Alvarez-Mora Iker, Arturi Katarzyna, Béen Frederic, Buchinger Sebastian, El Mais Abd El Rahman, Gallampois Christine, Hahn Meike, Hollender Juliane, Houtman Corine, Johann Sarah, Krauss Martin, Lamoree Marja, Margalef Maria, Massei Riccardo, Brack Werner, Muz Melis
Department of Exposure Science, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
Research Centre for Experimental Marine Biology and Biotechnology (PIE), University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Plentzia, Basque Country, Spain.
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2025 Jan;417(3):451-472. doi: 10.1007/s00216-024-05424-4. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
The rapid increase in the production and global use of chemicals and their mixtures has raised concerns about their potential impact on human and environmental health. With advances in analytical techniques, in particular, high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), thousands of compounds and transformation products with potential adverse effects can now be detected in environmental samples. However, identifying and prioritizing the toxicity drivers among these compounds remain a significant challenge. Effect-directed analysis (EDA) emerged as an important tool to address this challenge, combining biotesting, sample fractionation, and chemical analysis to unravel toxicity drivers in complex mixtures. Traditional EDA workflows are labor-intensive and time-consuming, hindering large-scale applications. The concept of high-throughput (HT) EDA has recently gained traction as a means of accelerating these workflows. Key features of HT-EDA include the combination of microfractionation and downscaled bioassays, automation of sample preparation and biotesting, and efficient data processing workflows supported by novel computational tools. In addition to microplate-based fractionation, high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) offers an interesting alternative to HPLC in HT-EDA. This review provides an updated perspective on the state-of-the-art in HT-EDA, and novel methods/tools that can be incorporated into HT-EDA workflows. It also discusses recent studies on HT-EDA, HT bioassays, and computational prioritization tools, along with considerations regarding HPTLC. By identifying current gaps in HT-EDA and proposing new approaches to overcome them, this review aims to bring HT-EDA a step closer to monitoring applications.
化学品及其混合物的产量和全球使用量迅速增加,引发了人们对其对人类和环境健康潜在影响的担忧。特别是随着分析技术的进步,尤其是高分辨率质谱(HRMS),现在可以在环境样品中检测到数千种具有潜在不利影响的化合物和转化产物。然而,在这些化合物中识别毒性驱动因素并确定其优先级仍然是一项重大挑战。效应导向分析(EDA)作为应对这一挑战的重要工具应运而生,它将生物测试、样品分级分离和化学分析相结合,以揭示复杂混合物中的毒性驱动因素。传统的EDA工作流程劳动强度大、耗时,阻碍了大规模应用。高通量(HT)EDA的概念最近作为加速这些工作流程的一种手段而受到关注。HT-EDA的关键特性包括微分级分离和小型化生物测定的结合、样品制备和生物测试的自动化,以及由新型计算工具支持的高效数据处理工作流程。除了基于微孔板的分级分离外,在HT-EDA中,高效薄层色谱(HPTLC)为高效液相色谱(HPLC)提供了一种有趣的替代方法。本文综述了HT-EDA的最新进展,以及可纳入HT-EDA工作流程的新方法/工具。它还讨论了关于HT-EDA、HT生物测定和计算优先级工具的最新研究,以及有关HPTLC的注意事项。通过识别HT-EDA目前存在的差距并提出克服这些差距的新方法,本综述旨在使HT-EDA更接近监测应用。