Suppr超能文献

照顾者应对方式在照顾者对痴呆症的理解(作为终末期疾病)与其痛苦之间起中介作用。

Caregiver coping mediates the relationship between caregivers' understanding of dementia as terminal and their distress.

机构信息

Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.

Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Sep;20(9):6606-6614. doi: 10.1002/alz.14102. Epub 2024 Jul 6.

Abstract

We assessed which coping strategies (problem-focused, emotion-focused, dysfunctional) mediate the association between caregivers' understanding of dementia as terminal and their distress. A total of 215 caregivers of community-dwelling persons with severe dementia were surveyed every 4 months over 3 years. A generalized structural equation model was used to test mediation. Caregivers who correctly understood dementia as terminal and those unsure (vs incorrect), experienced more distress (correct: β [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.80 [0.00 to 1.60]; unsure: 0.95 [0.04 to 1.87]). Caregivers with correct understanding of dementia as terminal (vs incorrect) employed more dysfunctional (2.01 [0.60 to 3.42]) and problem-focused coping strategies (2.56 [0.08 to 5.05]). Although dysfunctional and problem-focused coping (associated with higher distress) mediated the positive association between caregivers' understanding that dementia is terminal and their distress, emotion-focused coping (associated with lower distress) did not offset this relationship. Results suggest that terminal illness disclosure to caregivers should be accompanied by interventions to promote emotion-focused coping strategies. Highlights Caregivers who understood dementia as terminal experienced more distress. Dysfunctional and problem-focused coping mediated the positive relationship between terminal illness understanding and caregiver distress. Emotion-focused coping did not offset this relationship.

摘要

我们评估了哪些应对策略(问题焦点型、情绪焦点型、功能失调型)在照顾者对痴呆症的理解(临终、不确定)与他们的痛苦之间起中介作用。共有 215 名居住在社区的严重痴呆症患者的照顾者在 3 年内每 4 个月接受一次调查。使用广义结构方程模型来检验中介作用。正确理解痴呆症为终末期的照顾者和不确定(而非错误)的照顾者经历了更多的痛苦(正确:β[95%置信区间(CI)]:0.80 [0.00 至 1.60];不确定:0.95 [0.04 至 1.87])。正确理解痴呆症为终末期的照顾者(而非错误)采用了更多的功能失调(2.01 [0.60 至 3.42])和问题焦点型应对策略(2.56 [0.08 至 5.05])。尽管功能失调和问题焦点型应对策略(与更高的痛苦相关)中介了照顾者对痴呆症是终末期的理解与其痛苦之间的正相关关系,但情绪焦点型应对策略(与更低的痛苦相关)并没有抵消这种关系。结果表明,应该向照顾者披露临终疾病,并辅以促进情绪焦点型应对策略的干预措施。重点 理解痴呆症为终末期的照顾者经历了更多的痛苦。功能失调和问题焦点型应对策略在理解临终疾病与照顾者痛苦之间的正相关关系中起中介作用。情绪焦点型应对策略没有抵消这种关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/407b/11497640/d59cc05c5bcd/ALZ-20-6606-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验