• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于人工智能的新辅助治疗后残胰癌切除标本的分割(ISGPP-2):国际改进和验证研究。

Artificial Intelligence-based Segmentation of Residual Pancreatic Cancer in Resection Specimens Following Neoadjuvant Treatment (ISGPP-2): International Improvement and Validation Study.

机构信息

Departments of Surgery.

Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam.

出版信息

Am J Surg Pathol. 2024 Sep 1;48(9):1108-1116. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000002270. Epub 2024 Jul 2.

DOI:10.1097/PAS.0000000000002270
PMID:38985503
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11321604/
Abstract

Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has become routine in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Pathologists examine pancreatic cancer resection specimens to evaluate the effect of NAT. However, an automated scoring system to objectively quantify residual pancreatic cancer (RPC) is currently lacking. Herein, we developed and validated the first automated segmentation model using artificial intelligence techniques to objectively quantify RPC. Digitized histopathological tissue slides were included from resected pancreatic cancer specimens from 14 centers in 7 countries in Europe, North America, Australia, and Asia. Four different scanner types were used: Philips (56%), Hamamatsu (27%), 3DHistech (10%), and Leica (7%). Regions of interest were annotated and classified as cancer, non-neoplastic pancreatic ducts, and others. A U-Net model was trained to detect RPC. Validation consisted of by-scanner internal-external cross-validation. Overall, 528 unique hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) slides from 528 patients were included. In the individual Philips, Hamamatsu, 3DHistech, and Leica scanner cross-validations, mean F1 scores of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77-0.84), 0.80 (0.78-0.83), 0.76 (0.65-0.78), and 0.71 (0.65-0.78) were achieved, respectively. In the meta-analysis of the cross-validations, the mean F1 score was 0.78 (0.71-0.84). A final model was trained on the entire data set. This ISGPP model is the first segmentation model using artificial intelligence techniques to objectively quantify RPC following NAT. The internally-externally cross-validated model in this study demonstrated robust performance in detecting RPC in specimens. The ISGPP model, now made publically available, enables automated RPC segmentation and forms the basis for objective NAT response evaluation in pancreatic cancer.

摘要

新辅助治疗(NAT)已成为边界可切除胰腺癌患者的常规治疗方法。病理学家检查胰腺癌切除标本以评估 NAT 的效果。然而,目前缺乏一种用于客观量化残余胰腺癌(RPC)的自动评分系统。在此,我们使用人工智能技术开发并验证了第一个用于客观量化 RPC 的自动分割模型。纳入了来自欧洲、北美、澳大利亚和亚洲 7 个国家的 14 个中心的切除胰腺癌标本的数字化组织学组织切片。使用了四种不同的扫描仪类型:飞利浦(56%)、滨松(27%)、3DHistech(10%)和徕卡(7%)。标记了感兴趣的区域,并将其分类为癌症、非肿瘤性胰腺导管和其他。使用 U-Net 模型来检测 RPC。验证包括按扫描仪进行的内部-外部交叉验证。总共纳入了 528 名患者的 528 个独特的苏木精和伊红(H&E)切片。在单独的飞利浦、滨松、3DHistech 和徕卡扫描仪交叉验证中,分别获得了 0.81(95%CI,0.77-0.84)、0.80(0.78-0.83)、0.76(0.65-0.78)和 0.71(0.65-0.78)的平均 F1 评分。在交叉验证的荟萃分析中,平均 F1 得分为 0.78(0.71-0.84)。最终模型是在整个数据集上训练的。该 ISGPP 模型是第一个使用人工智能技术客观量化 NAT 后 RPC 的分割模型。本研究中内部-外部交叉验证模型在检测标本中的 RPC 方面表现出稳健的性能。现在公开提供的 ISGPP 模型支持自动 RPC 分割,并为胰腺癌的客观 NAT 反应评估奠定了基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e856/11321604/4413a1067007/pas-48-1108-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e856/11321604/85aebf7aecd0/pas-48-1108-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e856/11321604/60f0a3fa78cc/pas-48-1108-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e856/11321604/4413a1067007/pas-48-1108-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e856/11321604/85aebf7aecd0/pas-48-1108-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e856/11321604/60f0a3fa78cc/pas-48-1108-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e856/11321604/4413a1067007/pas-48-1108-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Artificial Intelligence-based Segmentation of Residual Pancreatic Cancer in Resection Specimens Following Neoadjuvant Treatment (ISGPP-2): International Improvement and Validation Study.基于人工智能的新辅助治疗后残胰癌切除标本的分割(ISGPP-2):国际改进和验证研究。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2024 Sep 1;48(9):1108-1116. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000002270. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
2
Histopathological tumour response scoring in resected pancreatic cancer following neoadjuvant therapy: international interobserver study (ISGPP-1).新辅助治疗后切除的胰腺癌的组织病理学肿瘤反应评分:国际观察者间研究(ISGPP-1)。
Br J Surg. 2022 Dec 13;110(1):67-75. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac350.
3
Artificial Intelligence-Based Segmentation of Residual Tumor in Histopathology of Pancreatic Cancer after Neoadjuvant Treatment.基于人工智能的新辅助治疗后胰腺癌组织病理学中残留肿瘤的分割
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Oct 12;13(20):5089. doi: 10.3390/cancers13205089.
4
The impact of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with left-sided resectable pancreatic cancer: an international multicenter study.新辅助治疗对可切除左侧胰腺癌患者的影响:一项国际多中心研究。
Ann Oncol. 2025 May;36(5):529-542. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.12.015. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
5
Upfront surgery vs. neoadjuvant therapy for resectable pancreatic cancer: a narrative review of available evidence.可切除胰腺癌的 upfront 手术与新辅助治疗:现有证据的叙述性综述。
Chin Clin Oncol. 2022 Feb;11(1):2. doi: 10.21037/cco-21-161. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
6
An artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate cancer diagnosis in whole slide images of core needle biopsies: a blinded clinical validation and deployment study.一种用于经皮穿刺活检全切片图像中前列腺癌诊断的人工智能算法:一项盲法临床验证与应用研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Aug;2(8):e407-e416. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30159-X.
7
Intention to treat outcomes among patients with pancreatic cancer treated using International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery recommended pathways for resectable and borderline resectable disease.采用国际胰腺外科研究组推荐的可切除和交界可切除疾病路径治疗的胰腺癌患者的意向治疗结局。
ANZ J Surg. 2021 Jul;91(7-8):1549-1557. doi: 10.1111/ans.16643. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
8
Comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatments in patients with resectable, borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.比较可切除、边界可切除或局部进展期胰腺癌患者的 upfront 手术与新辅助治疗:随机临床试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Jun 1;110(6):3900-3909. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001313.
9
Evaluation of Short and Long-term Outcomes After Resection in Patients With Locally Advanced Versus (Borderline) Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.局部进展期与(临界)可切除胰腺癌患者切除术后短期和长期结局的评估
Ann Surg. 2025 Jun 1;281(6):1026-1031. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006289. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
10
Upfront Surgery and Surgery Following Neoadjuvant Treatment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Comparative Analysis of Short-term Postoperative Outcomes.胰腺癌新辅助治疗前行手术与新辅助治疗后手术:短期术后结局的对比分析。
Anticancer Res. 2021 Nov;41(11):5703-5712. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.15386.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Experimental Models of Colorectal Cancer: A Critical Appraisal from 2D Cell Systems to Organoids, Humanized Mouse Avatars, Organ-on-Chip, CRISPR Engineering, and AI-Driven Platforms-Challenges and Opportunities for Translational Precision Oncology.探索结直肠癌的实验模型:从二维细胞系统到类器官、人源化小鼠模型、芯片器官、CRISPR 工程以及人工智能驱动平台的批判性评估——转化精准肿瘤学的挑战与机遇
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 26;17(13):2163. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132163.
2
Artificial intelligence in pancreatic cancer histopathology and diagnostics - implications for clinical decisions and biomarker discovery?人工智能在胰腺癌组织病理学与诊断中的应用——对临床决策和生物标志物发现的影响?
Cell Div. 2025 Jun 17;20(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13008-025-00158-w.