• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习能辅助诊断原发性免疫性血小板减少症吗?一项可行性研究。

Can Machine Learning Assist in Diagnosis of Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia? A Feasibility Study.

作者信息

Miah Haroon, Kollias Dimitrios, Pedone Giacinto Luca, Provan Drew, Chen Frederick

机构信息

Centre of Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AT, UK.

Haematology Department, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1BB, UK.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jun 26;14(13):1352. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14131352.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics14131352
PMID:39001244
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11240714/
Abstract

Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a rare autoimmune disease characterised by the immune-mediated destruction of peripheral blood platelets in patients leading to low platelet counts and bleeding. The diagnosis and effective management of ITP are challenging because there is no established test to confirm the disease and no biomarker with which one can predict the response to treatment and outcome. In this work, we conduct a feasibility study to check if machine learning can be applied effectively for the diagnosis of ITP using routine blood tests and demographic data in a non-acute outpatient setting. Various ML models, including Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, k-Nearest Neighbor, Decision Tree and Random Forest, were applied to data from the UK Adult ITP Registry and a general haematology clinic. Two different approaches were investigated: a demographic-unaware and a demographic-aware one. We conduct extensive experiments to evaluate the predictive performance of these models and approaches, as well as their bias. The results revealed that Decision Tree and Random Forest models were both superior and fair, achieving nearly perfect predictive and fairness scores, with platelet count identified as the most significant variable. Models not provided with demographic information performed better in terms of predictive accuracy but showed lower fairness scores, illustrating a trade-off between predictive performance and fairness.

摘要

原发性免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)是一种罕见的自身免疫性疾病,其特征是患者外周血血小板受到免疫介导的破坏,导致血小板计数降低和出血。ITP的诊断和有效管理具有挑战性,因为没有确定的检测方法来确诊该疾病,也没有生物标志物可用于预测治疗反应和结果。在这项研究中,我们进行了一项可行性研究,以检验机器学习是否可以利用非急性门诊环境中的常规血液检测和人口统计学数据有效地用于ITP的诊断。各种机器学习模型,包括逻辑回归、支持向量机、k近邻、决策树和随机森林,被应用于来自英国成人ITP登记处和一家普通血液学诊所的数据。研究了两种不同的方法:一种不考虑人口统计学因素,另一种考虑人口统计学因素。我们进行了广泛的实验,以评估这些模型和方法的预测性能及其偏差。结果表明,决策树和随机森林模型均表现出色且较为公平,预测和公平性得分近乎完美,血小板计数被确定为最显著的变量。未提供人口统计学信息的模型在预测准确性方面表现更好,但公平性得分较低,这说明了预测性能和公平性之间的权衡。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/31156d0b74d1/diagnostics-14-01352-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/6aa6b834fcaf/diagnostics-14-01352-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/339ee9760563/diagnostics-14-01352-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/fae07abd8206/diagnostics-14-01352-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/e534a3564729/diagnostics-14-01352-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/2fac1a55a7cd/diagnostics-14-01352-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/cb7ea30f90b4/diagnostics-14-01352-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/2d704d6641ef/diagnostics-14-01352-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/8b8e297cbda3/diagnostics-14-01352-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/2d29004d5c0a/diagnostics-14-01352-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/5e546aca5566/diagnostics-14-01352-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/6de9e36a2593/diagnostics-14-01352-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/cb0bfe53652c/diagnostics-14-01352-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/0fa9b772f909/diagnostics-14-01352-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/f94e8fcbe590/diagnostics-14-01352-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/82fa8b80bd50/diagnostics-14-01352-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/e44a3e109012/diagnostics-14-01352-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/5f0ef73d2b14/diagnostics-14-01352-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/976c7ed7f60a/diagnostics-14-01352-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/31156d0b74d1/diagnostics-14-01352-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/6aa6b834fcaf/diagnostics-14-01352-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/339ee9760563/diagnostics-14-01352-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/fae07abd8206/diagnostics-14-01352-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/e534a3564729/diagnostics-14-01352-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/2fac1a55a7cd/diagnostics-14-01352-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/cb7ea30f90b4/diagnostics-14-01352-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/2d704d6641ef/diagnostics-14-01352-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/8b8e297cbda3/diagnostics-14-01352-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/2d29004d5c0a/diagnostics-14-01352-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/5e546aca5566/diagnostics-14-01352-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/6de9e36a2593/diagnostics-14-01352-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/cb0bfe53652c/diagnostics-14-01352-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/0fa9b772f909/diagnostics-14-01352-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/f94e8fcbe590/diagnostics-14-01352-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/82fa8b80bd50/diagnostics-14-01352-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/e44a3e109012/diagnostics-14-01352-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/5f0ef73d2b14/diagnostics-14-01352-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/976c7ed7f60a/diagnostics-14-01352-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c43/11240714/31156d0b74d1/diagnostics-14-01352-g019.jpg

相似文献

1
Can Machine Learning Assist in Diagnosis of Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia? A Feasibility Study.机器学习能辅助诊断原发性免疫性血小板减少症吗?一项可行性研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jun 26;14(13):1352. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14131352.
2
Artificial intelligence in clinical care amidst COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.COVID-19大流行期间临床护理中的人工智能:一项系统综述。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021;19:2833-2850. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.05.010. Epub 2021 May 7.
3
The Impact of Time Horizon on Classification Accuracy: Application of Machine Learning to Prediction of Incident Coronary Heart Disease.时间范围对分类准确性的影响:机器学习在预测冠心病发病中的应用。
JMIR Cardio. 2022 Nov 2;6(2):e38040. doi: 10.2196/38040.
4
Machine learning models developed and internally validated for predicting chronicity in pediatric immune thrombocytopenia.用于预测儿童免疫性血小板减少症慢性化的机器学习模型的开发和内部验证。
J Thromb Haemost. 2024 Apr;22(4):1167-1178. doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2023.12.006. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
5
Development and internal validation of a clinical prediction model for the diagnosis of immune thrombocytopenia.中文译文:免疫性血小板减少症诊断的临床预测模型的建立和内部验证。
J Thromb Haemost. 2022 Dec;20(12):2988-2997. doi: 10.1111/jth.15885. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
6
Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia: Novel Insights into Pathophysiology and Disease Management.原发性免疫性血小板减少症:病理生理学与疾病管理的新见解
J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 16;10(4):789. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040789.
7
Evaluation of the immature platelet fraction in the diagnosis and prognosis of childhood immune thrombocytopenia.未成熟血小板分数在儿童免疫性血小板减少症诊断和预后中的评估
Platelets. 2015;26(7):645-50. doi: 10.3109/09537104.2014.969220. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
8
CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF EXTENDED PLATELET INDICES IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF IMMUNE THROMBOCYTOPENIA.血小板参数延长在免疫性血小板减少症诊断中的临床意义。
Acta Clin Croat. 2021 Dec;60(4):665-674. doi: 10.20471/acc.2021.60.04.14.
9
Metabolomics profile and machine learning prediction of treatment responses in immune thrombocytopenia: A prospective cohort study.免疫性血小板减少症治疗反应的代谢组学特征和机器学习预测:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Br J Haematol. 2024 Jun;204(6):2405-2417. doi: 10.1111/bjh.19391. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
10
Development and validation of a web-based artificial intelligence prediction model to assess massive intraoperative blood loss for metastatic spinal disease using machine learning techniques.开发和验证一种基于网络的人工智能预测模型,使用机器学习技术评估转移性脊柱疾病的术中大量失血。
Spine J. 2024 Jan;24(1):146-160. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.09.001. Epub 2023 Sep 11.

引用本文的文献

1
A CNN-Transformer Fusion Model for Proactive Detection of Schizophrenia Relapse from EEG Signals.一种用于从脑电图信号中主动检测精神分裂症复发的卷积神经网络-Transformer融合模型。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Jun 12;12(6):641. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12060641.

本文引用的文献

1
A life-threatening bleeding prediction model for immune thrombocytopenia based on personalized machine learning: a nationwide prospective cohort study.基于个性化机器学习的免疫性血小板减少症致命性出血预测模型:一项全国范围前瞻性队列研究。
Sci Bull (Beijing). 2023 Sep 30;68(18):2106-2114. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2023.08.001. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
2
Developing and validating a mortality prediction model for ICH in ITP: a nationwide representative multicenter study.开发和验证 ITP 中 ICH 死亡率预测模型:一项全国代表性多中心研究。
Blood Adv. 2022 Jul 26;6(14):4320-4329. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007226.
3
Incidence of adult primary immune thrombocytopenia in England-An update.
英格兰成人原发性免疫性血小板减少症的发病率——最新情况
Eur J Haematol. 2022 Sep;109(3):238-249. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13803. Epub 2022 Jun 26.
4
Recent advances in the mechanisms and treatment of immune thrombocytopenia.免疫性血小板减少症发病机制及治疗的新进展。
EBioMedicine. 2022 Feb;76:103820. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103820. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
5
Overview of artificial intelligence in medicine.医学中的人工智能概述。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Jul;8(7):2328-2331. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_440_19.
6
Decision tree methods: applications for classification and prediction.决策树方法:分类与预测应用
Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2015 Apr 25;27(2):130-5. doi: 10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.215044.
7
Permutation importance: a corrected feature importance measure.排列重要性:一种修正的特征重要性度量。
Bioinformatics. 2010 May 15;26(10):1340-7. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq134. Epub 2010 Apr 12.