• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字化背景下公共关系从业者的职业道德。

PROFESSIONAL ETHICS OF PUBLIC RELATIONS PRACTITIONERS IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITALIZATION.

机构信息

1Department of Social Work and Social Technologies, Yerevan State University, Armenia.

2Department of Applied Sociology, Yerevan State University, Armenia.

出版信息

Georgian Med News. 2024 Apr(349):80-84.

PMID:38963207
Abstract

In the ever-evolving landscape of public relations (PR), the significance of professional ethics has become increasingly pronounced, particularly in the digital age. This article embarks on a journey to synthesize the dynamic evolution of professional ethics in public relations and underscores the pressing need for its application in contemporary communication landscapes. Exploring the core values and principles that underpin ethical practices, the study extends to the alignment of these principles with fundamental human rights. A focal point of this article is an examination of the findings derived from research conducted among Armenian public relations practitioners, offering valuable insights into the challenges posed by the digital age. In this era of rapid digitalization, the traditional ethical codes that once governed the realm of public relations are facing unprecedented challenges. The classic ethical standards, while foundational, are now confronted with a shifting landscape shaped by the proliferation of social networks and online communication platforms. This article scrutinizes the practitioners' perspectives on the development of ethical standards, exploring questions of geographical and contextual relevance in the face of technological advancements. As the digital age transforms the dynamics of communication, the limitations of traditional PR ethics become increasingly apparent. The discussion highlights the intricacies of professional ethics within the realm of social networks, shedding light on the nuanced ethical considerations that emerge in this digitalized era. Amidst this exploration, a crucial issue emerges - the imperative for the preservation of ethical standards in public relations. The article contends that the challenges posed by digitalization necessitate a revision of the conventional PR ethical code. While the foundations remain relevant, there is a pressing need for an updated ethical framework that can effectively navigate the complex ethical terrain presented by social networks and digital communication channels. In conclusion, the article endeavors to provide a comprehensive understanding of the evolution of professional ethics in public relations, emphasizing the transformative impact of digitalization. By examining the standpoints of Armenian public relations practitioners, it sheds light on the challenges faced in this digital age and advocates for a proactive approach to adapt and enhance ethical standards in response to the dynamic communication landscape.

摘要

在不断发展的公共关系(PR)领域中,职业道德的重要性变得越来越突出,尤其是在数字时代。本文旨在综合探讨公共关系职业道德的动态演变,并强调其在当代传播环境中应用的紧迫性。通过探讨支撑道德实践的核心价值观和原则,本文进一步探讨了这些原则与基本人权的一致性。本文的重点是研究亚美尼亚公共关系从业者的研究结果,从中得出数字时代所面临挑战的宝贵见解。在这个快速数字化的时代,曾经规范公共关系领域的传统道德规范正面临前所未有的挑战。虽然经典的道德标准是基础,但现在它们正面临着由社交网络和在线交流平台的普及所塑造的不断变化的格局。本文深入探讨了从业者对道德标准发展的看法,探讨了在技术进步背景下地理和背景相关性的问题。随着数字时代改变了沟通的动态,传统 PR 道德的局限性变得越来越明显。讨论强调了道德标准在社交网络领域的复杂性,揭示了在这个数字化时代出现的微妙道德考虑因素。在这种探索中,出现了一个关键问题——在公共关系中维护道德标准的必要性。本文认为,数字化带来的挑战需要对传统的 PR 道德规范进行修订。虽然基础仍然相关,但迫切需要一个更新的道德框架,以有效地应对社交网络和数字通信渠道所带来的复杂道德领域。总之,本文旨在全面了解公共关系职业道德的演变,强调数字化的变革性影响。通过研究亚美尼亚公共关系从业者的观点,本文揭示了在这个数字时代所面临的挑战,并倡导采取积极主动的方法来适应和加强道德标准,以应对动态的沟通环境。

相似文献

1
PROFESSIONAL ETHICS OF PUBLIC RELATIONS PRACTITIONERS IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITALIZATION.数字化背景下公共关系从业者的职业道德。
Georgian Med News. 2024 Apr(349):80-84.
2
Current ethical and social issues in epidemiology.流行病学当前的伦理和社会问题。
Ann Epidemiol. 2023 Apr;80:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2023.02.001. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
3
Professional Ethics of Software Engineers: An Ethical Framework.软件工程师的职业道德:一种道德框架。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Apr;22(2):417-34. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9665-x. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
4
Developing ethical standards for responsible research: Why? Form? Functions? Process? Outcomes?制定负责任研究的伦理标准:为何?形式?功能?过程?结果?
J Dent Res. 1996 Feb;75(2):832-5. doi: 10.1177/00220345960750021601.
5
Toward a hermeneutic model of ethical decision making in clinical practice.迈向临床实践中伦理决策的诠释学模型。
Ethics Behav. 1997;7(4):347-65. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0704_6.
6
Exploring the ethics of political PR professionals using moral foundations theory.用道德基础理论探究政治公关专业人士的伦理道德。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 12;18(6):e0286217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286217. eCollection 2023.
7
Use of practice guidelines and position statements in ethical decision making.在伦理决策中使用实践指南和立场声明。
Am Psychol. 2019 Dec;74(9):1151-1162. doi: 10.1037/amp0000519.
8
Ethics of the profession of public relations--does the public relations affects on journalism in Croatia?公共关系职业伦理——公共关系对克罗地亚新闻业有影响吗?
Coll Antropol. 2013 Sep;37(3):685-90.
9
Exploring the ethical dimensions in forensic entomology: From codes of conduct to professional accountability.探索法医昆虫学中的伦理维度:从行为准则到专业问责制。
Sci Justice. 2024 Mar;64(2):243-249. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2024.02.003. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
10
A proposal for a code of ethics for nurse practitioners.一份关于执业护士道德规范的提案。
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2004 Mar;16(3):116-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2004.tb00382.x.