Suppr超能文献

没人能去课间休息:儿童如何评估集体惩罚和针对性惩罚。

No one is going to recess: How children evaluate collective and targeted punishment.

作者信息

Thomas Sarah, Kelsey Caroline, Vaish Amrisha

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Developmental Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Soc Dev. 2024 May;33(2). doi: 10.1111/sode.12730. Epub 2024 Jan 4.

Abstract

This study examined children's responses to targeted and collective punishment. Thirty-six 4-5-year-olds and 36 6-7-year-olds (36 females; 54 White; data collected 2018-2019 in the United States) experienced three classroom punishment situations: Targeted (only transgressing student punished), Collective (one student transgressed, all students punished), and Baseline (all students transgressed, all punished). The older children evaluated collective punishment as less fair than targeted, whereas younger children evaluated both similarly. Across ages, children distributed fewer resources to teachers who administered collective than targeted punishment, and rated transgressors more negatively and distributed fewer resources to transgressors in Collective and Targeted than Baseline. These findings demonstrate children's increasing understanding of punishment and point to the potential impact of different forms of punishment on children's social lives.

摘要

本研究考察了儿童对针对性惩罚和集体惩罚的反应。三十六名4至5岁儿童和三十六名6至7岁儿童(36名女性;54名白人;2018年至2019年在美国收集数据)经历了三种课堂惩罚情境:针对性惩罚(仅惩罚违规学生)、集体惩罚(一名学生违规,全体学生受罚)和基线情境(所有学生都违规,全体受罚)。年龄较大的儿童认为集体惩罚不如针对性惩罚公平,而年龄较小的儿童对两者的评价相似。在各个年龄段,与实施针对性惩罚的教师相比,儿童分给实施集体惩罚教师的资源更少,并且对违规者的评价更负面,在集体惩罚和针对性惩罚情境中分给违规者的资源比在基线情境中更少。这些发现表明儿童对惩罚的理解在不断增强,并指出不同形式的惩罚对儿童社会生活的潜在影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10da/11238698/e4579bff68e7/nihms-2003224-f0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验