Exploring Clinicians' and Patients' Acceptance and Utilization of a Digital Solution to Support Individualized Care in Diabetes Specialist Outpatient Care (DigiDiaS): Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND

With the increasing prevalence of type 1 diabetes alongside limited health care resources, the need for more sustainable health care services is apparent. Central to ensuring the standard of diabetes care while simultaneously optimizing resource utilization is improved patient-clinician communication and the provision of individualized care. Digital outpatient solutions incorporating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been introduced in diabetes outpatient care over recent years; however, features and delivery methods differ, and existing studies on their use and perceived clinical value are limited. Furthermore, clinicians' acceptance has been suggested as a key factor in the sustainability of digital solutions. Thus, to support the implementation of digital outpatient solutions perceived as valuable by clinicians and patients, we need more knowledge about how they are accepted and utilized in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates how clinicians and patients with type 1 diabetes accept and utilize a digital outpatient solution to support individualized care in the context of full-scale implementation at a diabetes specialist outpatient clinic. Furthermore, we aim to explore the synchronous interaction between patients and clinicians when they are allowed to prepare through the filling and reviewing of asynchronous PROMs before consultations.

METHODS

This qualitative study uses interpretive description as a methodological approach. The digital outpatient solution features various components, including PROM questionnaires, asynchronous chat, remote consultations, e-learning, and information distribution. Data were collected through semistructured interviews with 10 clinicians and 20 patients with type 1 diabetes and observations of consultations. The data from the patient and clinician interviews (267 A4 pages) were analyzed separately before being jointly analyzed in the context of the findings from the observations (40 A4 pages).

RESULTS

Our analysis resulted in the following three main themes that describe the interplay between clinicians' and patients' acceptance, utilization, and perceived clinical value of a digital outpatient solution: (1) clinicians' acceptance of the digital outpatient solution influences patients' acceptance, (2) variations in the use of different features influence the extent of individualized care, and (3) clinicians' and patients' utilization influences perceived care efficiency and quality. Those who demonstrated higher acceptance and more extensive utilization reported that the solution was more valuable in enhancing individualized care efficiency and quality.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the interplay between clinicians' and patients' acceptance, utilization, and perceived clinical value of a digital outpatient solution in diabetes specialist outpatient care. Our findings suggest that when clinicians and patients understand why and how digital solutions are used, such solutions can enhance care efficiency and quality, contributing to sustainable health care. Future research should aim to gain an in-depth understanding of clinicians' and patients' acceptance, as well as the effectiveness of change management strategies when implementing digital outpatient solutions in diabetes specialist outpatient care.