• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动态再血管化以提高医疗系统的利用率。

Dynamic resectorization to improve utility of healthcare systems.

机构信息

Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Católica Porto Business School, Centro de Estudos em Gestão e Economia, Porto, Portugal.

SDA Bocconi, School of Management, Milano, Italy.

出版信息

J Health Popul Nutr. 2024 Jul 5;43(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s41043-024-00594-4.

DOI:10.1186/s41043-024-00594-4
PMID:38970138
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11229025/
Abstract

Balancing is an essential challenge in healthcare systems that requires effective strategies. This study aims to address this crucial issue by suggesting a practical approach. We show the potential of balancing a regional healthcare system to improve its utility. We consider a regional healthcare system comprising multiple hospitals with different sizes, capacities, quality of service, and accessibility. We define a utility function for the system based on the sectorization concept, which endeavors to form a balance between hospitals in terms of essential outputs such as waiting times and demands. The dynamic nature of the system means that this balance degrades over time, necessitating periodic sectorization, which is called resectorization. Our methodology stands out for incorporating resectorization as a dynamic strategy, enabling more flexible and responsive adaptations to continuously changing healthcare needs. Unlike previous studies, based on a system-oriented approach, our resectorization scenarios include the periodic closure of some hospitals. This enables us to enhance both the capacity and quality of healthcare facilities. Furthermore, in contrast to other studies, we investigate the states of diminishing demand throughout the resectorization process. To provide empirical insights, we conduct a simulation using data from a real-world case study. Our analysis spans multiple time periods, enabling us to dynamically quantify the utility of the healthcare system. The numerical findings demonstrate that substantial utility improvements are attainable through the defined scenarios. The study suggests a practical solution to the critical challenge of balancing issues in regional healthcare systems.

摘要

平衡是医疗保健系统中的一个基本挑战,需要有效的策略。本研究旨在通过提出一种实用的方法来解决这个关键问题。我们展示了平衡区域医疗保健系统以提高其效用的潜力。我们考虑了一个由多个具有不同规模、容量、服务质量和可及性的医院组成的区域医疗保健系统。我们基于分区化概念为系统定义了一个效用函数,该概念旨在根据等待时间和需求等基本产出在医院之间形成平衡。系统的动态性质意味着这种平衡会随着时间的推移而恶化,因此需要定期分区化,即重新分区。我们的方法的突出特点是将重新分区作为一种动态策略,能够更灵活和响应地适应不断变化的医疗保健需求。与基于系统导向的方法的先前研究不同,我们的重新分区方案包括定期关闭一些医院。这使我们能够提高医疗设施的容量和质量。此外,与其他研究不同,我们在重新分区过程中研究了需求减少的状态。为了提供实证见解,我们使用来自实际案例研究的数据进行了模拟。我们的分析跨越多个时间段,使我们能够动态量化医疗保健系统的效用。数值结果表明,通过定义的方案可以实现可观的效用改进。该研究为平衡区域医疗保健系统中的问题提供了一种实用的解决方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac7c/11229025/c0ce49547bc8/41043_2024_594_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac7c/11229025/bad98aa6f1d1/41043_2024_594_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac7c/11229025/c0ce49547bc8/41043_2024_594_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac7c/11229025/bad98aa6f1d1/41043_2024_594_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac7c/11229025/c0ce49547bc8/41043_2024_594_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Dynamic resectorization to improve utility of healthcare systems.动态再血管化以提高医疗系统的利用率。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2024 Jul 5;43(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s41043-024-00594-4.
2
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
3
On the sectorization of psychiatric services.论精神科服务的部门划分
Psychiatriki. 2025 Apr 7;36(1):13-16. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2025.005. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
4
Queueing for healthcare.排队看医。
J Med Syst. 2012 Apr;36(2):541-7. doi: 10.1007/s10916-010-9499-7. Epub 2010 May 8.
5
Developing an efficient scheduling template of a chemotherapy treatment unit: A case study.制定化疗治疗单元的高效排班模板:一项案例研究。
Australas Med J. 2011;4(10):575-88. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2011.837. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Japan as the front-runner of super-aged societies: Perspectives from medicine and medical care in Japan.日本作为超老龄化社会的领跑者:来自日本医学与医疗护理的视角
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Jun;15(6):673-87. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12450. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
8
What should the government do regarding health policy-making to develop community health care in Shanghai?政府应该在制定健康政策方面采取哪些措施来发展上海的社区卫生保健?
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2011 Oct-Dec;26(4):379-435. doi: 10.1002/hpm.1117.
9
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
10
Healthcare services gap analysis: a supply capture and demand forecast modelling, Dubai 2018-2030.医疗保健服务差距分析:供应捕获和需求预测建模,迪拜 2018-2030 年。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 10;23(1):468. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09401-y.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison among optimization software to solve bi-objective sectorization problem.用于解决双目标分区问题的优化软件之间的比较。
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 29;9(8):e18602. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18602. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Do patients' preferences prevail in hospital selection?: a comparison between discrete choice experiments and revealed hospital choice.患者的偏好是否在医院选择中占主导地位?:离散选择实验与揭示性医院选择的比较。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 8;22(1):1136. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08403-6.
3
Bi-objective design-for-control for improving the pressure management and resilience of water distribution networks.
双目标设计-控制,以改善供水管网的压力管理和弹性。
Water Res. 2022 Aug 15;222:118914. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118914. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
4
Geographical accessibility to upper secondary education: an Italian regional case study.接受高中教育的地理可达性:一项意大利地区案例研究。
Ann Reg Sci. 2022;69(2):511-536. doi: 10.1007/s00168-022-01146-6. Epub 2022 May 28.
5
Towards a more efficient healthcare system: Opportunities and challenges caused by hospital closures amid the COVID-19 pandemic.迈向更高效的医疗保健系统:COVID-19 大流行期间医院关闭带来的机遇和挑战。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2022 Jun;25(2):187-190. doi: 10.1007/s10729-022-09591-7. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
6
A flexible method for optimising sharing of healthcare resources and demand in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.一种灵活的方法,用于优化 COVID-19 大流行背景下的医疗资源和需求共享。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 21;15(10):e0241027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241027. eCollection 2020.
7
Advancing evidence-based healthcare facility design: a systematic literature review.推进循证医疗设施设计:系统文献回顾。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2020 Sep;23(3):453-480. doi: 10.1007/s10729-020-09506-4. Epub 2020 May 24.
8
Dynamic patient data bases: the foundation of an integrated approach to outcome measures for the healthcare professionals.动态患者数据库:医疗专业人员综合成果测量方法的基础。
Medinfo. 1995;8 Pt 1:483.