• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

In vitro bond strength of treated direct-bonding metal bases.

作者信息

Siomka L V, Powers J M

出版信息

Am J Orthod. 1985 Aug;88(2):133-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(85)90237-4.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9416(85)90237-4
PMID:3895972
Abstract

Three types of direct-bonding metal bases were used to determine the effect of five commercial surface treatments on in vitro tensile bond strength. The proprietary treatments were etching, silanation, surface activation, etching plus silanation, and etching plus surface activation. Nontreatment was used as a control. The bases were of the mesh, photo-etched, and grooved types. Bases were loaded with a no-mix adhesive to plastic substrates. The grooved base had the highest bond strength with no treatment. Etching improved the bond strength of the grooved bracket by 56%. Silanation improved the bond strength of the mesh bracket by 28%. Surface treatments did not improve the bond strength of the photo-etched bracket.

摘要

相似文献

1
In vitro bond strength of treated direct-bonding metal bases.
Am J Orthod. 1985 Aug;88(2):133-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(85)90237-4.
2
Effectiveness of a method used in bonding resins to metal.一种用于使粘结树脂与金属结合的方法的有效性。
J Prosthet Dent. 1990 Jul;64(1):37-41. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90150-b.
3
Evaluation of fourteen direct-bonding orthodontic bases.十四种直接粘结正畸基底的评估。
Am J Orthod. 1980 Dec;78(6):630-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(80)90202-x.
4
Evaluation of the bond strength of different bracket-bonding systems to bovine enamel.不同托槽粘结系统与牛牙釉质粘结强度的评估。
Eur J Orthod. 1997 Jun;19(3):259-70. doi: 10.1093/ejo/19.3.259.
5
[The tensile bonding strength of metal plasma-coated bracket bases].[金属等离子涂层托槽基底的拉伸粘结强度]
Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1992 Jun;53(3):142-52. doi: 10.1007/BF02341449.
6
Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain.
J Dent Res. 1987 Sep;66(9):1460-5. doi: 10.1177/00220345870660091001.
7
Comparison of bond strengths of denture base resins to nickel-chromium-beryllium removable partial denture alloy.义齿基托树脂与镍铬铍可摘局部义齿合金结合强度的比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 1997 Dec;78(6):566-73. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(97)70007-6.
8
Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of etched-metal resin-bonded retainers.表面处理对酸蚀金属树脂粘结固位体粘结强度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 1985 Feb;53(2):185-90. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(85)90106-4.
9
Comparative evaluation of tensile bond strength of denture base resins to surface pretreated cobalt chromium base metal alloys--an in vitro study.
Indian J Dent Res. 2001 Jul-Sep;12(3):159-65.
10
Clinical comparison of direct versus indirect bonding with different bracket types and adhesives.不同托槽类型和黏合剂直接与间接黏接的临床比较
Am J Orthod. 1978 Jul;74(1):62-78. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(78)90046-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Bonding Surface Designs in Fixed Orthodontic Attachments.固定正畸矫治器的粘结面设计
Int J Dent. 2023 Jan 23;2023:2846879. doi: 10.1155/2023/2846879. eCollection 2023.
2
Priming and bonding metal, ceramic and polycarbonate brackets.金属、陶瓷和聚碳酸酯托槽的预处理与粘结
Biomater Investig Dent. 2019 Nov 6;6(1):61-72. doi: 10.1080/26415275.2019.1684823. eCollection 2019.
3
Periodontal ligament strain induced by different orthodontic bracket removal techniques: nonlinear finite-element comparison study.不同正畸托槽拆除技术引起的牙周膜应变:非线性有限元比较研究
J Orofac Orthop. 2014 Jul;75(4):287-98. doi: 10.1007/s00056-014-0219-7. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
4
Improvement in adhesion of the brackets to the tooth by sandblasting treatment.喷砂处理改善托槽与牙齿的黏附。
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012 Feb;23(2):605-11. doi: 10.1007/s10856-011-4509-y. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
5
[Improvement in the adhesive strength of orthodontic brackets on unit-cast and fired dental alloys by microsandblasting].
Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1995 Mar;56(2):110-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02310431.