Grimes D A, Schulz K F
J Reprod Med. 1985 Jul;30(7):505-14.
The comparative safety of methods used to perform second-trimester abortion is an important public health concern. Morbidity and mortality studies have indicated that dilation and evacuation (D&E) is safer than instillation abortion, which is safer than hysterotomy and hysterectomy. In the third phase of the Joint Program for the Study of Abortion, the adjusted relative risk of serious complications associated with the intraamniotic instillation of urea and prostaglandin F2 alpha (the safest abortifacient regimen) was 1.9 times that associated with D&E (95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.1). An analysis of abortion mortality in the United States from 1972 to 1981 revealed a death-to-case rate of 4.9 per 100,000 abortions associated with D&E, 9.6 with instillation methods and over 60 with hysterotomy and hysterectomy. Little information exists concerning potential late sequelae of second-trimester abortion. D&E appears to be the safest method of second-trimester abortion available in the United States.
孕中期堕胎所采用方法的相对安全性是一个重要的公共卫生问题。发病率和死亡率研究表明,扩张刮宫术(D&E)比羊膜腔内注射堕胎法更安全,而羊膜腔内注射堕胎法又比子宫切开术和子宫切除术更安全。在堕胎研究联合项目的第三阶段,与羊膜腔内注射尿素和前列腺素F2α(最安全的堕胎方案)相关的严重并发症的校正相对风险是与扩张刮宫术相关风险的1.9倍(95%置信区间为1.2 - 3.)。对1972年至1981年美国堕胎死亡率的分析显示,每10万例扩张刮宫术堕胎的死亡病例率为4.9,羊膜腔内注射法为9.6,子宫切开术和子宫切除术超过60。关于孕中期堕胎潜在的晚期后遗症的信息很少。扩张刮宫术似乎是美国现有的孕中期堕胎最安全的方法。