• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

3 项脑卒中量表对检测大脑大血管闭塞的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Diagnostic accuracy of 3-item stroke scale for detection of cerebral large vessel occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Physiology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Sep;83:114-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.07.004. Epub 2024 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2024.07.004
PMID:39003928
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prompt identification of large vessel occlusion (LVO) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is crucial for expedited endovascular therapy (EVT) and improved patient outcomes. Prehospital stroke scales, such as the 3-Item Stroke Scale (3I-SS), could be beneficial in detecting LVO in suspected patients. This meta-analysis evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of 3I-SS for LVO detection in AIS.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases until February 2024 with no time and language restrictions. Prehospital and in-hospital studies reporting diagnostic accuracy were included. Review articles, studies without reported 3I-SS cut-offs, and studies lacking the required data were excluded. Pooled effect sizes, including area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive and negative likelihood ratios (PLR and NLR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were included in the present meta-analysis. A 3I-SS score of 2 or higher demonstrated sensitivity of 76% (95% CI: 52%-90%) and specificity of 74% (95% CI: 57%-86%) as the optimal cut-off, with an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.78-0.84). DOR, PLR, and NLR, were 9 (95% CI: 5-15), 2.9 (95% CI: 2.0-4.3) and 0.32 (95% CI: 0.17-0.61), respectively. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the analyses' robustness in suspected to stroke patients, anterior circulation LVO, assessment by paramedics, and pre-hospital settings. Meta-regression analyses pinpointed LVO definition (anterior circulation, posterior circulation) and patient setting (suspected stroke, confirmed stroke) as potential sources of heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

3I-SS demonstrates good diagnostic accuracy in identifying LVO stroke and may be valuable in the prompt identification of patients for direct transfer to comprehensive stroke centers.

摘要

背景

急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)中及时识别大血管闭塞(LVO)对于加速血管内治疗(EVT)和改善患者预后至关重要。院前卒中量表,如 3 项卒中量表(3I-SS),在疑似患者中检测 LVO 可能是有益的。本荟萃分析评估了 3I-SS 在 AIS 中检测 LVO 的诊断准确性。

方法

系统检索 Medline、Embase、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库,检索时间截至 2024 年 2 月,无时间和语言限制。纳入报告诊断准确性的院前和院内研究。排除综述文章、未报告 3I-SS 截断值的研究以及缺乏所需数据的研究。计算汇总效应量,包括曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感度、特异度、诊断比值比(DOR)、阳性和阴性似然比(PLR 和 NLR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

本荟萃分析纳入 22 项研究。3I-SS 评分≥2 分作为最佳截断值时,其敏感度为 76%(95%CI:52%-90%),特异度为 74%(95%CI:57%-86%),AUC 为 0.81(95%CI:0.78-0.84)。DOR、PLR 和 NLR 分别为 9(95%CI:5-15)、2.9(95%CI:2.0-4.3)和 0.32(95%CI:0.17-0.61)。敏感性分析证实了该分析在疑似卒中患者、前循环 LVO、急救人员评估和院前环境中的稳健性。Meta 回归分析指出,LVO 定义(前循环、后循环)和患者环境(疑似卒中、确诊卒中)是异质性的潜在来源。

结论

3I-SS 对识别 LVO 卒中具有良好的诊断准确性,可能有助于快速识别需要直接转至综合卒中中心的患者。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of 3-item stroke scale for detection of cerebral large vessel occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.3 项脑卒中量表对检测大脑大血管闭塞的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Sep;83:114-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.07.004. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
2
Accuracy of Prediction Instruments for Diagnosing Large Vessel Occlusion in Individuals With Suspected Stroke: A Systematic Review for the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.预测工具诊断疑似卒中患者大血管闭塞准确性的系统评价:2018 年急性缺血性卒中患者早期管理指南的系统评价。
Stroke. 2018 Mar;49(3):e111-e122. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000160. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
3
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
4
Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis Following Endovascular Recanalization for Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.血管内再通治疗大血管闭塞性卒中后动脉内溶栓:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurology. 2025 Aug 12;105(3):e213842. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213842. Epub 2025 Jun 27.
5
Prehospital stroke scales and large vessel occlusion: A systematic review.院前卒中量表与大血管闭塞:系统评价。
Acta Neurol Scand. 2018 Jul;138(1):24-31. doi: 10.1111/ane.12908. Epub 2018 Feb 11.
6
Endovascular thrombectomy with versus without intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.急性缺血性卒中血管内血栓切除术联合与不联合静脉溶栓治疗的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 24;4(4):CD015721. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015721.pub2.
7
Endovascular Thrombectomy for Carotid Pseudo-Occlusion in the Setting of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.血管内血栓切除术治疗急性缺血性脑卒中时的颈动脉假性闭塞:一项比较系统评价和荟萃分析。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024 Sep 9;45(9):1241-1245. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8268.
8
Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.用于识别结直肠癌患者营养不良的营养评估工具的诊断测试准确性:一项系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 May 15;13(4):141-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1673.
9
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) and 2-item (GAD-2) scales for detecting anxiety disorders in adults.用于检测成人焦虑症的广泛性焦虑障碍7项(GAD - 7)和2项(GAD - 2)量表。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD015455. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015455.
10
Intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion; should we cross that bridge? A systematic review and meta-analysis of 36,123 patients.血管内溶栓桥接机械取栓治疗大动脉闭塞性急性缺血性脑卒中;我们是否应该跨越那座桥?一项纳入 36123 例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurol Sci. 2022 Nov;43(11):6243-6269. doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-06283-6. Epub 2022 Jul 23.