• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学龄前视力筛查后的眼部护理:来自新西兰成长研究的数据。

Eye care following pre-school vision screening: Data from the Growing Up in New Zealand study.

作者信息

Findlay Rebecca W, Anstice Nicola S, Black Joanna M, Grant Cameron C, Chelimo Carol

机构信息

School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Science, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

J Paediatr Child Health. 2024 Sep;60(9):436-442. doi: 10.1111/jpc.16613. Epub 2024 Jul 4.

DOI:10.1111/jpc.16613
PMID:38965736
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11656661/
Abstract

AIM

This study aimed to determine adherence with follow-up from the New Zealand pre-school vision screening programme. The study also examined associations between pre-school vision screening outcomes and cognitive measures assessed at the 54-month follow-up in the Growing Up in New Zealand study cohort.

METHODS

A cross-sectional retrospective record review of pre-school vision screening outcomes and hospital ophthalmology records with linkage to Growing Up in New Zealand cohort study data.

RESULTS

Of 176 children referred from vision screening, 21.6% did not attend a referral appointment. Of 138 children who attended a referral appointment, 21.0% did not attend one or more follow-up appointments. Ethnic differences were observed in attendance at referral appointments (attended Māori 13%, Pacific 22.5%, European/Other 64.5%; not attended Māori 26.3%, Pacific 28.9%, European/Other 44.7%; P = 0.04) and follow-up appointments (attended Māori 11.9%, Pacific 15.6%, European/Other 72.5%; not attended Māori 17.2%, Pacific 48.3%, European/Other 34.5%; P = 0.001). Vision screening outcome was significantly associated with letter naming fluency scores (P = 0.01) but not name and numbers scores (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-attendance at referral and follow-up appointments limits the efficacy of vision screening, particularly for children of Māori and Pacific ethnicity. Children referred from vision screening achieve lower scores on letter naming fluency, a key predictor of reading ability in later childhood. Equity-based improvements are required to ensure that all children referred from vision screening receive appropriate follow-up eye care.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定新西兰学前视力筛查项目的随访依从性。该研究还在“新西兰成长”研究队列中,考察了学前视力筛查结果与54个月随访时评估的认知指标之间的关联。

方法

对学前视力筛查结果和医院眼科记录进行横断面回顾性记录审查,并与“新西兰成长”队列研究数据相联系。

结果

在176名经视力筛查转诊的儿童中,21.6%未参加转诊预约。在138名参加了转诊预约的儿童中,21.0%未参加一次或多次后续预约。在转诊预约的出席情况(出席的毛利人占13%,太平洋岛民占22.5%,欧洲/其他族裔占64.5%;未出席的毛利人占26.3%,太平洋岛民占28.9%,欧洲/其他族裔占44.7%;P = 0.04)和后续预约的出席情况(出席的毛利人占11.9%,太平洋岛民占15.6%,欧洲/其他族裔占72.5%;未出席的毛利人占17.2%,太平洋岛民占48.3%,欧洲/其他族裔占34.5%;P = 0.001)方面观察到种族差异。视力筛查结果与字母命名流畅性得分显著相关(P = 0.01),但与姓名和数字得分无关(P = 0.05)。

结论

不参加转诊和后续预约限制了视力筛查的效果,尤其是对毛利族和太平洋岛民儿童。经视力筛查转诊的儿童在字母命名流畅性方面得分较低,而字母命名流畅性是儿童后期阅读能力的关键预测指标。需要基于公平性进行改进,以确保所有经视力筛查转诊的儿童都能获得适当的后续眼部护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b94/11656661/698514b9f4ae/JPC-60-436-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b94/11656661/84d5edacf563/JPC-60-436-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b94/11656661/fbf7da496d84/JPC-60-436-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b94/11656661/698514b9f4ae/JPC-60-436-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b94/11656661/84d5edacf563/JPC-60-436-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b94/11656661/fbf7da496d84/JPC-60-436-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b94/11656661/698514b9f4ae/JPC-60-436-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Eye care following pre-school vision screening: Data from the Growing Up in New Zealand study.学龄前视力筛查后的眼部护理:来自新西兰成长研究的数据。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2024 Sep;60(9):436-442. doi: 10.1111/jpc.16613. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
2
School dental screening programmes for oral health.学校口腔健康筛查计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 27;7(7):CD012595. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012595.pub4.
3
Vision screening for correctable visual acuity deficits in school-age children and adolescents.对学龄儿童和青少年进行可矫正视力缺陷的视力筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 15;2(2):CD005023. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005023.pub3.
4
Effect of ethnicity and other sociodemographic factors on attendance at ophthalmology appointments following referral from a Diabetic Eye Screening Programme: a retrospective cohort study.种族及其他社会人口学因素对糖尿病眼病筛查项目转诊后眼科门诊就诊率的影响:一项回顾性队列研究
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan 22;10(1):e001969. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001969.
5
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
6
Deworming drugs for soil-transmitted intestinal worms in children: effects on nutritional indicators, haemoglobin and school performance.儿童肠道土源性蠕虫驱虫药物:对营养指标、血红蛋白及学业表现的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11(7):CD000371. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000371.pub4.
7
Deworming drugs for soil-transmitted intestinal worms in children: effects on nutritional indicators, haemoglobin and school performance.儿童肠道土源性蠕虫驱虫药物:对营养指标、血红蛋白及学习成绩的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD000371. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000371.pub5.
8
Parent training interventions for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children aged 5 to 18 years.针对5至18岁儿童注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的家长培训干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7;2011(12):CD003018. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003018.pub3.
9
School dental screening programmes for oral health.学校口腔健康筛查项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 21;12(12):CD012595. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012595.pub2.
10
Community screening for visual impairment in older people.老年人视力障碍的社区筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 20;2(2):CD001054. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001054.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Vision screening in New Zealand pre-school children: Is it equitable?新西兰学龄前儿童视力筛查:公平吗?
J Paediatr Child Health. 2021 Oct;57(10):1594-1599. doi: 10.1111/jpc.15548. Epub 2021 May 10.
2
Do reduced visual acuity and refractive error affect classroom performance?视力下降和屈光不正是否会影响课堂表现?
Clin Exp Optom. 2020 May;103(3):278-289. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12953. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
3
Vision screening in New Zealand: an audit of the B4 School Check.新西兰的视力筛查:对“入学前检查”的审核
N Z Med J. 2019 Mar 8;132(1491):63-70.
4
Caregiver experiences of racism and child healthcare utilisation: cross-sectional analysis from New Zealand.照顾者经历种族主义和儿童医疗保健利用:来自新西兰的横断面分析。
Arch Dis Child. 2018 Sep;103(9):873-879. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313866. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
5
Achieving health equity in Aotearoa: strengthening responsiveness to Māori in health research.在奥特亚罗瓦实现健康公平:加强健康研究中对毛利人的响应能力。
N Z Med J. 2017 Nov 10;130(1465):96-103.
6
Value of Routine Eye Examinations in Asymptomatic Patients.无症状患者常规眼部检查的价值
Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Jul;93(7):660-6. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000863.
7
Preschool children's vision screening in New Zealand: a retrospective evaluation of referral accuracy.新西兰学龄前儿童视力筛查:转诊准确性的回顾性评估
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 27;5(11):e009207. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009207.
8
Are there inequities in the utilisation of childhood eye-care services in relation to socio-economic status? Evidence from the ALSPAC cohort.儿童眼保健服务的利用在社会经济地位方面是否存在不平等?来自阿冯纵向父母与儿童研究队列的证据。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2008 Jul;92(7):965-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.134841. Epub 2008 May 14.
9
Amblyopia.弱视
Lancet. 2006 Apr 22;367(9519):1343-51. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68581-4.
10
Refractive Error Study in Children: sampling and measurement methods for a multi-country survey.儿童屈光不正研究:多国调查的抽样与测量方法
Am J Ophthalmol. 2000 Apr;129(4):421-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00455-9.