Lee Gladys
Division of Ophthalmology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Private Practice, New York, NY, USA.
Ophthalmol Ther. 2024 Sep;13(9):2481-2493. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-00988-x. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
Despite promising results from technological therapies like intense pulsed light application, warm compress therapy is a mainstay in meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). However, applying warm compresses (WC) to the eyelids is palliative rather than curative and not always dispensed with specific instructions. The range of eyelid warming treatments available and lack of clear directives for use creates uncertainty for patients accustomed to explicit dosage information. This report examines data from clinical studies across the past 20 years to identify effective protocols for three types of WC-hot towel, microwavable eye mask, and self-heating eye mask (EM).
Literature search for studies on WC and MGD published between 2004 and 2023 in English was conducted. Studies wherein hot towel, microwavable EM, and self-heating EM were used in a treatment arm were included and those wherein they served only as control or were used in conjunction with another intervention were excluded. 20 resulting studies were separated into 3 groups: 5 on temperature profiles of WC, 6 with single application of WC, and 9 with repeated applications. Study methods and outcomes were tabulated, and a qualitative review was performed, attending to WC protocol and efficacy, as indicated by measures of tear film, meibomian gland health, and dry eye questionnaires.
Data from the aforementioned studies revealed that each method can achieve target eyelid temperature of 40 °C. A single application of WC-ranging from 5 to 20 min-can significantly improve tear quality, while repeated applications significantly relieve symptoms associated with dry eyes from MGD and, in most studies, significantly improve meibomian gland health. Hot towels, however, require frequent reheating to maintain eyelid temperatures above 40 °C, rendering them relatively ineffective in longitudinal studies. Microwavable EM retain heat well across 10 min and were found to improve tear break-up time and/or meibomian gland score. Self-heating EM have variable activation times and were typically applied for longer periods, showing benefits akin to microwavable EM in short-term studies. Studies monitoring compliance indicate greater deviation from protocol with higher application frequencies or longer-term use. Evidence suggests superior heat retention and therapeutic effects on specific contributing factors in MGD (such as Demodex) with moist-heat compress.
Considering decreased patience adherence to therapy with increased usage frequencies, and balancing needs to provide succinct instructions for various compress types, an advisable strategy is for patients to apply a moist-heat generating EM (microwavable or self-heating) to each eye for at least 10 min, prepared according to manufacturer's instructions.
尽管强脉冲光治疗等技术疗法取得了令人鼓舞的成果,但热敷疗法仍是睑板腺功能障碍(MGD)的主要治疗方法。然而,对眼睑进行热敷是一种姑息性而非治愈性的治疗方法,并且并非总是按照特定的说明进行操作。现有的眼睑温热治疗方法种类繁多,且缺乏明确的使用指南,这给习惯了明确剂量信息的患者带来了不确定性。本报告研究了过去20年临床研究的数据,以确定三种热敷方法——热毛巾、可微波加热眼罩和自热眼罩(EM)的有效方案。
对2004年至2023年间发表的关于热敷和MGD的英文研究进行文献检索。纳入在治疗组中使用热毛巾、可微波加热眼罩和自热眼罩的研究,排除仅作为对照或与其他干预措施联合使用的研究。将20项研究结果分为3组:5项关于热敷温度曲线的研究,6项单次热敷的研究,9项重复热敷的研究。将研究方法和结果制成表格,并进行定性综述,关注热敷方案和疗效,以泪膜、睑板腺健康和干眼问卷的测量结果为指标。
上述研究数据显示,每种方法都能使眼睑温度达到40°C。单次热敷5至20分钟可显著改善泪液质量,而重复热敷可显著缓解MGD引起的干眼症状,并且在大多数研究中,可显著改善睑板腺健康。然而,热毛巾需要频繁重新加热以保持眼睑温度高于40°C,这使得它们在纵向研究中相对无效。可微波加热眼罩在10分钟内保持热量良好,并且被发现可改善泪膜破裂时间和/或睑板腺评分。自热眼罩的激活时间各不相同,通常应用时间更长,在短期研究中显示出与可微波加热眼罩类似的益处。监测依从性的研究表明,随着热敷频率的增加或使用时间的延长,与方案的偏差更大。有证据表明,湿热敷对MGD的特定促成因素(如蠕形螨)具有更好的保温效果和治疗作用。
考虑到随着使用频率的增加患者对治疗的依从性降低,并需要为各种热敷类型提供简洁的说明,一个明智的策略是让患者按照制造商的说明,将一个产生湿热的眼罩(可微波加热或自热)敷在每只眼睛上至少10分钟。