Wu Huei-Jiuan, Applegate Tanya L, Kwon Jisoo A, Cunningham Evan B, Grebely Jason, Gray Richard T, Shih Sophy T F
The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2024 Jun 13;48:101119. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101119. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Simplified hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing integrated into existing HIV services has the potential to improve HCV diagnoses and treatment. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of integrating different simplified HCV testing strategies into existing HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and treatment services among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Taiwan.
Mathematical modeling was used to assess the cost-effectiveness of integrating simplified HCV tests (point-of-care antibody, reflex RNA, or immediate point-of-care RNA) with HCV treatment into existing HIV prevention and care for MSM from a healthcare perspective. The impact of increasing PrEP and HIV treatment coverage among MSM in combination with these HCV testing strategies was also considered. We reported lifetime costs (2022 US dollars) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) with a 3% annual discounting rate.
Point-of-care HCV antibody and reflex RNA testing are cost-effective compared to current HCV testing in all PrEP and HIV treatment coverage scenarios (ICERs <$32,811/QALY gained). Immediate point-of-care RNA testing would be only cost-effective compared to the current HCV testing if coverage of HIV services remained unchanged. Point-of-care antibody testing in an unchanged HIV services coverage scenario and all simplified HCV testing strategies in scenarios that increased both HIV PrEP and treatment coverage form an efficient frontier, indicating best value for money strategies.
Our findings support the integration of simplified HCV testing and people-centered services for MSM and highlight the economic benefits of integrating simplified HCV testing into existing services for MSM alongside HIV PrEP and treatment.
This study was made possible as part of a research-funded PhD being undertaken by HJW under the UNSW Sydney Scientia scholarship and was associated with the Rapid Point of Care Research Consortium for infectious disease in the Asia Pacific (RAPID), which is funded by an NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence. JG is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator Grant (1176131).
将简化的丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)检测整合到现有的艾滋病病毒(HIV)服务中,有可能改善HCV的诊断和治疗。我们评估了将不同的简化HCV检测策略整合到台湾男男性行为者(MSM)现有的HIV暴露前预防(PrEP)和治疗服务中的成本效益。
从医疗保健角度出发,使用数学模型评估将简化的HCV检测(即时护理抗体、反射性RNA或即时即时护理RNA)与HCV治疗整合到MSM现有的HIV预防和护理中的成本效益。还考虑了在MSM中增加PrEP和HIV治疗覆盖率并结合这些HCV检测策略的影响。我们报告了终生成本(2022美元)和质量调整生命年(QALY),并计算了年贴现率为3%的增量成本效益比(ICER)。
在所有PrEP和HIV治疗覆盖率情况下,即时护理HCV抗体和反射性RNA检测与当前HCV检测相比具有成本效益(ICER <$32,811/QALY获得)。只有在HIV服务覆盖率保持不变的情况下,即时即时护理RNA检测与当前HCV检测相比才具有成本效益。在HIV服务覆盖率不变的情况下进行即时护理抗体检测,以及在HIV PrEP和治疗覆盖率均增加的情况下采用所有简化的HCV检测策略,构成了一个有效前沿,表明了性价比最佳的策略。
我们的研究结果支持将简化的HCV检测和以人为主的服务整合到针对MSM的服务中,并强调了将简化的HCV检测与MSM现有的HIV PrEP和治疗服务整合的经济效益。
本研究得以开展,是作为HJW在新南威尔士大学悉尼分校Scientia奖学金资助下进行的研究资助博士项目的一部分,并且与亚太地区传染病即时护理快速研究联盟(RAPID)相关,该联盟由NHMRC卓越研究中心资助。JG得到了国家卫生与医学研究委员会研究员资助(1176131)。