Long Maebh, Calude Andreea, Burnette Jessie
English Programme, University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand.
University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
J Med Humanit. 2025 Mar;46(1):115-140. doi: 10.1007/s10912-024-09859-9. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
In this paper, we draw on qualitative methods from the medical humanities and quantitative approaches from corpus linguistics to assess the different mappings of pandemic risks by Twitter (X) users employing the #Covid19nz hashtag. We look specifically at their responses to government measures around vaccines between August and November 2021. Risk, we reveal, was a major discursive thread in tweets during this period, but within our tweets, it was the vaccine rather than the virus around which hazard perception and response were grouped. We find that the discursive stance of those opposed to the vaccine evoked entangled medical and political hazards, untrustworthy experts, obscure information, restrictions on sovereignty, threats to children, and uncertain future dangers, all of which positioned them within what Ulrich Beck termed the world risk society. We also found that these narratives of risk manifested in specific Twitter styles, which employed a consistently larger number of hashtags. The lack of conjunctions between the hashtags, we argue, encouraged a disordered reading of doubt and precaution, as the hashtags presented triggering phrases whose interconnections were hinted at rather than specified. By contrast, those who tweeted in support of government measures were rhetorically led by solutions rather than risks, with one exception: their perception of those who were vaccine opposed. We use scholarship on risk and precautionary logic to map out the contrasting positions in tweets addressing Aotearoa New Zealand's pandemic experience during the closing months of 2021.
在本文中,我们借鉴医学人文学科的定性方法和语料库语言学的定量方法,以评估使用#Covid19nz标签的推特(X)用户对大流行风险的不同映射。我们特别关注他们在2021年8月至11月期间对政府疫苗措施的反应。我们发现,风险是这一时期推文的一个主要话语线索,但在我们的推文中,围绕其形成风险认知和反应的是疫苗而非病毒。我们发现,反对疫苗者的话语立场引发了交织在一起的医学和政治风险、不值得信任的专家、模糊的信息、对主权的限制、对儿童的威胁以及不确定的未来危险,所有这些都将他们置于乌尔里希·贝克所称的世界风险社会之中。我们还发现,这些风险叙述以特定的推特风格呈现,这些风格使用的标签数量始终更多。我们认为,标签之间缺乏连词,促使人们以无序的方式解读怀疑和预防措施,因为这些标签呈现出一些触发短语,其相互联系只是被暗示而非明确指出。相比之下,那些发推文支持政府措施的人在修辞上以解决方案而非风险为主导,只有一个例外:他们对反对疫苗者的看法。我们运用关于风险和预防逻辑的学术研究,描绘出2021年末在推文中针对新西兰应对疫情经历的不同立场。