Trybulski Robert, Gepfert Mariola, Gawel Dawid, Bichowska Marta, Fostiak Krzysztof, Wojdala Grzegorz, Trybek Grzegorz, Krzysztofik Michal, Wilk Michal
Department of Medical Sciences, The Wojciech Korfanty School of Economics, 40-065 Katowice, Poland.
Provita Zory Medical Center, 44-240 Zory, Poland.
Biol Sport. 2022 Sep;39(3):547-554. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2022.106160. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
The goal of the study was to determine the differences between volitional and maximal movement tempo during resistance exercise. Ten healthy men volunteered for the study (age = 26.4 ± 4.8 years; body mass = 93.8 ± 9.6 kg; barbell squat one-repetition maximum (1RM) = 175 ± 16.7 kg; bench press 1RM = 140.5 ± 26.8 kg). In a randomized order, the participants performed six sets of the barbell squat and the bench press exercise at progressive loads from 40% to 90%1RM (step by 10%) under two testing conditions: with volitional movement tempo or with maximal movement tempo. The three-way repeated measures ANOVA showed a statistically significant multi-interaction effect for time under tension (p < 0.001), peak bar velocity (p = 0.04) and for mean bar velocity (p < 0.001). There was also a statistically significant main effect of movement tempo for time under tension (p < 0.001), peak bar velocity (p < 0.001) and for mean bar velocity (p < 0.001). The post hoc analysis for main effect of tempo revealed that time under tension was significantly longer for volitional compared to maximal tempo (0.84 vs 0.67 s, respectively), peak bar velocity was significantly higher for maximal compared to volitional tempo (1.24 m/s vs 0.90 m/s, respectively), and mean bar velocity was significant higher for maximal compared to volitional tempo (0.84 m/s vs 0.67 m/s, respectively). The presented results indicate that there were significant differences between volitional and maximal movement tempos in time under tension and bar velocity (peak and mean), as well as significant differences in those variables between the two exercises. Therefore, the velocity of movement and time under tension is related to movement tempo, external load and type of exercise used.
本研究的目的是确定抗阻训练中自主运动节奏与最大运动节奏之间的差异。十名健康男性自愿参与本研究(年龄 = 26.4 ± 4.8岁;体重 = 93.8 ± 9.6千克;杠铃深蹲一次重复最大值(1RM) = 175 ± 16.7千克;卧推1RM = 140.5 ± 26.8千克)。参与者以随机顺序在两种测试条件下,即自主运动节奏或最大运动节奏下,进行六组杠铃深蹲和卧推练习,负荷从40%到90% 1RM逐步递增(每次递增10%)。三因素重复测量方差分析显示,在张力持续时间(p < 0.001)、杠铃峰值速度(p = 0.04)和杠铃平均速度(p < 0.001)方面存在统计学显著的多重交互作用。运动节奏在张力持续时间(p < 0.001)、杠铃峰值速度(p < 0.001)和杠铃平均速度(p < 0.001)方面也存在统计学显著的主效应。节奏主效应的事后分析表明,与最大节奏相比,自主节奏下的张力持续时间显著更长(分别为0.84秒和0.67秒),与自主节奏相比,最大节奏下的杠铃峰值速度显著更高(分别为1.24米/秒和0.90米/秒),与自主节奏相比,最大节奏下的杠铃平均速度显著更高(分别为0.84米/秒和0.67米/秒)。呈现的结果表明,自主运动节奏与最大运动节奏在张力持续时间和杠铃速度(峰值和平均)方面存在显著差异,并且这两种练习在这些变量上也存在显著差异。因此,运动速度和张力持续时间与运动节奏、外部负荷和所使用的练习类型有关。