Department of Psychology.
Gevirtz Graduate School of Education.
Psychol Methods. 2023 Feb;28(1):61-88. doi: 10.1037/met0000425. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
Model fit assessment is a central component of evaluating confirmatory factor analysis models and the validity of psychological assessments. Fit indices remain popular and researchers often judge fit with fixed cutoffs derived by Hu and Bentler (1999). Despite their overwhelming popularity, methodological studies have cautioned against fixed cutoffs, noting that the meaning of fit indices varies based on a complex interaction of model characteristics like factor reliability, number of items, and number of factors. Criticism of fixed cutoffs stems primarily from the fact that they were derived from one specific confirmatory factor analysis model and lack generalizability. To address this, we propose a simulation-based method called cutoffs such that derivation of cutoffs is adaptively tailored to the specific model and data characteristics being evaluated. Unlike previously proposed simulation-based techniques, our method removes existing barriers to implementation by providing an open-source, Web based Shiny software application that automates the entire process so that users neither need to manually write any software code nor be knowledgeable about foundations of Monte Carlo simulation. Additionally, we extend fit index cutoff derivations to include sets of cutoffs for multiple levels of misspecification. In doing so, fit indices can more closely resemble their originally intended purpose as effect sizes quantifying misfit rather than improperly functioning as ad hoc hypothesis tests. We also provide an approach specifically designed for the nuances of 1-factor models, which have received surprisingly little attention in the literature despite frequent substantive interests in unidimensionality. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
模型拟合评估是评估验证性因素分析模型和心理评估有效性的核心组成部分。拟合指数仍然很受欢迎,研究人员通常使用 Hu 和 Bentler(1999)提出的固定临界值来判断拟合度。尽管它们非常受欢迎,但方法学研究警告不要使用固定临界值,并指出拟合指数的含义因模型特征(如因素可靠性、项目数量和因素数量)的复杂相互作用而有所不同。对固定临界值的批评主要源于这样一个事实,即它们是从特定的验证性因素分析模型中得出的,缺乏普遍性。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一种基于模拟的方法,称为“自适应临界值”,以便根据正在评估的特定模型和数据特征自适应地调整临界值的推导。与以前提出的基于模拟的技术不同,我们的方法通过提供一个开源的基于网络的 Shiny 软件应用程序来消除实施的现有障碍,该应用程序自动执行整个过程,因此用户既不需要手动编写任何软件代码,也不需要了解蒙特卡罗模拟的基础。此外,我们将拟合指数临界值的推导扩展到包括多个误设定水平的成套临界值。这样,拟合指数可以更接近其最初的目的,即作为衡量不拟合程度的效应量,而不是不恰当地作为特定的假设检验。我们还提供了一种专门针对 1 因素模型细微差别的方法,尽管在文献中很少关注,但这些模型在一维性方面的实质性兴趣却令人惊讶。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。