State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 79 Qingchun Rd., Hangzhou 310003, China.
Nutrients. 2024 Jul 2;16(13):2114. doi: 10.3390/nu16132114.
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common gastrointestinal disorder with gut microbiota imbalance playing a significant role. There are increasing numbers of research studies exploring treatment options involving probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), but it is still uncertain which treatment option is superior. The research was conducted on various databases and unpublished trial data (up to February 2023). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were screened for adult patients with IBS comparing interventions with placebo. Probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and FMT were assessed for their impact using mean difference and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Out of 6528 articles, 54 were included for probiotics, 7 for prebiotics/synbiotics, and 6 for FMT. Probiotics showed improvement in IBS symptoms, particularly with and strains. Prebiotics and synbiotics did not show significant improvement. Network meta-analysis indicated the favorable effects of probiotics (OR = 0.53, 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.59) and FMT (OR = 0.46, 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.64) on IBS, with no serious adverse events reported. In short, probiotics and FMT are effective for managing IBS, with and being dominant strains. However, the most effective probiotic combination or strain remains unclear, while prebiotics and synbiotics did not show significant improvement.
肠易激综合征(IBS)是一种常见的胃肠道疾病,肠道微生物失衡在其中起着重要作用。越来越多的研究探索了涉及益生菌、益生元、合生菌和粪便微生物移植(FMT)的治疗选择,但哪种治疗选择更优仍不确定。本研究在各种数据库和未发表的试验数据(截至 2023 年 2 月)上进行。筛选了比较益生菌、益生元/合生菌和 FMT 与安慰剂干预的成人 IBS 患者的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用均数差和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析评估益生菌、益生元、合生菌和 FMT 的影响。在 6528 篇文章中,有 54 篇纳入了益生菌,7 篇纳入了益生元/合生菌,6 篇纳入了 FMT。益生菌显示出对 IBS 症状的改善,特别是 和 菌株。益生元和合生菌没有显示出显著的改善。网络荟萃分析表明益生菌(OR=0.53,95%CI,0.48 至 0.59)和 FMT(OR=0.46,95%CI,0.33 至 0.64)对 IBS 有有利影响,且未报告严重不良事件。总之,益生菌和 FMT 对 IBS 的管理有效, 和 是优势菌株。然而,最有效的益生菌组合或菌株仍不清楚,而益生元和合生菌没有显示出显著的改善。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-7-10
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-2-17
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-9-20
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-10-23
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-6-13
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2025-8
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2025-7-1
Cell Insight. 2025-1-10
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025-1-13
MedComm (2020). 2024-12-16
Mol Psychiatry. 2023-4
World J Gastroenterol. 2022-6-14