Department of Health and Exercise Science, Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ, USA.
Department of Health and Exercise Science, Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ, USA -
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2024 Nov;64(11):1157-1164. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.24.16058-6. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
Blood flow restriction (BFR) has been shown to enhance the effectiveness of low load resistance exercise, but less research has examined its utility in conjunction with maximal isokinetic contractions, which may depend on the restrictive pressure and speed of contraction.
Individuals reported to the laboratory for three visits to complete three sets of 20 maximal elbow flexion exercises at 60°/s and 300°/s under 0%, 40% and 80% of their arterial occlusion pressure. Muscle thickness was measured before and after exercise, and ratings of discomfort, perceived activation, and exercise-induced feelings were obtained at the completion of each exercise. Fatigue was assessed as the decline in average peak torque across the three sets.
A total of 27 individuals (11 females, 16 males) completed the study. There was a significant interaction for torque at both 60°/s and 300°/s (P<0.001), with each increasing pressure resulting in greater fatigue. Muscle swelling was present across all conditions but was lowest in the 40% BFR condition applied during the 300°/s speed. At both 60°/s and 300°/s speeds, the 80% BFR pressure was associated with lower enjoyment, greater discomfort, and greater perceived activation (all P<0.05).
The combined effects of BFR to maximal isokinetic contractions increased fatigue with less of an impact on muscle swelling. These results indicate that BFR may enhance the effectiveness of long-term isokinetic training, but it is also important to consider the addition of BFR was associated with lower levels of enjoyment and greater discomfort which may decrease adherence.
血流限制(BFR)已被证明可以提高低负荷抗阻运动的效果,但较少的研究检查了其与最大等速收缩的结合使用,这可能取决于限制压力和收缩速度。
个体到实验室进行三次访问,以完成三组 20 次最大肘部伸展运动,速度为 60°/s 和 300°/s,分别施加 0%、40%和 80%的动脉闭塞压力。运动前后测量肌肉厚度,并在每组运动完成后获得不适感、感知激活和运动引起的感觉的评分。疲劳评估为三组运动中平均峰值扭矩的下降。
共有 27 人(11 名女性,16 名男性)完成了研究。在 60°/s 和 300°/s 时扭矩都存在显著的交互作用(P<0.001),施加的压力每增加一次,疲劳程度就会增加。在所有条件下都存在肌肉肿胀,但在施加 300°/s 速度的 40%BFR 条件下肿胀最小。在 60°/s 和 300°/s 速度下,80%BFR 压力与较低的享受度、更大的不适感和更大的感知激活相关(均 P<0.05)。
BFR 对最大等速收缩的综合影响增加了疲劳,但对肌肉肿胀的影响较小。这些结果表明,BFR 可能会增强长期等速训练的效果,但也需要考虑到添加 BFR 会导致享受度降低和不适感增加,从而可能降低依从性。