Suppr超能文献

替诺昔康与吡罗昔康治疗骨关节炎患者的双盲平行研究。

A double-blind, parallel study of tenoxicam and piroxicam in patients with osteoarthrosis.

作者信息

Bird H A, Hill J, Dixon J S, Looi D, Wright V

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 1985;9(8):529-35. doi: 10.1185/03007998509109630.

Abstract

A double-blind, parallel group study was carried out in 30 patients with osteoarthrosis to compare the efficacy and tolerance of tenoxicam (40 mg/day) and piroxicam (40 mg/day) given over a period of 4 weeks. All had previously been treated with a variety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents and/or analgesics. Patients were allocated at random to one or other treatment group. Clinical and laboratory assessments were made on entry and after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment. The results showed that both drugs improved general pain, the improvement being somewhat greater with tenoxicam. Little change was noted in other symptoms with either treatment. Side-effects reported were mainly gastro-intestinal. Six of the 15 piroxicam-treated patients stopped treatment because of adverse reactions, 1 because of treatment failure and 1 because he preferred previous treatment. Three of the 15 tenoxicam-treated patients discontinued because of adverse reactions. The remaining patients (7 on piroxicam and 12 on tenoxicam) elected at the end of the trial period to remain on their respective treatment instead of their previous medication.

摘要

对30例骨关节炎患者进行了一项双盲平行组研究,以比较替诺昔康(40毫克/天)和吡罗昔康(40毫克/天)在4周内的疗效和耐受性。所有患者此前均接受过多种非甾体抗炎药和/或镇痛药治疗。患者被随机分配到一个或另一个治疗组。在治疗开始时以及治疗2周和4周后进行临床和实验室评估。结果显示,两种药物均能改善总体疼痛,替诺昔康的改善程度略大。两种治疗方法在其他症状方面均未见明显变化。报告的副作用主要为胃肠道反应。15例接受吡罗昔康治疗的患者中有6例因不良反应停止治疗,1例因治疗失败停止治疗,1例因更喜欢之前的治疗方法停止治疗。15例接受替诺昔康治疗的患者中有3例因不良反应停药。其余患者(7例接受吡罗昔康治疗,12例接受替诺昔康治疗)在试验期结束时选择继续使用各自的治疗药物,而不是之前的药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验