Duelund Nick, Nisted Ivan, Jørgensen Marit Eika, Heegaard Steffen, Jensen Hanne
Queen Ingrids Healthcare Center, Nuuk, Greenland.
Greenland Center of Health Research, Institute of Health and Nature, Ilisimatusarfik University of Greenland, Nuuk, Greenland.
Acta Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar;103(2):162-170. doi: 10.1111/aos.16740. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
To estimate the prevalence of amblyopia and refractive errors among 6-year-old children in Greenland and to assess the impact of incorporating autorefraction, stereoacuity and near visual acuity testing into vision screening.
In this cross-sectional study, 517 children (238 girls and 279 boys) from 21 locations in Greenland were screened using HOTV charts for distance and near visual acuity (VA), stereoacuity test and non-cycloplegic autorefraction. Referral criteria for further ophthalmological examination included a VA of ≥0.2 logMAR on the worse-seeing eye or an interocular VA difference of ≥2 lines.
Initial screening identified amblyopia (defined as VA of ≥0.3 logMAR) in 7% (unilateral) and 3% (bilateral) of children. However, subsequent ophthalmological examinations confirmed amblyopia in under 40% of referrals. Significant interocular VA differences were found in 9%. The prevalence of refractive errors at the screening was 3% for myopia (≤-0.5 dioptres), 10% for hyperopia (>+2.0 dioptres) and 14% for astigmatism (≤-1.00 dioptres), while the corresponding prevalences at the ophthalmological examination were 4% for myopia, 8% for hyperopia and 6% for astigmatism. Combining screening measurements increased the positive predictive values, thereby enhancing screening accuracy. Specifically, the incorporation of autorefraction or stereoacuity with distance VA demonstrated to be the most effective combination. Six percent of the children were prescribed glasses after the screening procedure.
This study provides the first visual profile of Greenlandic schoolchildren. Incorporating autorefraction, stereoacuity and near visual acuity in vision screenings enhanced the efficacy of detection of vision anomalies. Although this may lead to more false positives, accurate screening is crucial in regions with limited ophthalmological resources.
评估格陵兰6岁儿童弱视和屈光不正的患病率,并评估在视力筛查中加入自动验光、立体视锐度和近视力测试的影响。
在这项横断面研究中,使用HOTV视力表对来自格陵兰21个地点的517名儿童(238名女孩和279名男孩)进行远视力和近视力、立体视锐度测试及非散瞳自动验光筛查。进一步眼科检查的转诊标准包括较差眼的视力≥0.2 logMAR或双眼视力差异≥2行。
初步筛查发现7%(单眼)和3%(双眼)的儿童患有弱视(定义为视力≥0.3 logMAR)。然而,随后的眼科检查仅确诊了不到40%转诊儿童的弱视。9%的儿童存在显著的双眼视力差异。筛查时近视(≤-0.5屈光度)的患病率为3%,远视(>+2.0屈光度)为10%,散光(≤-1.00屈光度)为14%,而眼科检查时相应的患病率分别为4%、8%和6%。综合筛查测量提高了阳性预测值,从而提高了筛查准确性。具体而言,将自动验光或立体视锐度与远视力相结合是最有效的组合。6%的儿童在筛查程序后被开了眼镜。
本研究提供了格陵兰学童的首个视力概况。在视力筛查中加入自动验光、立体视锐度和近视力可提高视力异常检测的效果。尽管这可能会导致更多假阳性,但在眼科资源有限的地区,准确筛查至关重要。