Research Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore.
Department of Clinical Governance and Quality, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore.
Gerontologist. 2021 Jul 13;61(5):680-692. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa080.
Existing studies typically explore the factor structure of coping strategies among dementia caregivers. However, this approach overlooks the fact that caregivers often use different coping strategies simultaneously. This study aims to explore the coping patterns of primary informal dementia caregivers in Singapore, examine their significant correlates, and investigate whether different patterns would affect the depressive symptoms of caregivers.
Two hundred eighty-one primary informal caregivers of persons with dementia (PWD) were assessed. Coping strategies were measured by the Brief Coping Orientation to Problem Experienced inventory. A latent class analysis was performed to explore caregivers' coping patterns, followed by logistic regressions to identify the significant correlates and the relationships between coping patterns and caregiver depression.
The latent class analysis suggested a three-class solution that was featured by the frequency and variety of coping strategies used by caregivers-high coping (36.3%), medium coping (37.7%), and low coping (26.0%). Factors influencing the coping patterns of our sample were mainly related to caregivers' individual resources such as personal characteristics and caregiving stressors like PWD's problematic behaviors and caregiving burden. Compared to caregivers in the low coping group, those in the medium coping group had significantly higher risks of potential depression.
The current study confirmed that there are distinct coping patterns among primary informal dementia caregivers, and caregivers with the low coping pattern had fewer depressive symptoms. Future research is needed to explore if coping patterns from our sample are generalizable to dementia caregivers elsewhere.
现有研究通常探讨痴呆症照顾者应对策略的因素结构。然而,这种方法忽略了一个事实,即照顾者通常同时使用不同的应对策略。本研究旨在探索新加坡主要非正规痴呆症照顾者的应对模式,考察其显著相关因素,并探讨不同模式是否会影响照顾者的抑郁症状。
评估了 281 名痴呆症患者(PWD)的主要非正规照顾者。应对策略采用简短应对取向问题经验量表进行测量。采用潜在类别分析探索照顾者的应对模式,然后进行逻辑回归,以确定显著相关因素以及应对模式与照顾者抑郁之间的关系。
潜在类别分析提出了一个三类别解决方案,其特点是照顾者使用应对策略的频率和种类-高应对(36.3%)、中应对(37.7%)和低应对(26.0%)。影响我们样本应对模式的因素主要与照顾者的个人资源有关,如个人特征和照顾者压力源,如 PWD 的问题行为和照顾负担。与低应对组的照顾者相比,中应对组的照顾者有明显更高的潜在抑郁风险。
本研究证实,主要非正规痴呆症照顾者存在不同的应对模式,低应对模式的照顾者抑郁症状较少。需要进一步研究来探讨我们样本中的应对模式是否适用于其他地方的痴呆症照顾者。