• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过基于任务的数据可视化和算法洞察的集成来增强临床医生的分析工作流程:一项以用户为中心的设计研究。

Augmenting clinicians' analytical workflow through task-based integration of data visualizations and algorithmic insights: a user-centered design study.

机构信息

School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.

Department of Medicine, Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Nov 1;31(11):2455-2473. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae183.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocae183
PMID:39003519
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11491654/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To understand healthcare providers' experiences of using GlucoGuide, a mockup tool that integrates visual data analysis with algorithmic insights to support clinicians' use of patientgenerated data from Type 1 diabetes devices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This qualitative study was conducted in three phases. In Phase 1, 11 clinicians reviewed data using commercial diabetes platforms in a think-aloud data walkthrough activity followed by semistructured interviews. In Phase 2, GlucoGuide was developed. In Phase 3, the same clinicians reviewed data using GlucoGuide in a think-aloud activity followed by semistructured interviews. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyze transcripts of Phase 1 and Phase 3 think-aloud activity and interview.

RESULTS

3 high level tasks, 8 sub-tasks, and 4 challenges were identified in Phase 1. In Phase 2, 3 requirements for GlucoGuide were identified. Phase 3 results suggested that clinicians found GlucoGuide easier to use and experienced a lower cognitive burden as compared to the commercial diabetes data reports that were used in Phase 1. Additionally, GlucoGuide addressed the challenges experienced in Phase 1.

DISCUSSION

The study suggests that the knowledge of analytical tasks and task-specific visualization strategies in implementing features of data interfaces can result in tools that lower the perceived burden of engaging with data. Additionally, supporting clinicians in contextualizing algorithmic insights by visual analysis of relevant data can positively influence clinicians' willingness to leverage algorithmic support.

CONCLUSION

Task-aligned tools that combine multiple data-driven approaches, such as visualization strategies and algorithmic insights, can improve clinicians' experience in reviewing device data.

摘要

目的

了解医疗保健提供者使用 GlucoGuide 的体验,GlucoGuide 是一款模拟工具,将可视化数据分析与算法洞察相结合,以支持临床医生使用来自 1 型糖尿病设备的患者生成数据。

材料和方法

这项定性研究分三个阶段进行。在第 1 阶段,11 名临床医生在数据走查活动中通过大声思考使用商业糖尿病平台审查数据,然后进行半结构化访谈。在第 2 阶段,开发了 GlucoGuide。在第 3 阶段,相同的临床医生在大声思考活动中使用 GlucoGuide 审查数据,然后进行半结构化访谈。使用归纳主题分析对第 1 阶段和第 3 阶段大声思考活动和访谈的转录本进行分析。

结果

在第 1 阶段确定了 3 个高级任务、8 个子任务和 4 个挑战。在第 2 阶段,确定了 GlucoGuide 的 3 项要求。第 3 阶段的结果表明,与第 1 阶段使用的商业糖尿病数据报告相比,临床医生发现 GlucoGuide 更易于使用,认知负担更低。此外,GlucoGuide 解决了第 1 阶段遇到的挑战。

讨论

该研究表明,在实现数据接口功能时,了解分析任务和特定于任务的可视化策略的知识可以导致降低与数据交互的感知负担的工具。此外,通过对相关数据的可视化分析来支持临床医生理解算法洞察,可以积极影响临床医生利用算法支持的意愿。

结论

结合多种数据驱动方法(如可视化策略和算法洞察)的任务对齐工具可以改善临床医生审查设备数据的体验。

相似文献

1
Augmenting clinicians' analytical workflow through task-based integration of data visualizations and algorithmic insights: a user-centered design study.通过基于任务的数据可视化和算法洞察的集成来增强临床医生的分析工作流程:一项以用户为中心的设计研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Nov 1;31(11):2455-2473. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae183.
2
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Exploring Clinicians' and Patients' Acceptance and Utilization of a Digital Solution to Support Individualized Care in Diabetes Specialist Outpatient Care (DigiDiaS): Qualitative Study.探索临床医生和患者对支持糖尿病专科门诊个性化护理的数字解决方案(DigiDiaS)的接受度和使用率:定性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Jul 8;12:e70301. doi: 10.2196/70301.
4
mindLAMPVis as a Co-Designed Clinician-Facing Data Visualization Portal to Integrate Clinical Observations From Digital Phenotyping in Schizophrenia: User-Centered Design Process and Pilot Implementation.mindLAMPVis作为一个共同设计的面向临床医生的数据可视化门户,用于整合精神分裂症数字表型分析中的临床观察结果:以用户为中心的设计过程和试点实施。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 10;9:e70073. doi: 10.2196/70073.
5
Identifying Design Requirements for an Interactive Physiotherapy Dashboard With Decision Support for Clinical Movement Analysis of Musicians With Musculoskeletal Problems: Qualitative User Research Study.确定用于患有肌肉骨骼问题的音乐家临床运动分析的具有决策支持功能的交互式物理治疗仪表板的设计要求:定性用户研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Jul 16;12:e65029. doi: 10.2196/65029.
6
Hybrid closed-loop systems for managing blood glucose levels in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and economic modelling.用于管理1型糖尿病患者血糖水平的混合闭环系统:系统评价与经济建模
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Dec;28(80):1-190. doi: 10.3310/JYPL3536.
7
Designing Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS)-A User-Centered Lens of the Design Characteristics, Challenges, and Implications: Systematic Review.设计临床决策支持系统(CDSS)——基于用户中心视角的设计特征、挑战及影响:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 20;27:e63733. doi: 10.2196/63733.
8
Technology Integration to Support Nurses in an "Inpatient Room of the Future": Qualitative Analysis.技术整合以支持护士在“未来住院病房”中的工作:定性分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 16;27:e68689. doi: 10.2196/68689.
9
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
10
GamePlan4Care, a Web-Based Adaptation of the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health II Intervention for Family Caregivers of Persons Living With Dementia: Formative, Qualitative Usability Testing Study.GamePlan4Care,一种基于网络的针对痴呆症患者家庭照顾者的增强阿尔茨海默病照顾者健康II干预资源改编版:形成性、定性可用性测试研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 11;9:e60143. doi: 10.2196/60143.

引用本文的文献

1
Reflections on interactive visualization of electronic health records: past, present, future.关于电子健康记录交互式可视化的思考:过去、现在与未来
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Nov 1;31(11):2423-2428. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae249.

本文引用的文献

1
Twelve tips for applying the think-aloud method to capture cognitive processes.应用出声思维法捕捉认知过程的 12 个技巧。
Med Teach. 2024 Jul;46(7):892-897. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2023.2289847. Epub 2023 Dec 10.
2
Explainable medical imaging AI needs human-centered design: guidelines and evidence from a systematic review.可解释的医学影像人工智能需要以人类为中心的设计:系统评价的指南与证据
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Oct 19;5(1):156. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00699-2.
3
Exploring Human-Data Interaction in Clinical Decision-making Using Scenarios: Co-design Study.使用情景探索临床决策中的人机数据交互:协同设计研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 May 6;9(2):e32456. doi: 10.2196/32456.
4
Next-Generation Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosis: From Predicting Diagnostic Labels to "Wayfinding".用于诊断的下一代人工智能:从预测诊断标签到“路径导航”。
JAMA. 2021 Dec 28;326(24):2467-2468. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.22396.
5
Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests.定性研究中饱和度的样本量:实证检验的系统综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114523. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
6
Feasibility of Electronic Health Record Assessment of 6 Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes Self-management Habits and Their Association With Glycemic Outcomes.电子健康记录评估 6 项儿科 1 型糖尿病自我管理习惯的可行性及其与血糖控制结果的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2131278. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.31278.
7
Integrating Continuous Glucose Monitoring Into Clinical Practices and Patients' Lives.将持续血糖监测融入临床实践和患者生活。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 Sep;23(S3):S72-S80. doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0233.
8
Between a logic of disruption and a logic of continuation: Negotiating the legitimacy of algorithms used in automated clinical decision-making.在颠覆逻辑与延续逻辑之间:协商自动化临床决策中使用的算法的合法性
Health (London). 2023 Jan;27(1):41-59. doi: 10.1177/1363459321996741. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
9
Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective.人工智能在医疗保健中的可解释性:多学科视角。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Nov 30;20(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01332-6.
10
Digital health data-driven approaches to understand human behavior.利用数字健康数据驱动的方法来理解人类行为。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 Jan;46(1):191-196. doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-0761-5. Epub 2020 Jul 12.