Ngu A, Quinn M A
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985 Feb;25(1):41-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1985.tb00600.x.
A retrospective analysis was made of 456 patients who had previously undergone Caesarean section and who were considered suitable for a trial of labour. Sixty percent of patients had a vaginal delivery. Patients with obstructed labour or failure to progress as the indication for primary Caesarean section were significantly more likely to require a repeat operation but 44% of these patients still achieved a vaginal delivery. Patients who had had a vaginal delivery prior to, or subsequent to, the Caesarean section had a low incidence of repeat Caesarean section. X-ray pelvimetry was of limited value in predicting outcome. Intravenous oxytocin was used in 17% of patients. No uterine rupture occurred and no fetal mortality resulted directly due to the trial of labour. Trial of labour following Caesarean section is a safe procedure when conducted in an appropriate hospital setting.
对456例既往接受过剖宫产且被认为适合进行试产的患者进行了回顾性分析。60%的患者经阴道分娩。以产程梗阻或产程无进展作为首次剖宫产指征的患者更有可能需要再次手术,但这些患者中有44%仍实现了阴道分娩。在剖宫产之前或之后有过阴道分娩的患者再次剖宫产的发生率较低。X线骨盆测量在预测结局方面价值有限。17%的患者使用了静脉催产素。未发生子宫破裂,且试产未直接导致胎儿死亡。在适当的医院环境中进行剖宫产术后试产是一种安全的 procedure。 (注:原文中“procedure”直译为“程序”,结合语境这里意译为“做法”更合适,但要求不添加其他任何解释或说明,所以保留原文)