Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA; Department of Environmental Science, Policy, & Management and the School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Environ Int. 2024 Aug;190:108849. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108849. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
Between 52-86% of people who menstruate in the United States use tampons-cotton and/or rayon/viscose 'plugs'-to absorb menstrual blood in the vagina. Tampons may contain metals from agricultural or manufacturing processes, which could be absorbed by the vagina's highly absorptive tissue, resulting in systemic exposure. To our knowledge, no previous studies have measured metals in tampons.
We evaluated the concentrations of 16 metal(loid)s in 30 tampons from 14 tampon brands and 18 product lines and compared the concentrations by tampon characteristics.
About 0.2 - 0.3 g from each tampon (n = 60 samples) were microwave-acid digested and analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) to determine concentrations of arsenic, barium, calcium, cadmium, cobalt, chromium, copper, iron, manganese, mercury, nickel, lead, selenium, strontium, vanadium, and zinc. We compared concentrations by several tampon characteristics (region of purchase, organic material, brand type) using median quantile mixed models.
We found measurable concentrations of all 16 metals assessed. We detected concentrations of several toxic metals, including elevated mean concentrations of lead (geometric mean [GM] = 120 ng/g), cadmium (GM = 6.74 ng/g), and arsenic (GM = 2.56 ng/g). Metal concentrations differed by region of tampon purchase (US versus European Union/United Kingdom), by organic versus non-organic material, and for store- versus name-brand tampons. Most metals differed by organic status; lead concentrations were higher in non-organic tampons while arsenic was higher in organic tampons. No categoriy had consistently lower concentrations of all or most metals.
Tampon use is a potential source of metal exposure. We detected all 16 metals in at least one sampled tampon, including some toxic metals like lead that has no "safe" exposure level. Future research is needed to replicate our findings and determine whether metals can leach out of tampons and cross the vaginal epithelium into systemic circulation.
在美国,有 52-86%的经期女性使用棉条或人造纤维/粘胶“塞子”来吸收阴道内的月经血。棉条可能含有来自农业或制造过程的金属,这些金属可能被阴道高度吸收的组织吸收,导致全身暴露。据我们所知,以前没有研究测量过棉条中的金属。
我们评估了 14 个棉条品牌和 18 个产品线上的 30 个棉条中 16 种金属(类金属)的浓度,并根据棉条特性比较了浓度。
每个棉条(n=60 个样本)约 0.2-0.3g 用微波酸消解,电感耦合等离子体质谱(ICP-MS)分析,测定砷、钡、钙、镉、钴、铬、铜、铁、锰、汞、镍、铅、硒、锶、钒和锌的浓度。我们使用中位数分位数混合模型比较了几种棉条特性(购买地区、有机材料、品牌类型)的浓度。
我们发现所有 16 种金属都有可测量的浓度。我们检测到几种有毒金属的浓度,包括铅(几何均值 [GM] = 120ng/g)、镉(GM = 6.74ng/g)和砷(GM = 2.56ng/g)的平均浓度升高。金属浓度因棉条购买地区(美国与欧盟/英国)、有机与非有机材料以及商店与品牌棉条而有所不同。大多数金属因有机状态而异;非有机棉条中的铅浓度较高,而有机棉条中的砷浓度较高。没有一类棉条的所有或大多数金属浓度始终较低。
使用棉条可能是金属暴露的一个潜在来源。我们在至少一个采样棉条中检测到了所有 16 种金属,包括一些有毒金属,如铅,它没有“安全”的暴露水平。需要进一步研究来复制我们的发现,并确定金属是否可以从棉条中浸出并穿过阴道上皮进入全身循环。