• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

危机中的从众行为:来自中国新冠疫情的证据

Conformity behavior in crises: evidence from the COVID-19 epidemic in China.

作者信息

Yao Yujiao, Liu Shanshan, Chen Gaoyu, Yang Yang, Yang Jiaxin

机构信息

School of International Studies, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

School of Business Administration, Faculty of Business Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 28;15:1428075. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1428075. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1428075
PMID:39006544
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11239545/
Abstract

Once a mass health crisis breaks out, it causes concern among whole societies. Thus, understanding the individual's behavior in response to such events is key in government crisis management. From the perspective of social influence theory, this study adopts the empirical research method to collect data information in February 2020 through online survey, with a view to comprehensively describe the individuals'conformity behavior during the COVID-19 outbreak in China. The individual's conformity behavior and new influencing factors were identified. The results revealed that affective risk perception, cognitive risk perception, and individual risk knowledge had a positive significant impact on normative influence. Affective risk perception and individual risk knowledge had a positive significant on informative influence. Cognitive risk perception did not significantly impact informative influence. Informative influence and normative influence had a positive effect on conformity behavior. These results have significant implications for the management behavior of the government.

摘要

一旦大规模健康危机爆发,就会引起全社会的关注。因此,了解个体对这类事件的反应行为是政府危机管理的关键。从社会影响理论的角度出发,本研究采用实证研究方法,于2020年2月通过在线调查收集数据信息,旨在全面描述中国新冠疫情爆发期间个体的从众行为。识别了个体的从众行为和新的影响因素。结果显示,情感风险感知、认知风险感知和个体风险知识对规范影响有正向显著影响。情感风险感知和个体风险知识对信息影响有正向显著影响。认知风险感知对信息影响没有显著影响。信息影响和规范影响对从众行为有正向作用。这些结果对政府的管理行为具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f0b/11239545/1ae63440716e/fpsyg-15-1428075-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f0b/11239545/7f4c6ae1bfd5/fpsyg-15-1428075-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f0b/11239545/1ae63440716e/fpsyg-15-1428075-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f0b/11239545/7f4c6ae1bfd5/fpsyg-15-1428075-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f0b/11239545/1ae63440716e/fpsyg-15-1428075-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Conformity behavior in crises: evidence from the COVID-19 epidemic in China.危机中的从众行为:来自中国新冠疫情的证据
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 28;15:1428075. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1428075. eCollection 2024.
2
Research on older people's health information search behavior based on risk perception in social networks-A case study in China during COVID-19.基于社交网络中风险感知的老年人健康信息搜索行为研究——以新冠疫情期间中国为例
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 10;10:946742. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.946742. eCollection 2022.
3
Risk Perception and Depression in Public Health Crises: Evidence from the COVID-19 Crisis in China.公共卫生危机中的风险感知与抑郁:来自中国新冠肺炎危机的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 7;17(16):5728. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165728.
4
The effect of cognition and affect on preventive behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study in China.认知和情感对 COVID-19 大流行期间预防行为的影响:中国的一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 14;21(1):722. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10784-y.
5
Influencing factors for public risk perception of COVID-19 --perspective of the pandemic whole life cycle.新冠疫情公众风险认知的影响因素——基于疫情全生命周期的视角
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022 Jan;67:102693. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102693. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
6
Trends and Factors Associated With Risk Perception, Anxiety, and Behavior From the Early Outbreak Period to the Controlled Period of COVID-19 Epidemic: Four Cross-Sectional Online Surveys in China in 2020.2020 年中国四次新冠肺炎疫情爆发早期至控制期的横断面在线调查:风险感知、焦虑和行为的趋势及相关因素。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 18;9:768867. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.768867. eCollection 2021.
7
Perception-based influence factors of intention to adopt COVID-19 epidemic prevention in China.基于感知的中国 COVID-19 疫情防控采纳意愿影响因素。
Environ Res. 2020 Nov;190:109995. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109995. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
8
How does social presence influence public crisis information sharing intention? Situational pressure perspective.社会临场感如何影响公众危机信息共享意愿?情境压力视角。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 11;11:1124876. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1124876. eCollection 2023.
9
China's Public Health Policies in Response to COVID-19: From an "Authoritarian" Perspective.中国应对 COVID-19 的公共卫生政策:从“威权主义”的角度。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 15;9:756677. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.756677. eCollection 2021.
10
Insights from China: understanding the impact of community resilience and government trust in psychological resilience and anxiety during COVID-19.中国的启示:了解社区韧性和政府信任对 COVID-19 期间心理韧性和焦虑的影响。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 28;11:1298269. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1298269. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of mortality salience on quantified self behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic.死亡凸显对新冠疫情期间自我量化行为的影响。
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Oct;180:110972. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110972. Epub 2021 May 4.
2
Unpacking the black box: How to promote citizen engagement through government social media during the COVID-19 crisis.打开黑匣子:如何在新冠疫情危机期间通过政府社交媒体促进公民参与。
Comput Human Behav. 2020 Sep;110:106380. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106380. Epub 2020 Apr 12.
3
The novel coronavirus (COVID-2019) outbreak: Amplification of public health consequences by media exposure.
新型冠状病毒(COVID-2019)爆发:媒体接触对公共卫生后果的放大。
Health Psychol. 2020 May;39(5):355-357. doi: 10.1037/hea0000875. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
4
Distress and rumor exposure on social media during a campus lockdown.社交媒体在校园封锁期间的困扰和谣言传播。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Oct 31;114(44):11663-11668. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708518114. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
5
A fuzzy set approach to economic crisis, austerity and public health. Part I. European countries' conformity to ideal types during the economic downturn.一种用于经济危机、紧缩政策和公共卫生的模糊集方法。第一部分。经济衰退期间欧洲国家与理想类型的契合度。
Scand J Public Health. 2017 Aug;45(18_suppl):41-47. doi: 10.1177/1403494817706632.
6
The Affective Bases of Risk Perception: Negative Feelings and Stress Mediate the Relationship between Mental Imagery and Risk Perception.风险感知的情感基础:负面情绪和压力介导心理意象与风险感知之间的关系。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 24;7:932. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00932. eCollection 2016.
7
The Tripartite Model of Risk Perception (TRIRISK): Distinguishing Deliberative, Affective, and Experiential Components of Perceived Risk.风险感知三方模型(TRIRISK):区分感知风险的审慎、情感和体验成分
Ann Behav Med. 2016 Oct;50(5):653-663. doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9790-z.
8
H1N1 was not all that scary: uncertainty and stressor appraisals predict anxiety related to a coming viral threat.甲型H1N1流感并非那么可怕:不确定性和应激源评估可预测与即将到来的病毒威胁相关的焦虑情绪。
Stress Health. 2014 Apr;30(2):149-57. doi: 10.1002/smi.2505. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
9
Social influence: compliance and conformity.社会影响:顺从与从众。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:591-621. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015.
10
Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism: a national field experiment.恐惧和愤怒对恐怖主义感知风险的影响:一项全国性实地实验。
Psychol Sci. 2003 Mar;14(2):144-50. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.01433.