Cranfield Environment Centre, Cranfield University, Bedfordshire, UK.
Glob Chang Biol. 2024 Jul;30(7):e17397. doi: 10.1111/gcb.17397.
Restoring biodiversity-based resilience and ecosystem multi-functionality needs to be informed by more accurate predictions of animal biodiversity responses to environmental change. Ecological models make a substantial contribution to this understanding, especially when they encode the biological mechanisms and processes that give rise to emergent patterns (population, community, ecosystem properties and dynamics). Here, a distinction between 'mechanistic' and 'process-based' ecological models is established to review existing approaches. Mechanistic and process-based ecological models have made key advances to understanding the structure, function and dynamics of animal biodiversity, but are typically designed to account for specific levels of biological organisation and spatiotemporal scales. Cross-scale ecological models, which predict emergent co-occurring biodiversity patterns at interacting scales of space, time and biological organisation, is a critical next step in predictive ecology. A way forward is to first capitalise on existing models to systematically evaluate the ability of scale-explicit mechanisms and processes to predict emergent patterns at alternative scales. Such model intercomparisons will reveal mechanism to process transitions across fine to broad scales, overcome approach-specific barriers to model realism or tractability and identify gaps which necessitate the development of new fundamental principles. Key challenges surrounding model complexity and uncertainty would need to be addressed, and while opportunities from big data can streamline the integration of multiple scale-explicit biodiversity patterns, ambitious cross-scale field studies are also needed. Crucially, overcoming cross-scale ecological modelling challenges would unite disparate fields of ecology with the common goal of improving the evidence-base to safeguard biodiversity and ecosystems under novel environmental change.
为了恢复基于生物多样性的弹性和生态系统多功能性,需要更准确地预测动物生物多样性对环境变化的反应。生态模型为此提供了重要的帮助,尤其是当它们编码了产生涌现模式(种群、群落、生态系统属性和动态)的生物机制和过程时。在这里,建立了“机械论”和“基于过程”的生态模型之间的区别,以回顾现有的方法。机械论和基于过程的生态模型在理解动物生物多样性的结构、功能和动态方面取得了重大进展,但通常旨在解释特定层次的生物组织和时空尺度。跨尺度生态模型,即预测在空间、时间和生物组织相互作用的尺度上出现的共存生物多样性模式,是预测生态学的关键下一步。一种方法是首先利用现有的模型,系统地评估尺度明确的机制和过程在替代尺度上预测涌现模式的能力。这种模型比较将揭示从细到粗尺度的机制到过程的转变,克服模型现实性或可操作性的特定方法障碍,并确定需要开发新的基本原则的差距。需要解决模型复杂性和不确定性方面的关键挑战,虽然大数据带来了机会,可以简化多个尺度明确的生物多样性模式的整合,但也需要雄心勃勃的跨尺度野外研究。至关重要的是,克服跨尺度生态建模的挑战将把生态学的不同领域联合起来,共同的目标是改善证据基础,以保护生物多样性和生态系统免受新环境变化的影响。