• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

YouTube 上钬激光前列腺剜除术相关视频的质量与可靠性分析。

Quality and Reliability Analysis of Videos About Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate on YouTube.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Ministry of Health Mamak State Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Urology, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Urology. 2024 Oct;192:105-110. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.07.008. Epub 2024 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2024.07.008
PMID:39002845
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the reliability and quality analyses of thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) videos on YouTube, as a source of public information.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, a YouTube search with the keyword "ThuLEP" was performed on November 15, 2022 and 142 videos were listed according to relevance. Video features and source of upload were recorded. The quality of videos was evaluated by using both the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) score and the Global Quality Score (GQS); the reliability of videos was evaluated by using 5-point modified DISCERN tool, respectively. The correlation analysis was performed by using Spearman test between video features and these three scores.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven videos were analyzed after exclusion and the most common source of upload were urologists (54.5%) and the videos containing only ThuLEP surgery (74%) were the majority of the videos. The median JAMA score, 5-point modified DISCERN score, and GQS were 2, 1, and 1, respectively. There were no statistical differences in these three scores according to the source of the upload. All three scores were analyzed separately by language and no significant statistical difference was found. There was a positive correlation between the video power index and as well as JAMA, GQS, and m.DISCERN scores.

CONCLUSION

Despite abundant videos on ThuLEP on YouTube, most of these videos are not targeted to public and information provided may not be as useful for patients. Information presented in these videos may be inaccurate and not reliable.

摘要

目的

评估 YouTube 上钬激光前列腺剜除术(ThuLEP)视频的可靠性和质量分析,作为公众信息的来源。

材料与方法

本研究于 2022 年 11 月 15 日在 YouTube 上使用“ThuLEP”关键词进行搜索,根据相关性列出了 142 个视频。记录视频特征和上传来源。使用美国医学会(JAMA)评分和全球质量评分(GQS)评估视频质量;使用 5 分改良 DISCERN 工具评估视频的可靠性。使用 Spearman 检验对视频特征与这三个评分进行相关性分析。

结果

排除后分析了 77 个视频,最常见的上传来源是泌尿科医生(54.5%),且包含仅 ThuLEP 手术的视频(74%)占大多数。中位数 JAMA 评分、5 分改良 DISCERN 评分和 GQS 分别为 2、1 和 1。上传来源对这三个评分没有统计学差异。按语言分别分析这三个评分,没有显著的统计学差异。视频功率指数与 JAMA、GQS 和 m.DISCERN 评分呈正相关。

结论

尽管 YouTube 上有大量关于 ThuLEP 的视频,但大多数视频并非针对公众,提供的信息可能对患者没有帮助。这些视频中呈现的信息可能不准确且不可靠。

相似文献

1
Quality and Reliability Analysis of Videos About Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate on YouTube.YouTube 上钬激光前列腺剜除术相关视频的质量与可靠性分析。
Urology. 2024 Oct;192:105-110. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.07.008. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
2
Aspergillosis on YouTube: Assessment of Quality and Reliability of Uploaded Videos.YouTube上的曲霉病:对上传视频质量和可靠性的评估。
Mycopathologia. 2025 Jun 23;190(4):57. doi: 10.1007/s11046-025-00967-1.
3
Search engines and short video apps as sources of information on acute pancreatitis in China: quality assessment and content assessment.中国搜索引擎和短视频应用作为急性胰腺炎信息来源的质量评估与内容评估
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 4;13:1578076. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1578076. eCollection 2025.
4
Evaluating the quality and reliability of youtube videos on Hirschsprung's disease: a comprehensive analysis for patients, parents and health professionals.评估YouTube上关于先天性巨结肠症视频的质量和可靠性:针对患者、家长及医疗专业人员的全面分析
Pediatr Surg Int. 2025 Jun 17;41(1):173. doi: 10.1007/s00383-025-06064-0.
5
Assessment of the quality and reliability of Turkish YouTube videos on frozen shoulder exercises.关于肩周炎锻炼的土耳其语YouTube视频的质量与可靠性评估
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2025 Jul;38(4):810-816. doi: 10.1177/10538127251317661. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
6
Holmium Versus Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.钬激光与铥激光前列腺剜除术的比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Mar;8(2):545-554. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.03.024. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
7
YouTube and Bilibili as sources of information on oral cancer: cross-sectional content analysis study.YouTube和哔哩哔哩作为口腔癌信息来源:横断面内容分析研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21671. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02898-9.
8
Evaluating the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos Providing Nutritional Recommendations for Irritable Bowel Syndrome.评估YouTube上为肠易激综合征提供营养建议的视频的质量和可靠性。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2025 Aug;38(4):e70088. doi: 10.1111/jhn.70088.
9
YouTube as a Source for Arabic-Speaking Parent Education on the Oral Hygiene of Children: A Social Media Content Analysis.YouTube作为阿拉伯语家长儿童口腔卫生教育的来源:一项社交媒体内容分析
Public Health Nurs. 2025 Jul-Aug;42(4):1469-1477. doi: 10.1111/phn.13551. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
10
Evaluation of the Educational Value, Reliability, and Quality of Vaginally-Assisted Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (v-NOTES) Videos on YouTube.YouTube上经阴道辅助的自然腔道内镜手术(v-NOTES)视频的教育价值、可靠性及质量评估
Cureus. 2025 Jun 2;17(6):e85244. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85244. eCollection 2025 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality and reliability of YouTube videos on fascial sling surgery.YouTube上关于筋膜悬吊手术视频的质量与可靠性
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2025 Aug 8;71(7):e20250140. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20250140. eCollection 2025.