• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Multimorbidity and patient experience with general practice: A national cross-sectional survey in Norway.多发病与全科医疗患者体验:挪威全国横断面调查。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jul 10;25(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02495-1.
2
Factors associated with patients' experience of accessibility to general practice: results from a national survey in Norway.与患者获得普通科医疗服务的可及性相关的因素:来自挪威全国调查的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 30;24(1):1008. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11460-8.
3
The Norwegian patient experiences with GP questionnaire (PEQ-GP): reliability and construct validity following a national survey.挪威患者对全科医生问卷的体验(PEQ-GP):全国性调查后的信度和结构效度
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 2;7(9):e016644. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016644.
4
Patient experiences with general practice in Norway: a comparison of immigrant groups and the majority population following a national survey.挪威的全科医疗患者体验:基于全国性调查对移民群体与多数人群的比较。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec 1;20(1):1106. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05963-3.
5
Patient experiences with general practitioners: psychometric performance of the generic PEQ-GP instrument among patients with chronic conditions.患者对全科医生的体验:慢性病患者通用 PEQ-GP 工具的心理计量学性能。
Fam Pract. 2022 May 28;39(3):519-526. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmab133.
6
Long term condition morbidity in English general practice: a cross-sectional study using three composite morbidity measures.英国全科医疗中的长期病症发病率:一项使用三种综合发病率指标的横断面研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Nov 29;17(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0563-3.
7
Why do patients with multimorbidity in England report worse experiences in primary care? Evidence from the General Practice Patient Survey.为什么英国患有多种疾病的患者在初级医疗保健中反馈的体验更差?来自全科医疗患者调查的证据。
BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 24;5(3):e006172. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006172.
8
International survey of people living with chronic conditions (PaRIS survey): effects of general practitioner non-participation on the representativeness of the Norwegian patient data.国际慢性病患者调查(PaRIS 调查):全科医生不参与对挪威患者数据代表性的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 18;24(1):1257. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11751-0.
9
Satisfaction with general practice care in German patients with multimorbidity: a cross-sectional study.德国多病共存患者对全科医疗服务的满意度:一项横断面研究。
Fam Pract. 2017 Aug 1;34(4):452-458. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw141.
10
Patient experiences and the association with organizational factors in general practice: results from the Norwegian part of the international, multi-centre, cross-sectional QUALICOPC study.患者体验及其与全科医疗组织因素的关联:国际多中心横断面QUALICOPC研究挪威部分的结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 24;16(1):428. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1684-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Importance of continuity of care from a patient perspective - a cross-sectional study in Swedish health care.从患者角度看连续性护理的重要性——瑞典医疗保健中的一项横断面研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2024 Mar;42(1):195-200. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2299119. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
2
Continuity of care and mortality for patients with chronic disease: an observational study using Norwegian registry data.慢性病患者的连续护理与死亡率:一项使用挪威注册数据的观察性研究。
Fam Pract. 2023 Dec 22;40(5-6):698-706. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad025.
3
Association between multimorbidity and hospitalization in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis.老年人多病共存与住院治疗的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Age Ageing. 2022 Jul 1;51(7). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac155.
4
Patient experiences with general practitioners: psychometric performance of the generic PEQ-GP instrument among patients with chronic conditions.患者对全科医生的体验:慢性病患者通用 PEQ-GP 工具的心理计量学性能。
Fam Pract. 2022 May 28;39(3):519-526. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmab133.
5
Applying natural language processing and machine learning techniques to patient experience feedback: a systematic review.应用自然语言处理和机器学习技术于患者体验反馈:系统综述。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2021 Mar;28(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100262.
6
Patient experiences with general practice in Norway: a comparison of immigrant groups and the majority population following a national survey.挪威的全科医疗患者体验:基于全国性调查对移民群体与多数人群的比较。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec 1;20(1):1106. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05963-3.
7
General practitioner strategies for managing patients with multimorbidity: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research.全科医生管理多病共存患者的策略:定性研究的系统评价和主题综合分析。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jul 1;21(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01197-8.
8
Multimorbidity and quality of life: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis.多病共存与生活质量:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Ageing Res Rev. 2019 Aug;53:100903. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
9
Influence of chronic diseases on societal participation in paid work, volunteering and informal caregiving in Europe: a 12-year follow-up study.慢性病对欧洲参与有偿工作、志愿服务和非正式护理的社会影响:一项为期 12 年的随访研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Feb;73(2):136-141. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211107. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
10
Can you recommend me a good GP? Describing social differences in patient satisfaction within 31 countries.你能给我推荐一位好的全科医生吗?描述31个国家患者满意度的社会差异。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Feb 1;30(1):9-15. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx157.

多发病与全科医疗患者体验:挪威全国横断面调查。

Multimorbidity and patient experience with general practice: A national cross-sectional survey in Norway.

机构信息

Norwegian Institute of Public Health, PO Box 222, Skøyen, Oslo, NO-0213, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jul 10;25(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02495-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12875-024-02495-1
PMID:38987692
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11238367/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient experience is an important indicator of the quality of healthcare. Patients with multimorbidity often face adverse health outcomes and increased healthcare utilisation. General practitioners play a crucial role in managing these patients. The main aim of our study was to perform an in-depth assessment of differences in patient-reported experience with general practice between patients living with chronic conditions and multimorbidity, and those with no chronic conditions.

METHODS

We performed secondary analyses of a national survey of patient experience with general practice in 2021 (response rate 41.9%, n = 7,912). We described the characteristics of all survey respondents with no, one, two, and three or more self-reported chronic conditions. We assessed patient experience using four scales from the Norwegian patient experience with GP questionnaire (PEQ-GP). These scales were used as dependent variables in bivariate and multivariate analyses and for testing the measurement model, including confirmatory factor analysis and a multigroup CFA to assess measurement invariance. Sentiment and content analysis of free-text comments was also performed.

RESULTS

Patients with chronic conditions consistently reported lower scores on the GP and GP practice experience scales, compared to those without chronic conditions. This pattern persisted even after adjustment for patient background variables. The strongest associations were found for the scale of "Enablement", followed by the scales of "GP" and "Practice". The subscale "Accessibility" did not correlate statistically significantly with any number of chronic conditions. The analysis of free-text comments echoed the quantitative results. Patients with multimorbidity stressed the importance of time spent on consultations, meeting the same GP, follow-up and relationship more often than patients with no chronic conditions. Our study also confirmed measurement invariance across patients with no chronic conditions and patients with multimorbidity, indicating that the observed differences in patient experience were a result of true differences, rather than artifacts of measurement bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings highlight the need for the healthcare system to provide customised support for patients with chronic conditions and multimorbidity. Addressing the specific needs of patients with multimorbidity is a critical step towards enhancing patient experience and the quality of care in general practice.

摘要

背景

患者体验是医疗保健质量的重要指标。患有多种合并症的患者通常面临不良的健康结果和增加的医疗保健利用。全科医生在管理这些患者方面发挥着至关重要的作用。我们研究的主要目的是深入评估患有慢性疾病和多种合并症的患者与无慢性疾病的患者在对全科医生的体验方面的差异。

方法

我们对 2021 年进行的一项全国性全科医生患者体验调查(回应率为 41.9%,n=7912)进行了二次分析。我们描述了所有自我报告有、无、一、两种或三种以上慢性疾病的调查受访者的特征。我们使用挪威全科医生患者体验问卷(PEQ-GP)的四个量表评估患者体验。这些量表在单变量和多变量分析中作为因变量使用,用于测试测量模型,包括验证性因素分析和多组 CFA,以评估测量不变性。我们还对自由文本评论进行了情感和内容分析。

结果

患有慢性疾病的患者在 GP 和 GP 实践体验量表上的得分始终低于无慢性疾病的患者。即使在调整了患者背景变量后,这种模式仍然存在。最强的关联见于“赋权”量表,其次是“GP”和“实践”量表。“可及性”子量表与任何数量的慢性疾病均无统计学显著相关性。自由文本评论的分析与定量结果相呼应。患有多种合并症的患者比无慢性疾病的患者更经常强调咨询时间、与同一位 GP 见面、随访和关系的重要性。我们的研究还证实了无慢性疾病的患者和患有多种合并症的患者之间的测量不变性,这表明患者体验的差异是真实差异的结果,而不是测量偏差的人为产物。

结论

研究结果强调需要为患有慢性疾病和多种合并症的患者提供定制的支持。满足多种合并症患者的特定需求是提高患者体验和全科医生护理质量的关键步骤。