Clinton Health Access Initiative, 383 Dorchester Ave, Boston, MA, 02127, USA.
Afrocab, Lusaka, Zambia.
AIDS Behav. 2024 Oct;28(10):3437-3448. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04442-8. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
The HIV treatment landscape in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is rapidly evolving, exemplified by the expansion of differentiated service delivery (DSD) during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Long-acting products represent a new frontier that will require a significant redesign of health systems. It is critical to understand service delivery and product preferences of people living with HIV (PLHIV) and ensure evidence generation is guided by community priorities. We conducted a scoping review to identify gaps among preference studies and inform future research. Peer-reviewed articles published from January 2014-May 2022 reporting acceptability or preference data from PLHIV or caregivers for one or more service delivery or product attribute were eligible. Service delivery studies were restricted to LMIC populations while product studies had no geographical restrictions. Based on gaps identified, we consulted advocates to develop community-led research agenda recommendations. Of 6,493 studies identified, 225 studies on service delivery attributes and 47 studies on product preferences were eligible. The most frequently studied delivery models were integration (n = 59) and technology-based interventions (n = 55). Among product literature, only 15 studies included LMIC populations. Consultation with advocates highlighted the need for research on long-acting products, including among pediatric, pregnant, and breastfeeding PLHIV, PLHIV on second-line regimens, and key populations. Consultation also emphasized the need to understand preferences on clinic visit frequency, side effects, and choice. While the preference literature has expanded, gaps remain around long-acting regimens and their delivery. To fill these gaps, the research agenda must be guided by the priorities of communities of PLHIV.
在中低收入国家(LMICs),艾滋病毒治疗领域正在迅速发展,在冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,差异化服务提供(DSD)的扩大就是一个例证。长效产品代表了一个新的前沿领域,这将需要对卫生系统进行重大重新设计。了解艾滋病毒感染者(PLHIV)的服务提供和产品偏好,并确保证据的产生是由社区的优先事项指导,这一点至关重要。我们进行了范围界定审查,以确定偏好研究中的差距,并为未来的研究提供信息。从 2014 年 1 月至 2022 年 5 月发表的同行评审文章中,有资格入选的文章需报告了一个或多个服务提供或产品属性的 PLHIV 或照顾者的可接受性或偏好数据。服务提供研究仅限于 LMIC 人群,而产品研究则没有地域限制。根据确定的差距,我们咨询了倡导者,以制定社区主导的研究议程建议。在确定的 6493 项研究中,有 225 项关于服务提供属性的研究和 47 项关于产品偏好的研究符合条件。最常研究的交付模式是整合(n=59)和基于技术的干预措施(n=55)。在产品文献中,只有 15 项研究包括 LMIC 人群。与倡导者的磋商强调了需要开展长效产品的研究,包括儿科、怀孕和哺乳期 PLHIV、二线方案 PLHIV 以及重点人群的研究。磋商还强调了需要了解对就诊频率、副作用和选择的偏好。尽管偏好文献有所扩展,但长效方案及其交付方面仍存在差距。为了填补这些差距,研究议程必须由 PLHIV 社区的优先事项指导。