Louis P, Schoenen J, Hedman C
Cephalalgia. 1985 Sep;5(3):159-65. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1985.0503159.x.
In a double-blind, cross-over trial, the migraine prophylactic effect of the beta 1-adrenoceptor antagonist metoprolol was compared with that of clonidine. The dosage of metoprolol was 50 mg b.i.d. and of clonidine 50 micrograms b.i.d. Thirty-one patients were included; twenty-three completed the entire study. Six patients withdrew during clonidine treatment, one during metoprolol treatment and one during the wash-out period (placebo). Metoprolol had a significantly better migraine prophylactic effect than clonidine regarding such parameters as the attack frequency, the number of migraine days and the sum of intensity score. Compared to baseline (placebo), metoprolol decreased these parameters, while clonidine did not. Metoprolol, but not clonidine, also reduced the acute consumption of analgesics. No differences were found as regards side effects.
在一项双盲交叉试验中,比较了β1肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂美托洛尔与可乐定预防偏头痛的效果。美托洛尔的剂量为每日两次,每次50毫克;可乐定的剂量为每日两次,每次50微克。纳入31例患者,23例完成了整个研究。6例患者在可乐定治疗期间退出,1例在美托洛尔治疗期间退出,1例在洗脱期(安慰剂)退出。在发作频率、偏头痛天数和强度评分总和等参数方面,美托洛尔预防偏头痛的效果明显优于可乐定。与基线(安慰剂)相比,美托洛尔降低了这些参数,而可乐定则没有。美托洛尔还减少了镇痛药的急性用量,而可乐定没有。在副作用方面未发现差异。