Onyishi Ike E, Nohe Christoph, Ugwu Fabian O, Amazue Lawrence O, Hertel Guido
Department of Psychology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
Chair of Organizational & Business Psychology at the University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 27;15:1403701. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1403701. eCollection 2024.
Typically, work engagement is positively related to beneficial job outcomes. Earlier studies, however, revealed a "dark side" of work engagement showing negative effects such as more work-family conflict. Using a resource perspective, our study seeks to better understand and these negative effects of work engagement occur. Specifically, we test a new model in which the relationship of work engagement with work-family conflict is mediated by organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and work rumination. Moreover, we argue that employees' resource-building strategies (i.e., job crafting) and resource levels (i.e., psychological capital) buffer resource depletion due to high work engagement.
We tested our assumptions in a field study that involved data collected on three measurement points with 523 employees from Nigeria. The measures consist of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale, Organizational Citizenship Behavior Scale, Work Rumination Scale, Psychological Capital Scale, Job Crafting Measure, Work-family Conflict Scale, and demographic variables. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was used to test the hypotheses.
Results from latent structure equation modelling confirm that work rumination mediates the positive relationship between work engagement and work-family conflict. Additionally, our findings suggest that behavioral engagement (i.e.,OCB) and work rumination mediate the relationship between work engagement and work-family conflict. Moreover, psychological capital mitigated the relationships of work engagement with work rumination, but not job crafting. Our study helps to better understand the "dark side" of work engagement and offers implications on how to mitigate its detrimental relationship with work-family conflict.
通常情况下,工作投入与有益的工作成果呈正相关。然而,早期研究揭示了工作投入的“阴暗面”,显示出诸如更多工作与家庭冲突等负面影响。从资源视角出发,我们的研究旨在更好地理解工作投入的这些负面影响是如何产生的。具体而言,我们测试了一个新模型,其中工作投入与工作家庭冲突之间的关系由组织公民行为(OCB)和工作反刍来介导。此外,我们认为员工的资源构建策略(即工作重塑)和资源水平(即心理资本)能够缓冲因高工作投入导致的资源耗竭。
我们在一项实地研究中检验了我们的假设,该研究涉及从尼日利亚的523名员工那里收集的三个测量点的数据。测量指标包括乌得勒支工作投入量表、组织公民行为量表、工作反刍量表、心理资本量表、工作重塑测量、工作家庭冲突量表以及人口统计学变量。采用结构方程模型(SEM)来检验假设。
潜在结构方程建模的结果证实,工作反刍介导了工作投入与工作家庭冲突之间的正向关系。此外,我们的研究结果表明,行为投入(即OCB)和工作反刍介导了工作投入与工作家庭冲突之间的关系。而且,心理资本减轻了工作投入与工作反刍之间的关系,但工作重塑没有。我们的研究有助于更好地理解工作投入的“阴暗面”,并就如何减轻其与工作家庭冲突的有害关系提供了启示。