Orthodontic Unit, Adelaide Dental School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024 Aug;10(4):e919. doi: 10.1002/cre2.919.
The primary aim of the investigation was to survey clear aligner therapy (CAT) use among general dentists in Australia. A secondary aim was to evaluate the factors that influenced general dentists in Australia not to provide CAT.
General dentists registered with the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency were invited to participate in a structured cross-sectional electronic survey. The survey covered demographics, preferred CAT systems and practices, relevant treatment planning and retention protocols, patient-reported CAT issues, pertinent respondent opinions, and reasons for not providing CAT. Descriptive statistics were computed via GraphPad Prism v10 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).
Most of the 264 (n = 172; 65.2%) respondents indicated that they provided CAT. The majority (n = 82; 58.6%) reported that they treated between 1 and 20 patients with CAT annually. Invisalign was the most used system (n = 83; 61.2%), with 55 (41.7%), indicating that they used more than one system. Most (n = 124; 98.4%) were comfortable using CAT for mild crowding, whereas 73.4% (n = 94) were not comfortable in treating severe crowding with CAT. The median (IQR) number of patients per respondent treated with extraction of a permanent incisor or premolar was 0 (0). Issues regarding tooth positions were reportedly always or mostly in need of change in the initial treatment plan by 68.7%. Problems regarding patient compliance with CAT wear protocols (n = 67; 45.6%) and the predictability of treatment outcomes (n = 31; 21.1%) were the most identified themes of the free-text comments. Over 80% of those who did not provide CAT indicated that they preferred to refer to an orthodontist for management.
Almost two-thirds of the respondents provided CAT. Invisalign was the most used system. The majority use CAT combined with nonextraction treatment. Most of those who did not provide CAT preferred to refer to an orthodontist for patient management.
调查的主要目的是调查澳大利亚普通牙医使用隐形矫正治疗(CAT)的情况。次要目的是评估影响澳大利亚普通牙医不提供 CAT 的因素。
澳大利亚健康从业者监管机构注册的普通牙医被邀请参加一项结构化的横断面电子调查。调查涵盖了人口统计学、首选的 CAT 系统和实践、相关的治疗计划和保留方案、患者报告的 CAT 问题、相关受访者意见以及不提供 CAT 的原因。通过 GraphPad Prism v10(GraphPad Software Inc.,La Jolla,CA,USA)计算描述性统计数据。
264 名受访者中,大多数(n=172;65.2%)表示他们提供了 CAT。大多数(n=82;58.6%)报告每年治疗 1 到 20 名接受 CAT 治疗的患者。Invisalign 是使用最多的系统(n=83;61.2%),其中 55 名(41.7%)表示他们使用了不止一个系统。大多数(n=124;98.4%)对使用 CAT 治疗轻度拥挤感到舒适,而 73.4%(n=94)对使用 CAT 治疗严重拥挤感到不舒适。中位数(IQR)每位受访者接受永久性侧切牙或尖牙拔除的患者数量为 0(0)。报告称,在初始治疗计划中,68.7%的患者始终或大部分需要改变牙齿位置。关于患者对 CAT 佩戴方案依从性(n=67;45.6%)和治疗结果可预测性(n=31;21.1%)的问题是自由文本评论中最常提到的主题。超过 80%的不提供 CAT 的受访者表示,他们更愿意将患者转介给正畸医生进行管理。
近三分之二的受访者提供了 CAT。Invisalign 是使用最多的系统。大多数人将 CAT 与非拔牙治疗相结合。大多数不提供 CAT 的人更喜欢将患者转介给正畸医生进行管理。