Department of Trauma and Emergency, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
College of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Injury. 2024 Aug;55(8):111697. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111697. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
Human-elephant conflicts (HECs) are becoming a disturbing public health concern in eastern India. This study highlights the pattern of injuries, epidemiological factors, and outcomes among the victims who survived an elephant attack (EA).
This retrospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. Data were retrieved from the medical records of EA victims who presented to the emergency department of the hospital over five years (January 2019-January 2024). Data regarding sociodemographic characteristics, injury mode, injury pattern, radiological findings, emergency procedures, and outcome variables (admission, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, and death) were collected.
In total, 45 EA victims were included in this study. The mean participant age was 45.8 ± 14.57 years. Of the total participants, 35 (78 %) were men. Most EAs [n = 18 (40 %)] occurred in the forest area and during the early morning hours between 4am and 8am [n = 18 (40 %)] of the winter season [n = 37 (82 %)] and were unprovoked [38 (84 %)]. Of the total injuries, 26 (67 %) injuries were due to the direct mode of EA and 13 (33 %) were due to the indirect mode. The most common mechanism of EA was using the trunk and foot [20 (51 %)], followed by the tusk [6 (15 %)]. The median ISS in victims was 20 (13-29). The median AIS score of chest injuries was 1 (0-3). Thirteen (29 %) patients were positive on e-FAST. Of the total EA victims, 12 (26 %) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and 17 were admitted to the wards. Severe chest injury (AIS score ≥ 3) (p = 0.003), direct mode of injury, and polytrauma (ISS > 16) were identified as significant factors contributing to ICU admission. The median ICU stay of the victims was 6 (3-8) days, and the median length of hospital stay was 7 (0.5-11) days. One inpatient mortality was noted.
Middle-aged men were the most common victims of EA occurring during the early morning hours. Extremity and soft tissue injuries were most common, followed by chest and abdominal injuries. Severe chest injury resulted in ICU admission and extended hospitalization.
在印度东部,人与大象冲突(HEC)正成为一个令人不安的公共卫生问题。本研究重点介绍了在医院急诊部门就诊的幸存大象袭击(EA)受害者的伤害模式、流行病学因素和结局。
这是一项在三级保健医院进行的回顾性观察研究。从医院急诊部门就诊的 EA 受害者的医疗记录中检索数据,时间跨度为五年(2019 年 1 月至 2024 年 1 月)。收集了社会人口统计学特征、损伤模式、损伤类型、影像学发现、急诊程序以及结局变量(入院、重症监护病房和住院时间、死亡)的数据。
共有 45 名 EA 受害者纳入本研究。参与者的平均年龄为 45.8±14.57 岁。其中 35 名(78%)为男性。大多数 EA(n=18,40%)发生在森林地区,清晨 4 点至 8 点(n=18,40%),冬季(n=37,82%),并且是无端的(38,84%)。总损伤中,26 例(67%)为直接模式的 EA 所致,13 例(33%)为间接模式所致。最常见的 EA 机制是使用躯干和脚部(20,51%),其次是獠牙(6,15%)。受害者的中位数 ISS 为 20(13-29)。胸部损伤的 AIS 评分中位数为 1(0-3)。13 名(29%)患者 e-FAST 呈阳性。在所有 EA 受害者中,12 名(26%)入住重症监护病房(ICU),17 名入住病房。严重胸部损伤(AIS 评分≥3)(p=0.003)、直接损伤模式和多发伤(ISS>16)被确定为导致 ICU 入住的显著因素。受害者的 ICU 住院时间中位数为 6(3-8)天,住院时间中位数为 7(0.5-11)天。一名住院患者死亡。
中年男性是清晨时段最常见的 EA 受害者。四肢和软组织损伤最常见,其次是胸部和腹部损伤。严重胸部损伤导致 ICU 入住和延长住院时间。