Sax Dana R, Kene Mamata V, Huang Jie, Gopalan Anjali, Reed Mary E
Department of Emergency Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center, and Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, Pleasanton, CA, USA.
Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, Pleasanton, CA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Oct;39(13):2446-2453. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08885-6. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
Telemedicine use expanded greatly during the COVID-19 pandemic. More data is needed to understand how this shift may impact other venues of acute care delivery.
We evaluate the association of visit modality (telephone, video, or office) and downstream emergency department (ED) and hospital visits among primary care visits for acute, time-sensitive conditions.
Observational study of patient-scheduled primary care telemedicine and office visits for acute conditions (cardiac, gastrointestinal, neurologic, musculoskeletal, and head and neck) in a large, integrated healthcare delivery system.
Adults with a new self-booked primary care appointment for an eligible acute condition from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022 (with no primary care, ED, or hospital visits in prior 30 days).
Visit modality, including office, video, or telephone.
Seven-day ED and hospital utilization, adjusted for patient and visit characteristics.
Among 258,958 primary care visits by 239,240 adult patients, 57.7% were telemedicine visits; of these, 72.4% were telephone and 27.6% were video. Telephone visits were the timeliest, with over 70% of visits scheduled within 1 day of booking. Rates of 7-day ED utilization were low, and varied by condition group, with cardiac visits having the highest rates (4.8%) and musculoskeletal visits having the lowest (0.8%). There was less than a 1% absolute difference in ED use by visit modality for all condition types; however, telephone visits were associated with slightly higher rates than video visits. The 7-day hospitalization rate was less than 1% and observed between visit type differences varied by clinical condition.
Among office, telephone, and video visits in primary care for potentially high-risk, time-sensitive conditions, downstream ED and hospital use were uncommon. ED utilization was lower for video visits than telephone visits, although telephone visits were timelier and may offer a safe and accessible option for acute care.
在新冠疫情期间,远程医疗的使用大幅增加。需要更多数据来了解这一转变如何影响其他急性护理服务场所。
我们评估就诊方式(电话、视频或门诊)与因急性、时间敏感病症进行的初级保健就诊后下游急诊科(ED)就诊及住院情况之间的关联。
在一个大型综合医疗服务系统中,对患者预约的针对急性病症(心脏、胃肠、神经、肌肉骨骼及头颈部)的初级保健远程医疗和门诊就诊进行观察性研究。
2022年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间,为符合条件的急性病症新预约初级保健服务的成年人(过去30天内未进行过初级保健、急诊科或住院就诊)。
就诊方式,包括门诊、视频或电话。
调整患者和就诊特征后,7天内的急诊科和住院利用率。
在239,240名成年患者的258,958次初级保健就诊中,57.7%为远程医疗就诊;其中,72.4%为电话就诊,27.6%为视频就诊。电话就诊最及时,超过70%的就诊在预约后1天内安排。7天内的急诊科利用率较低,且因病症组而异,心脏疾病就诊的利用率最高(4.8%),肌肉骨骼疾病就诊的利用率最低(0.8%)。所有病症类型中,就诊方式导致的急诊科使用绝对差异不到1%;然而,电话就诊的使用率略高于视频就诊。7天住院率不到1%,不同就诊类型之间的差异因临床病症而异。
在针对潜在高风险、时间敏感病症的初级保健中,门诊、电话和视频就诊后,下游急诊科和住院使用情况并不常见。视频就诊的急诊科利用率低于电话就诊,尽管电话就诊更及时,可能为急性护理提供安全且便捷的选择。