识别交通事故现场死亡相关因素之间的相互作用:“逻辑回归”方法的应用。

Identifying interactions among factors related to death occurred at the scene of traffic accidents: Application of "logic regression" method.

作者信息

Jamali-Dolatabad Milad, Sadeghi-Bazargani Homayoun, Salemi Saman, Sarbakhsh Parvin

机构信息

Department of Statistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Road Traffic Injury Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Jun 5;10(11):e32469. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32469. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.

Abstract

AIM

Traffic accidents are caused by several interacting risk factors. This study aimed to investigate the interactions among risk factors associated with death at the accident scene (DATAS) as an indicator of the crash severity, for pedestrians, passengers, and drivers by adopting "Logic Regression" as a novel approach in the traffic field.

METHOD

A case-control study was designed based on the police data from the Road Traffic Injury Registry in northwest of Iran during 2014-2016. For each of the pedestrians, passengers, and drivers' datasets, logic regression with "logit" link function was fitted and interactions were identified using Annealing algorithm. Model selection was performed using the cross-validation and the null model randomization procedure.

RESULTS

regarding pedestrians, "The occurrence of the accident outside a city in a situation where there was insufficient light" (OR = 6.87, -value<0.001) and "the age over 65 years" (OR = 2.97, -value<0.001) increased the chance of DATAS "Accidents happening in residential inner-city areas with a light vehicle, and presence of the pedestrians in the safe zone or on the non-separate two-way road" combination lowered the chance of DATAS (OR = 0.14, -value<0.001). For passengers, "Accidents happening in outside the city or overturn of the vehicle" combination (OR = 8.55, -value<0.001), and "accidents happening on defective roads" (OR = 2.18, value<0.001) increased the odds of DATAS; When "driver was not injured or the vehicle was two-wheeled", chance of DATAS decreased for passengers (OR = 0.25, p-value<0.001). The odds of DATAS were higher for "drivers who had a head-on accident, or drove a two-wheeler vehicle, or overturned the vehicle" (OR = 4.03, P-value<0.001). "Accident on the roads other than runway or the absence of a multi-car accident or an accident in a non-residential area" (OR = 6.04, P-value<0.001), as well "the accident which occurred outside the city or on defective roads, and the drivers were male" had a higher risk of DATAS for drivers (OR = 5.40, P-value<0.001).

CONCLUSION

By focusing on identifying interaction effects among risk factors associated with DATAS through logic regression, this study contributes to the understanding of the complex nature of traffic accidents and the potential for reducing their occurrence rate or severity. According to the results, the simultaneous presence of some risk factors such as the quality of roads, skill of drivers, physical ability of pedestrians, and compliance with traffic rules play an important role in the severity of the accident. The revealed interactions have practical significance and can play a significant role in the problem-solving process and facilitate breaking the chain of combinations among the risk factors. Therefore, practical suggestions of this study are to control at least one of the risk factors present in each of the identified combinations in order to break the combination to reduce the severity of accidents. This may have, in turn, help the policy-makers, road users, and healthcare professionals to promote road safety through prioritizing interventions focusing on effect size of simultaneous coexistence of crash severity determinants and not just the main effects of single risk factors or their simple two-way interactions.

摘要

目的

交通事故由多种相互作用的风险因素导致。本研究旨在采用“逻辑回归”这一交通领域的新方法,调查与事故现场死亡(DATAS)相关的风险因素之间的相互作用,将其作为碰撞严重程度的指标,涉及行人、乘客和驾驶员。

方法

基于2014 - 2016年伊朗西北部道路交通伤害登记处的警方数据设计了一项病例对照研究。对于行人、乘客和驾驶员的每个数据集,拟合具有“logit”链接函数的逻辑回归,并使用退火算法识别相互作用。使用交叉验证和空模型随机化程序进行模型选择。

结果

关于行人,“在光线不足的情况下于城外发生事故”(OR = 6.87,p值<0.001)和“65岁以上年龄”(OR = 2.97,p值<0.001)增加了事故现场死亡的可能性;“在城市内住宅区域发生的轻型车辆事故,且行人在安全区域或非分隔双向道路上”这一组合降低了事故现场死亡的可能性(OR = 0.14,p值<0.001)。对于乘客,“在城外发生事故或车辆翻车”组合(OR = 8.55,p值<0.001)以及“在有缺陷的道路上发生事故”(OR = 2.18,p值<0.001)增加了事故现场死亡的几率;当“驾驶员未受伤或车辆为两轮车”时,乘客的事故现场死亡几率降低(OR = 0.25,p值<0.001)。“发生正面碰撞事故、驾驶两轮车辆或车辆翻车的士”事故现场死亡的几率更高(OR = 4.03,P值<0.001)。“在跑道以外的道路上发生事故、没有多车事故或在非住宅区域发生事故”(OR = 6.04,P值<0.001),以及“在城外或有缺陷的道路上发生事故且驾驶员为男性”的驾驶员发生事故现场死亡的风险更高(OR = 5.40,P值<0.001)。

结论

通过专注于通过逻辑回归识别与事故现场死亡相关的风险因素之间的相互作用效应,本研究有助于理解交通事故的复杂性质以及降低其发生率或严重程度的潜力。根据结果,一些风险因素的同时存在,如道路质量、驾驶员技能、行人身体能力以及遵守交通规则,在事故严重程度中起着重要作用。所揭示的相互作用具有实际意义,并且可以在解决问题的过程中发挥重要作用,并有助于打破风险因素之间的组合链条。因此,本研究的实际建议是控制每个已识别组合中存在的至少一个风险因素,以打破组合从而降低事故严重程度。这反过来可能有助于政策制定者、道路使用者和医疗保健专业人员通过优先进行干预来促进道路安全,这些干预侧重于碰撞严重程度决定因素同时共存的效应大小,而不仅仅是单个风险因素的主要效应或其简单的双向相互作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb0/11219356/3243236787ea/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索