Wang F, Chen D L, Wang Z X, He Y, Li J, Zhang S Z, Chen G, Xu J M, Yuan X L, Zhang Y Q, Xu R H
Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Department of Medical Oncology, East Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai 200120, China.
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Jul 25;27(7):718-725. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240323-00107.
To analyze the current adoption of palliative care by patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in China. From 1 March 2023 to 30 June 2023, a questionnaire survey was conducted by random sampling. An exclusive research platform for the Blue Book on Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. An online questionnaire was sent to medical oncologists (including chief physicians, associate chief physicians, attending physicians and residents) in general hospitals and oncology hospitals in four major regions of East, Central, South and Northeast China. The questionnaire contained 28 questions requesting basic information about doctors, the number of patients with mCRC, the status of treatment from first to fourth line and beyond, points concerning treatment of pain in patients with mCRC, and expectations for the future. A medical team was responsible for the quality control of data collected, whereas statisticians performed the data cleaning and sorting and statistical analysis. A total of 300 clinical questionnaires were collected, including 217 (72%) from doctors in general hospitals and 83 (28%) from doctors in oncology hospitals. Senior physicians (including associate chief physicians and chief physicians) accounted for 65% of the respondents, attending physicians 30%, and residents 5%. Within 3 months (average for each month), 46.4±26.6% patients were diagnosed with recurrent or unresectable mCRC by each physician, 51.6±26.8% of the patients being in cancer hospitals and 44.4±26.3% in general hospitals. One hundred percent of patients receiving first-line treatment received palliative care, as did 80.3% of those receiving second-line treatment, 58.2% of those receiving third-line treatment, and 35.1% of those receiving ≥fourth-line treatment. The primary factor governing selection of first-line treatment was guideline recommendations, whereas comorbidities and the patients' physical status dictated second line to fourth line treatment. Standard first-line treatment was administered to 93.8% of eligible patients, standard second-line treatment to 94.3%; and standard third-line treatment to 73.5%. First-line therapy included targeted therapy in 63.6% of patients and immunotherapy in 2.8%; second-line therapy included targeted therapy in 63.0% of patients and immunotherapy in 2.0%; third-line therapy included targeted therapy in 59.2% of patients and immunotherapy in 2.2%; and fourth-line therapy included targeted therapy in 48.7% of patients and immunotherapy in 3.1%. First-line treatment lasted an average of 9.6 months, second-line treatment 6.7 months, third-line treatment 4.9 months, and fourth-line treatment 3.7 months. More than 70% of the patients maintained a good quality of life after receiving first and second-line treatment and more than 60% of them had ECOG performance scores of 0-1. After receiving third- and fourth-line treatment, 50%-60% of patients maintained a good quality of life and 40%-50% of them maintained ECOG performance scores of 0-1. The survey also revealed that the main deficiencies in treatment were limited effectiveness of third-line treatment, insufficient availability and opportunity for clinical research, popularity of new drugs or new drug combination strategies, and limited channels for participation in multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment. Clinicians reported looking forward to participating in more clinical research on new drugs, hearing about the experience of experts in the field, and discovery of new targets and new drugs that increased the options for posterior line treatment of colorectal cancer. This report objectively summarizes the current situation, treatment difficulties, and expectations of frontline physicians concerning management of mCRC, thus providing a basis for decision-making and future direction for the diagnosis and research on treatment of mCRC.
分析中国不可切除转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者目前姑息治疗的采用情况。2023年3月1日至2023年6月30日,通过随机抽样进行问卷调查。这是一个转移性结直肠癌临床诊疗蓝皮书专属研究平台。向华东、华中、华南和东北四大区域的综合医院和肿瘤医院的医学肿瘤学家(包括主任医师、副主任医师、主治医师和住院医师)发送了在线问卷。问卷包含28个问题,询问医生的基本信息、mCRC患者数量、一线至四线及以上的治疗情况、mCRC患者疼痛治疗要点以及对未来的期望。一个医疗团队负责所收集数据的质量控制,而统计人员进行数据清理、整理和统计分析。共收集到300份临床问卷,其中217份(72%)来自综合医院医生,83份(28%)来自肿瘤医院医生。高级医师(包括副主任医师和主任医师)占受访者的65%,主治医师占30%,住院医师占5%。每位医生在3个月内(每月平均)诊断出46.4±26.6%的患者患有复发性或不可切除的mCRC,其中51.6±26.8%的患者在癌症医院,44.4±26.3%的患者在综合医院。接受一线治疗的患者100%接受了姑息治疗,接受二线治疗的患者中这一比例为80.3%,接受三线治疗的患者中为58.2%,接受≥四线治疗的患者中为35.1%。决定一线治疗选择的主要因素是指南推荐,而合并症和患者身体状况决定二线至四线治疗。93.8%的符合条件患者接受了标准一线治疗,94.3%接受了标准二线治疗,73.5%接受了标准三线治疗。一线治疗中63.6%的患者采用靶向治疗,2.8%采用免疫治疗;二线治疗中63.0%的患者采用靶向治疗,2.0%采用免疫治疗;三线治疗中59.2%的患者采用靶向治疗,2.2%采用免疫治疗;四线治疗中48.7%的患者采用靶向治疗,3.1%采用免疫治疗。一线治疗平均持续9.6个月,二线治疗6.7个月,三线治疗4.9个月,四线治疗3.7个月。超过70%的患者在接受一线和二线治疗后保持良好生活质量,其中超过60%的患者ECOG体能状态评分为0 - 1。在接受三线和四线治疗后,50% - 60%的患者保持良好生活质量,40% - 50%的患者保持ECOG体能状态评分为0 - 1。调查还显示,治疗的主要不足在于三线治疗效果有限、临床研究的可及性和机会不足、新药或新药联合策略的普及程度以及参与多学科诊断和治疗的渠道有限。临床医生表示期待参与更多新药临床研究,了解该领域专家的经验,以及发现增加结直肠癌后线治疗选择的新靶点和新药。本报告客观总结了mCRC管理的现状、治疗难点以及一线医生的期望,从而为mCRC诊断和治疗研究的决策和未来方向提供依据。