一个主要问题,并且由于大多数研究表明该年龄组缓解率低且死亡率增加,因此启动了AML-7研究,以前瞻性比较两种不同治疗策略的生存率和生活质量:立即强化缓解诱导与支持性治疗、“观察等待”策略以及必要时用羟基脲和阿糖胞苷进行姑息性细胞减灭。在启动该研究后的前8个月,27名患者进入,13名被随机分配到I组,14名到II组。