Suppr超能文献

内镜与显微镜镫骨切开术在同一患者中的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。

Comparison of endoscopic and microscopic stapedotomy in the same patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kızıltepe State Hospital, Mardin, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Nov;281(11):5753-5761. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08823-6. Epub 2024 Jul 13.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to conduct a comparative analysis of audiological and postoperative clinical outcomes between the endoscopic and microscopic stapedotomy approaches.

METHODS

This study employed a randomized, controlled design. Twenty-seven patients with bilateral otosclerosis underwent stapedotomy in both ears, with randomized allocation of the surgical technique (endoscopic vs. microscopic) for the first operated ear. Air-bone gap (ABG) and ABG gain were measured at least 12 months postoperatively. Postoperative outcomes including pain (Visual Analog Scale-VAS), dizziness, early-term (day 1) and late-term (6 months) dysgeusia were evaluated. The Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) assessed health-related quality of life at one month postoperatively, and operative time was measured.

RESULTS

This study compared endoscopic (n = 27 ears) and microscopic (n = 27 ears) stapedotomy for otosclerosis. Both groups achieved similar hearing improvement with no significant differences in pre-operative and post-operative bone/air conduction thresholds, ABG, and ABG gain (all p > 0.05). The endoscopic stapedotomy group demonstrated reduced postoperative pain (lower VAS scores, p < 0.001), lower early dysgeusia (3.7% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.005), shorter operative time (47.3 vs. 75.4 min, p < 0.001) and improved patient-reported outcomes (higher GBI score, p = 0.014) when compared to microscopic stapedotomy group. No significant differences were observed in postoperative dizziness or late-term dysgeusia between groups.

CONCLUSION

This study found similar hearing improvement with both endoscopic and microscopic stapedotomy for otosclerosis. However, the endoscopic approach showed advantages in reduced postoperative pain, early dysgeusia, and operative time, with improved patient-reported quality of life. These findings suggest endoscopic stapedotomy as a valuable alternative to the conventional microscopic approach.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在对比分析耳内镜下与显微镜下镫骨切开术的听力及术后临床疗效。

方法

本研究采用随机对照设计。27 例双侧耳硬化症患者双耳均行镫骨切开术,其中 1 耳采用内镜下技术(内镜组),另 1 耳采用显微镜下技术(显微镜组)。术后至少 12 个月测量气骨导差(ABG)和 ABG 差值。评估术后疼痛(视觉模拟评分法-VAS)、头晕、早发性(术后第 1 天)和迟发性(6 个月)味觉障碍。术后 1 个月采用格拉斯哥结局量表(GBI)评估健康相关生活质量,测量手术时间。

结果

本研究对比分析了耳内镜(n=27 耳)与显微镜(n=27 耳)下镫骨切开术治疗耳硬化症的疗效。两组患者术后听力均有显著改善,术前和术后骨气导差值、ABG 和 ABG 差值均无显著差异(均 P>0.05)。内镜组术后疼痛较轻(VAS 评分较低,P<0.001),早发性味觉障碍发生率较低(3.7% vs. 33.3%,P=0.005),手术时间较短(47.3 分钟 vs. 75.4 分钟,P<0.001),患者报告结局(GBI 评分较高,P=0.014)更好。两组术后头晕和迟发性味觉障碍发生率无显著差异。

结论

本研究发现耳内镜下与显微镜下镫骨切开术治疗耳硬化症均能获得相似的听力改善。然而,内镜下技术在减轻术后疼痛、早发性味觉障碍和缩短手术时间方面具有优势,同时提高了患者报告的生活质量。这些结果表明,内镜下镫骨切开术是传统显微镜下技术的一种有价值的替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验