Suppr超能文献

“Osmosin”与吡罗昔康的临床评估。

Clinical evaluation of 'Osmosin' versus piroxicam.

作者信息

Gallacchi G, Strolz F

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 1983;8 Suppl 2:83-9. doi: 10.1185/03007998309109827.

Abstract

A single-blind, randomized trial was carried out in 30 out-patients with osteoarthritis to compare the efficacy and tolerability of the new osmotic-release formulation, 'Osmosin' (7 mg indomethacin per hour over a period of approximately 10 hours), with that of piroxicam. Patients received a single dose of one 'Osmosin' or 20 mg piroxicam per day for 4 weeks. The results of objective and subjective assessments of disease symptoms showed that both treatments produced statistically significant improvements from baseline and no significant differences between the groups were observed. Three patients in the piroxicam group experienced moderate to severe gastro-intestinal problems and 1 patient dropped out after 2 weeks because of lack of efficacy. No side-effects were reported in the group on 'Osmosin' and all 15 patients completed the study. Data on the incidence of indomethacin-related side-effects from two open multi-centre studies involving large numbers of patients with osteoarthritis are discussed.

摘要

对30名骨关节炎门诊患者进行了一项单盲随机试验,以比较新型渗透释放制剂“Osmosin”(每小时释放7毫克吲哚美辛,持续约10小时)与吡罗昔康的疗效和耐受性。患者每天接受一剂“Osmosin”或20毫克吡罗昔康,持续4周。对疾病症状的客观和主观评估结果表明,两种治疗方法均使病情较基线水平有统计学意义的改善,且两组之间未观察到显著差异。吡罗昔康组有3名患者出现中度至重度胃肠道问题,1名患者因疗效不佳在2周后退出研究。“Osmosin”组未报告副作用,所有15名患者均完成了研究。文中还讨论了两项涉及大量骨关节炎患者的开放性多中心研究中吲哚美辛相关副作用发生率的数据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验