Suppr超能文献

短期血流量限制在卧推时增加功率输出和棒速度。

Short-Term Blood Flow Restriction Increases Power Output and Bar Velocity During the Bench Press.

机构信息

Institute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.

School of P.E. and Sport Science, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece ; and.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Aug 1;36(8):2082-2088. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003649. Epub 2020 May 5.

Abstract

Wilk, M, Krzysztofik, M, Filip, A, Zajac, A, Bogdanis, GC, and Lockie, RG. Short-term blood flow restriction increases power output and bar velocity during the bench press. J Strength Cond Res 36(8): 2082-2088, 2022-This study examined the effect of blood flow restriction (BFR) with 2 different types of cuffs on peak power output (PP), mean power output (MP), peak bar velocity (PV), and mean bar velocity (MV) in the bench press exercise (BP). Fourteen healthy strength-trained male athletes (age = 27.6 ± 3.5 years; body mass = 84.1 ± 8.0 kg; height = 175.8 ± 6.7 cm; BP 1 repetition maximum [RM] = 138.6 ± 17.8 kg) performed 3 different testing protocols as follows: without BFR (NO-BFR), BFR with a narrow cuff (BFR NARROW ), and BFR with a wide cuff (BFR WIDE ) in a randomized crossover design. During all sessions, subjects performed one set of 3 repetitions of the BP exercise using 70% 1RM. Cuff pressure was set to approximately 90% full arterial occlusion pressure of the upper limb at rest. Analyses of variance showed an increase in PP (by 21%, p < 0.01; effect size [ES] = 1.67), MP (by 16%, p < 0.01; ES = 0.93), PV (by 22%, p < 0.01; ES = 1.79), and MV (by 21%, p < 0.01; ES = 1.36) during BFR WIDE compared with NO-BFR and a significant increase in PP (by 15%, p < 0.01; ES = 1.07), MP (by 17%, p < 0.01; ES = 0.78), PV (by 18%, p < 0.01; ES = 1.65), and MV (by 13% p < 0.01; ES = 1.00) during BFR WIDE compared with BFR NARROW . There were no significant differences in any of the variable between NO-BFR and BFR NARROW . The results of the study indicate that short-term BFR training increases power output and bar velocity during the BP exercise. However, only BFR WIDE significantly influenced bar velocity and power output, which indicates that the width of the cuff is a critical factor determining acute exercise adaptation during BFR resistance training.

摘要

威尔克、M、克日什托菲克、M、菲利普、A、扎亚克、A、博格达尼斯、GC 和洛克、RG。短期血流限制可增加卧推时的峰值功率输出和杠速度。J 力量与条件研究 36(8):2082-2088,2022-本研究检验了血流限制(BFR)两种不同类型袖带对卧推运动(BP)中峰值功率输出(PP)、平均功率输出(MP)、峰值杠速度(PV)和平均杠速度(MV)的影响。14 名健康的力量训练男性运动员(年龄=27.6±3.5 岁;体重=84.1±8.0 公斤;身高=175.8±6.7 厘米;BP 1 次重复最大[RM]=138.6±17.8 公斤)采用以下三种不同的测试方案进行随机交叉设计:无血流限制(NO-BFR)、窄袖带血流限制(BFR NARROW)和宽袖带血流限制(BFR WIDE)。在所有测试中,研究对象使用 70%的 1RM 进行 3 次重复的 BP 运动。袖带压力设定为上肢休息时接近动脉闭塞压的 90%。方差分析显示,与 NO-BFR 相比,BFR WIDE 时 PP(增加 21%,p<0.01;效应量[ES] = 1.67)、MP(增加 16%,p<0.01;ES = 0.93)、PV(增加 22%,p<0.01;ES = 1.79)和 MV(增加 21%,p<0.01;ES = 1.36)均增加,与 BFR NARROW 相比,BFR WIDE 时 PP(增加 15%,p<0.01;ES = 1.07)、MP(增加 17%,p<0.01;ES = 0.78)、PV(增加 18%,p<0.01;ES = 1.65)和 MV(增加 13%,p<0.01;ES = 1.00)也均增加。NO-BFR 和 BFR NARROW 之间在任何变量上均无显著差异。研究结果表明,短期 BFR 训练可增加 BP 运动时的功率输出和杠速度。然而,只有 BFR WIDE 显著影响杠速度和功率输出,这表明袖带的宽度是决定 BFR 抗阻训练中急性运动适应的关键因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验