Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr 48-52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Nov;281(11):5991-5999. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08815-6. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
To analyze the association of neurological disorders (ND) and head and neck cancer (HNC) with dysphagia severity and aspiration pneumonia occurrence.
Retrospective cohort study conducted at a university dysphagia center) for two consecutive years. Patients with ND or HNC were included if they had undergone a flexible endoscopic swallowing evaluation (FEES) at the dysphagia center, and at least one food consistency had been sampled and recorded. Outcomes of interest were swallowing safety, highest penetration-aspiration-score (PAS), way of food intake, presence of a tracheal tube, and occurrence of pneumonia within the past two years.
Of 257 consecutive patients, 199 were enrolled in the study and classified according to their underlying diagnosis into ND (120 patients) or HNC (79 patients). Forty-three HNC patients (54.4%) and 54 ND patients (45%) showed critical dysphagia in FEES (PAS ≥ 6). Binary logistic regression comparing both groups showed patients with ND to be 2.31 times more likely to develop pneumonia. However, if the 32 stroke patients were excluded from the calculation, PAS remains the only significant variable affecting pneumonia risk in both groups. Liquids were the main challenge for ND patients, while aspirating HNC patients struggled with all consistencies.
The study shows that patients with HNC and ND differ in pneumonia risk only if stroke patients are included in the ND group. If they are excluded, the PAS score is the only remaining risk factor for pneumonia. Thickening liquids may not be suitable for all dysphagic patients; individually tailored measures might be more helpful, especially for HNC patients.
分析神经疾病(ND)和头颈部癌症(HNC)与吞咽困难严重程度和吸入性肺炎发生的关系。
在大学吞咽障碍中心进行了一项连续两年的回顾性队列研究。在吞咽障碍中心进行了软性内镜吞咽评估(FEES)且至少有一次取样和记录食物稠度的患者,如果存在 ND 或 HNC,则将其纳入研究。主要观察指标为吞咽安全性、最高渗透-吸入评分(PAS)、进食方式、是否存在气管造口管以及过去两年内肺炎的发生情况。
在 257 例连续患者中,199 例被纳入研究,并根据其基础诊断分为 ND(120 例)或 HNC(79 例)。43 例 HNC 患者(54.4%)和 54 例 ND 患者(45%)在 FEES 中表现为严重吞咽困难(PAS≥6)。对两组进行二元逻辑回归比较显示,ND 患者发生肺炎的可能性是 HNC 患者的 2.31 倍。然而,如果将 32 例脑卒中患者从计算中排除,PAS 仍然是影响两组肺炎风险的唯一显著变量。对于 ND 患者,液体是主要的挑战,而 HNC 患者则在所有稠度下都有吸入的问题。
研究表明,只有在将脑卒中患者纳入 ND 组时,HNC 和 ND 患者在肺炎风险方面才存在差异。如果将其排除,PAS 评分是肺炎的唯一剩余危险因素。增稠液体可能并不适合所有吞咽困难患者;个体化的措施可能更有帮助,特别是对于 HNC 患者。