Bampidis Vasileios, Azimonti Giovanna, Bastos Maria de Lourdes, Christensen Henrik, Durjava Mojca, Dusemund Birgit, Kouba Maryline, López-Alonso Marta, López Puente Secundino, Marcon Francesca, Mayo Baltasar, Pechová Alena, Petkova Mariana, Ramos Fernando, Villa Roberto Edoardo, Woutersen Ruud, Yurkov Andrey, Anguita Montserrat, Casanova Jordi Ortuño, Innocenti Matteo L, Brozzi Rosella
EFSA J. 2024 Jul 12;22(7):e8847. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8847. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of CNCM I-1079 as a zootechnical feed additive for dogs and all other Canidae. The additive is intended for use in feed for dogs and all other Canidae at a proposed minimum inclusion level of 1 × 10 CFU per kg of complete feed. is considered by EFSA to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety approach to safety assessment. Since the identity of the active agent has been clearly established and no concerns are expected from other components of the product, the additive is considered safe for the target species. Since the additive is intended to be used only in feed for dogs and other non-food-producing animals, an assessment of the safety for the consumer and the environment is not needed. The non-coated form of the additive was shown to be non-irritant to skin and eyes. No conclusion can be drawn on the eye irritation potential of the coated form of the additive due to the lack of data. The additive in both forms, should be considered a skin and respiratory sensitiser and any exposure through skin and respiratory tract is considered a risk. The Panel was not in the position to conclude on the efficacy of CNCM I-1079 at the proposed conditions of use.
应欧盟委员会的要求,欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)被要求就CNCM I-1079作为犬类及所有其他犬科动物的动物营养饲料添加剂的安全性和有效性发表科学意见。该添加剂拟以每千克全价饲料1×10 CFU的建议最低添加量用于犬类及所有其他犬科动物的饲料中。欧洲食品安全局认为其适用于安全性评估的合格假定方法。由于活性成分的身份已明确确定,且预计产品的其他成分不会引起担忧,因此该添加剂被认为对目标物种是安全的。由于该添加剂仅拟用于犬类和其他非食用动物的饲料中,因此无需对消费者和环境的安全性进行评估。该添加剂的未包衣形式对皮肤和眼睛无刺激性。由于缺乏数据,无法就该添加剂包衣形式的眼刺激潜力得出结论。两种形式的添加剂均应被视为皮肤和呼吸道致敏剂,通过皮肤和呼吸道的任何接触都被视为有风险。专家小组无法就CNCM I-1079在建议使用条件下的有效性得出结论。