• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在糖尿病护理背景下测量电子健康素养:糖尿病特定条件下电子健康素养量表的波斯语版本的心理计量学评估。

Measuring electronic health literacy in the context of diabetes care: psychometric evaluation of a Persian version of the condition-specific eHealth literacy scale for diabetes.

机构信息

Diabetes Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, No. 10, Al-e-Ahmad and Chamran Highway Intersection, Tehran, 1411713136, Iran.

Health Information Technology Department, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Urmia Medical Sciences University, Urmia, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Jul 5;24(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02594-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-024-02594-0
PMID:38970044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11225123/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The rise of the internet and social media has led to increased interest among diabetes patients in using technology for information gathering and disease management. However, adequate eHealth literacy is crucial for protecting patients from unreliable diabetes-related information online.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the psychometric characteristics and explore the preliminary validity of the Persian version of the Condition-specific eHealth Literacy Scale for Diabetes (Persian CeHLS-D) to assess eHealth literacy in the context of diabetes care.

METHODS

After adapting, translating, examining content validity, and pilot testing the questionnaire, it was administered to 300 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Construct validity was assessed through confirmatory factor analysis, convergent and known-groups validity. The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), composite reliability and maximum reliability, and test-retest correlation were assessed.

RESULTS

Factor analysis supported the hypothesized two-factor model with 10 items, and the standardized factor loadings ranged from 0.44 to 0.86 (P-values < 0.001). Cronbach's alpha and test-retest correlation were good for each factor. Convergent validity was confirmed by significant correlations of Persian CeHLS-D with diabetes health literacy, perceived usefulness and importance of using the internet for health information, internet anxiety, and perceived physical and mental health. Know-groups validity determined using groups with different internet-use frequencies, and different attitudes towards providing online healthcare services, were satisfied.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the Persian CeHLS-D as a reliable and valid measure of eHealth literacy among patients with T2DM in Iran. Its satisfactory psychometric properties support its use in research and clinical settings to assess eHealth literacy and inform interventions.

摘要

背景

互联网和社交媒体的兴起,使得糖尿病患者对利用技术获取信息和管理疾病的兴趣大增。然而,足够的电子健康素养对于保护患者免受网络上不可靠的糖尿病相关信息至关重要。

目的

旨在检验条件特定电子健康素养量表-糖尿病(Persian CeHLS-D)的心理测量学特征,并探讨其在糖尿病护理背景下评估电子健康素养的初步有效性。

方法

对问卷进行适应性改编、翻译、内容效度检验和预试验后,对 300 例 2 型糖尿病患者进行调查。采用验证性因子分析评估结构效度,同时评估聚合效度和已知组有效性。评估内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha)、综合可靠性和最大可靠性以及测试-重测相关性。

结果

因子分析支持具有 10 个项目的假设两因素模型,标准化因子负荷范围为 0.44 至 0.86(P 值均<0.001)。每个因子的 Cronbach's alpha 和测试-重测相关性均良好。聚合效度通过 Persian CeHLS-D 与糖尿病健康素养、感知互联网在获取健康信息方面的有用性和重要性、互联网焦虑以及感知身心健康的显著相关性得到证实。采用不同互联网使用频率和对提供在线医疗服务的不同态度的分组进行了知组有效性验证,结果均令人满意。

结论

本研究表明,在伊朗 2 型糖尿病患者中,Persian CeHLS-D 是一种可靠且有效的电子健康素养测量工具。其满意的心理测量学特性支持其在研究和临床环境中用于评估电子健康素养并为干预措施提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8036/11225123/6d4aa53d180e/12911_2024_2594_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8036/11225123/b271b821e164/12911_2024_2594_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8036/11225123/6d4aa53d180e/12911_2024_2594_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8036/11225123/b271b821e164/12911_2024_2594_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8036/11225123/6d4aa53d180e/12911_2024_2594_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring electronic health literacy in the context of diabetes care: psychometric evaluation of a Persian version of the condition-specific eHealth literacy scale for diabetes.在糖尿病护理背景下测量电子健康素养:糖尿病特定条件下电子健康素养量表的波斯语版本的心理计量学评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Jul 5;24(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02594-0.
2
Psychometric Properties of the Norwegian Version of the Electronic Health Literacy Scale (eHEALS) Among Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Cross-Sectional Validation Study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后患者中挪威版电子健康素养量表(eHEALS)的心理测量学特性:横断面验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 28;22(7):e17312. doi: 10.2196/17312.
3
Development and psychometric evaluation of a new brief scale to measure eHealth literacy in people with type 2 diabetes.一种用于测量2型糖尿病患者电子健康素养的新型简短量表的开发与心理测量学评估。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Nov 4;21(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01062-2.
4
Psychometric validation of the Chinese digital health literacy instrument among Chinese older adults who have internet use experience.具有网络使用经验的中国老年人数字健康素养工具的心理计量学验证。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2024 Jan;19(1):e12568. doi: 10.1111/opn.12568. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
5
Electronic Health Literacy Scale-Web3.0 for Older Adults with Noncommunicable Diseases: Validation Study.电子健康素养量表-Web3.0 版:用于患有非传染性疾病的老年人的验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 3;26:e52457. doi: 10.2196/52457.
6
Measuring Electronic Health Literacy: Development, Validation, and Test of Measurement Invariance of a Revised German Version of the eHealth Literacy Scale.测量电子健康素养:电子健康素养量表修订版的德国版本的开发、验证和测量不变性测试。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 2;24(2):e28252. doi: 10.2196/28252.
7
Measuring a Broad Spectrum of eHealth Skills in the Web 3.0 Context Using an eHealth Literacy Scale: Development and Validation Study.在 Web 3.0 背景下使用电子健康素养量表衡量广泛的电子健康技能:开发和验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 23;23(9):e31627. doi: 10.2196/31627.
8
Validity and reliability testing of the Indonesian version of the eHealth Literacy Scale during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,对印尼版电子健康素养量表进行有效性和可靠性测试。
Health Informatics J. 2021 Jan-Mar;27(1):1460458220975466. doi: 10.1177/1460458220975466.
9
Psychometric Validation and Cultural Adaptation of the Simplified Chinese eHealth Literacy Scale: Cross-Sectional Study.《简化版电子健康素养量表的心理测量学验证和文化适应性:横断面研究》
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 7;22(12):e18613. doi: 10.2196/18613.
10
Validity Evidence of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) Part 2: Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluate Test Content, Response Process, and Internal Structure in the Australian Community Health Setting.电子健康素养问卷(eHLQ)第二部分的有效性证据:在澳大利亚社区卫生环境中评估测试内容、反应过程和内部结构的混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 8;24(3):e32777. doi: 10.2196/32777.

本文引用的文献

1
Newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes - does New Zealand General Practice adequately prepare patients to self-manage their Condition?新诊断的 2 型糖尿病——新西兰全科医生是否充分使患者做好自我管理病情的准备?
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Aug 21;24(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02118-1.
2
The effect of personalized intelligent digital systems for self-care training on type II diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.个性化智能数字系统对自我护理训练对 2 型糖尿病的影响:临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Diabetol. 2023 Dec;60(12):1599-1631. doi: 10.1007/s00592-023-02133-9. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
3
Inequalities in the prevalence, diagnosis awareness, treatment coverage and effective control of diabetes: a small area estimation analysis in Iran.
伊朗糖尿病患病率、诊断知晓率、治疗覆盖率和有效控制率的不平等:小区域估计分析。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2023 Jan 18;23(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12902-023-01271-z.
4
Development and psychometric evaluation of a new brief scale to measure eHealth literacy in people with type 2 diabetes.一种用于测量2型糖尿病患者电子健康素养的新型简短量表的开发与心理测量学评估。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Nov 4;21(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01062-2.
5
Psychometric properties of Persian version of diabetes health literacy scale (DHLS) in patients with type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病患者中糖尿病健康素养量表(DHLS)波斯语版本的心理测量特性。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022 Sep 27;14(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13098-022-00910-0.
6
eHealth literacy measurement tools: a systematic review protocol.电子健康素养测评工具:系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 24;11(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02076-2.
7
Disparity and Factors Associated With Internet Health Information Seeking Among US Adults Living With Diabetes Mellitus: Cross-sectional Study.美国糖尿病患者互联网健康信息寻求的差异及相关因素:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 30;24(5):e32723. doi: 10.2196/32723.
8
Validating the Digital Health Literacy Instrument in Relation to COVID-19 Information (COVID-DHL-K) among South Korean Undergraduates.验证与 COVID-19 信息相关的数字健康素养工具(COVID-DHL-K)在韩国大学生中的应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 14;19(6):3437. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063437.
9
Measuring Electronic Health Literacy: Development, Validation, and Test of Measurement Invariance of a Revised German Version of the eHealth Literacy Scale.测量电子健康素养:电子健康素养量表修订版的德国版本的开发、验证和测量不变性测试。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 2;24(2):e28252. doi: 10.2196/28252.
10
Use of Health Information Technology by Adults With Diabetes in the United States: Cross-sectional Analysis of National Health Interview Survey Data (2016-2018).美国糖尿病成年人使用健康信息技术情况:基于国家健康访谈调查数据(2016 - 2018年)的横断面分析
JMIR Diabetes. 2022 Jan 12;7(1):e27220. doi: 10.2196/27220.