Suppr超能文献

埃塞俄比亚 13-20 孕周的手术与药物终止妊娠比较:一项准实验研究。

Comparison of surgical versus medical termination of pregnancy between 13-20 weeks of gestation in Ethiopia: A quasi-experimental study.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saint Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Department of Public Health, Saint Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 1;16(4):e0249529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249529. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dilation and evacuation is a method of second trimester pregnancy termination introduced recently in Ethiopia. However, little is known about the safety and effectiveness of this method in an Ethiopian setting. Therefore, the study is intended to determine the safety and effectiveness of dilation and evacuation for surgical abortion as compared to medical abortion between 13-20 weeks' gestational age.

METHODS

This is a quasi-experimental study of women receiving second trimester termination of pregnancy between 13-20 weeks. Patients were allocated to either medical or surgical abortion based on their preference. A structured questionnaire was used to collect demographic information and clinical data upon admission. Procedure related information was collected after the procedure was completed and before the patient was discharged. Additionally, women were contacted 2 weeks after the procedure to evaluate for post-procedural complications. The primary outcome of the study was a composite complication rate. Data were collected using Open Data Kit and then analyzed using Stata version 14.2. Univariate analyses were performed using means (standard deviation), or medians (interquartile range) when the distribution was not normal. Multiple logistic regression was also performed to control for confounders.

RESULTS

Two hundred nineteen women chose medical abortion and 60 chose surgical abortion. The composite complication rate is not significantly different among medical and surgical abortion patients (15% versus 10%; p = 0.52). Nine patients (4.1%) in the medical arm required additional intervention to complete the abortion, while none of the surgical abortion patients required additional intervention. Median (IQR) hospital stay was significantly longer in the medical group at 24 (12-24) hours versus 6(4-6) hours in the surgical group p<0.001.

CONCLUSION

From the current study findings, we concluded that there is no difference in safety between surgical and medical methods of abortion. This study demonstrates that surgical abortion can be used as a safe and effective alternative to medical abortion and should be offered equivalently with medical abortion, per the patient's preference.

摘要

背景

扩张和排空是最近在埃塞俄比亚引入的中期妊娠终止方法。然而,在埃塞俄比亚环境中,这种方法的安全性和有效性知之甚少。因此,本研究旨在确定 13-20 周妊娠扩张和排空术与药物流产相比用于手术流产的安全性和有效性。

方法

这是一项在 13-20 周接受中期妊娠终止的女性中进行的准实验研究。根据患者的偏好,将患者分配到药物或手术流产组。入院时使用结构化问卷收集人口统计学信息和临床数据。在完成程序并在患者出院前收集与程序相关的信息。此外,在程序后 2 周联系女性以评估术后并发症。该研究的主要结局是复合并发症发生率。使用 Open Data Kit 收集数据,然后使用 Stata 版本 14.2 进行分析。使用均值(标准差)进行单变量分析,或者使用分布不正常时的中位数(四分位距)进行分析。还进行了多变量逻辑回归以控制混杂因素。

结果

219 名女性选择药物流产,60 名女性选择手术流产。药物和手术流产患者的复合并发症发生率无显著差异(15%比 10%;p=0.52)。药物流产组中有 9 名患者(4.1%)需要额外干预才能完成流产,而手术流产组中无一例患者需要额外干预。药物流产组的中位(IQR)住院时间明显长于手术流产组,分别为 24(12-24)小时和 6(4-6)小时,p<0.001。

结论

根据目前的研究结果,我们得出结论,手术和药物流产方法的安全性没有差异。本研究表明,手术流产可以作为药物流产的安全有效替代方法,并且应该根据患者的偏好与药物流产同等提供。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9764/8016219/4864f1b11b47/pone.0249529.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验