• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

极端肿瘤整形术:与乳房切除术相比具有肿瘤安全性。

Extreme Oncoplasty: Oncologically Safe When Compared with Mastectomy.

机构信息

Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA.

Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(11):7284-7288. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15791-y. Epub 2024 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-024-15791-y
PMID:39003382
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11452462/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Extreme oncoplasty is a breast-conserving operation using oncoplastic techniques in a patient who does not meet the traditional criteria for breast conservation and in whom most physicians would suggest a mastectomy. These tumors are generally multicentric and/or multifocal, they span more than 50 mm, or they can be large recurrences in a previously irradiated breast.

METHODS

A prospective single institution database was queried from 2008 through mid 2023 for patients who met the criteria for extreme oncoplasty and were treated with excision plus whole-breast radiation therapy (WBRT) or mastectomy without WBRT. Patients with recurrent breast cancer were excluded. Endpoints were local, regional, and distant recurrence as well as overall and breast-cancer-specific survival.

RESULTS

272 patients were treated with oncoplastic mammaplasty, using a standard or split reduction excision followed by postoperative WBRT. An additional 101 patients elected to be treated with mastectomy without postoperative radiation therapy. With a median follow-up of 7 years, there were no significant differences in local, regional, or distant recurrence, nor in breast-cancer-specific survival or overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

We strongly support extreme oncoplasty plus WBRT as the default procedure of choice for patients with large multifocal/multicentric lesions amenable to reconstruction with volume displacement mammaplasty.

摘要

背景

极限肿瘤整形术是一种在不符合保乳传统标准的患者中使用肿瘤整形技术进行的保乳手术,大多数医生会建议这类患者进行乳房切除术。这些肿瘤通常是多中心和/或多灶性的,肿瘤直径超过 50 毫米,或者是在先前接受过放疗的乳房中出现的大的复发性肿瘤。

方法

从 2008 年到 2023 年年中,对符合极限肿瘤整形术标准并接受切除加全乳放疗(WBRT)或不进行 WBRT 的乳房切除术的患者,在一个机构的前瞻性单数据库中进行了查询。排除了复发性乳腺癌患者。终点是局部、区域和远处复发以及总生存率和乳腺癌特异性生存率。

结果

272 例患者接受了肿瘤整形乳房切除术,采用标准或部分乳房缩小切除术,然后进行术后 WBRT。另外 101 例患者选择不进行术后放疗的乳房切除术。中位随访 7 年,局部、区域或远处复发,以及乳腺癌特异性生存率或总生存率均无显著差异。

结论

我们强烈支持极限肿瘤整形术加 WBRT 作为适合进行容积移位肿瘤整形术重建的多灶性/多中心大病灶患者的首选治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a25b/11452462/2128411c2985/10434_2024_15791_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a25b/11452462/2128411c2985/10434_2024_15791_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a25b/11452462/2128411c2985/10434_2024_15791_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Extreme Oncoplasty: Oncologically Safe When Compared with Mastectomy.极端肿瘤整形术:与乳房切除术相比具有肿瘤安全性。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(11):7284-7288. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15791-y. Epub 2024 Jul 13.
2
Extreme oncoplasty: breast conservation for patients who need mastectomy.极限肿瘤整形术:为需要乳房切除术的患者保留乳房。
Breast J. 2015 Jan-Feb;21(1):52-9. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12356. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
3
Breast Conservation Project: Clinical Outcomes of Extreme Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Therapy Versus Mastectomy for Large and Multiple Lesions.保乳项目:极量肿瘤整形保乳术与乳房切除术治疗大肿瘤及多发病灶的临床结局对比。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(11):7582-7593. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15799-4. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
4
Extreme oncoplasty: Expanding indications for breast conservation.极致肿瘤整形保乳术:扩大保乳适应证。
Am J Surg. 2019 May;217(5):851-856. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
5
Oncoplastic breast conservation surgery is oncologically safe when compared to wide local excision and mastectomy.与广泛局部切除和乳房切除术相比,肿瘤整形保乳手术在肿瘤学上是安全的。
Breast. 2017 Apr;32:179-185. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.02.006. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
6
Comparing Costs: Does Extreme Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery Confer a Cost Benefit When Compared with Mastectomy and Reconstruction?比较成本:与乳房切除术和重建相比,极端肿瘤整形保乳手术是否具有成本效益?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(11):7463-7470. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15711-0. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
7
Extreme oncoplastic conservation is a safe new alternative to mastectomy.极端肿瘤整形保乳术是一种安全的新选择,可以替代乳房切除术。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jan;46(1):71-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.09.004. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
8
Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery for Synchronous Multicentric and Multifocal Tumors: Is It Oncologically Safe? A Retrospective Matched-Cohort Analysis.同期多中心、多灶性肿瘤的肿瘤整形保乳术:其在肿瘤学上是否安全?一项回顾性匹配队列分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Jan;29(1):427-436. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10800-w. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
9
Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery for Tumors Larger than 2 Centimeters: Is it Oncologically Safe? A Matched-Cohort Analysis.针对直径大于2厘米肿瘤的肿瘤整形保乳手术:其肿瘤学安全性如何?一项配对队列分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun;23(6):1852-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5124-4. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
10
Early Postoperative Complications after Oncoplastic Reduction.肿瘤整形复位术后的早期并发症
South Med J. 2017 Oct;110(10):660-666. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000706.

引用本文的文献

1
Cohort study comparing volume replacement oncoplastic breast surgery with standard wide local excision for breast cancer.一项队列研究,比较乳腺癌容积置换肿瘤整形乳房手术与标准广泛局部切除手术。
Gland Surg. 2025 Feb 28;14(2):129-138. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-385. Epub 2025 Feb 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Local Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Therapy in Patients With Multiple Ipsilateral Breast Cancer: Results From ACOSOG Z11102 (Alliance).多灶性同侧乳腺癌患者保乳治疗后的局部复发:ACOSOG Z11102(Alliance)研究结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jun 10;41(17):3184-3193. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02553. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
2
Early Trajectories of Patient Reported Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Lumpectomy Versus Mastectomy.保乳手术与乳房切除术患者的患者报告结局的早期轨迹。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;28(10):5677-5685. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10450-y. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
3
Survival After Breast Conservation vs Mastectomy Adjusted for Comorbidity and Socioeconomic Status: A Swedish National 6-Year Follow-up of 48 986 Women.
保乳与乳房切除术治疗后的生存比较:调整合并症和社会经济地位因素后,瑞典全国 6 年随访 48986 例女性。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Jul 1;156(7):628-637. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.1438.
4
Comparing Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients Who Underwent Mastectomy Versus Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.比较乳腺癌患者行乳房切除术与保乳手术的生活质量:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 6;16(24):4970. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16244970.
5
Surgical trends in breast cancer: a rise in novel operative treatment options over a 12 year analysis.乳腺癌手术治疗趋势:12 年分析中新型手术治疗选择的增加。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jan;173(2):267-274. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-5018-1. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
6
Patient-Reported Outcomes Are Better after Oncoplastic Breast Conservation than after Mastectomy and Autologous Reconstruction.患者报告的结果显示,肿瘤整形保乳术后的效果优于乳房切除术后自体乳房重建。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Jul 24;5(7):e1419. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001419. eCollection 2017 Jul.
7
10 year survival after breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy compared with mastectomy in early breast cancer in the Netherlands: a population-based study.荷兰保乳手术联合放疗与乳房切除术治疗早期乳腺癌的 10 年生存比较:一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1158-1170. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30067-5. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
8
Radical Mastectomy to Radical Conservation (Extreme Oncoplasty): A Revolutionary Change.从根治性乳房切除术到根治性保留术(极致肿瘤整形术):一场革命性变革。
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jan;222(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.10.007.
9
Breast conservation versus mastectomy for patients with T3 primary tumors (>5 cm): A review of 5685 medicare patients.T3期原发性肿瘤(>5厘米)患者的保乳手术与乳房切除术:对5685名医疗保险患者的回顾
Cancer. 2016 Jan 1;122(1):42-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29726. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
10
Radiation-induced fibrosis: mechanisms and implications for therapy.辐射诱导的纤维化:机制及其对治疗的影响
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov;141(11):1985-94. doi: 10.1007/s00432-015-1974-6. Epub 2015 Apr 25.