• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Turnout Gap in Surveys: Explanations and Solutions.调查中的投票率差距:解释与解决方案
Sociol Methods Res. 2020 Nov;49(4):1133-1162. doi: 10.1177/0049124118769085. Epub 2018 May 6.
2
The Conditional Effects of Health on Voter Turnout.健康对选民投票率的条件效应。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2021 Jun 1;46(3):409-433. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8893529.
3
Americans discount the effect of friction on voter turnout.美国人低估了摩擦对投票率的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Aug 23;119(34):e2206072119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2206072119. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
4
The downstream consequences of long waits: How lines at the precinct depress future turnout.长时间等待的下游后果:选区的排队如何降低未来的投票率。
Elect Stud. 2021 Jun;71:102188. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102188. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
5
Chronic health conditions and voter turnout: Results from the 2012 United States presidential election.慢性健康状况与选民投票率:2012年美国总统大选的结果
World Med Health Policy. 2021 Jun;13(2):313-327. doi: 10.1002/wmh3.454. Epub 2021 May 21.
6
Communicating safety precautions can help maintain in-person voter turnout during a pandemic.宣传安全预防措施有助于在疫情期间维持亲自投票的选民投票率。
Elect Stud. 2022 Feb;75:102421. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102421. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
7
The relationship between the lifestyle health index and voter turnout during the 2020 United States presidential election in the context of regional cultures.在区域文化背景下,2020年美国总统大选期间生活方式健康指数与选民投票率之间的关系。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2024 Aug 15;8:100534. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100534. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
Increasing Voter Participation Through Health Care-Based Voter Registration.通过医疗保健为选民登记提高选民参与度。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Jun 7;5(6):e241563. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1563.
9
Changes and continuities in the determinants of older adults' voter turnout 1952-1996.1952年至1996年美国老年人投票率决定因素的变化与延续性
Gerontologist. 2001 Dec;41(6):805-18. doi: 10.1093/geront/41.6.805.
10
How did absentee voting affect the 2020 U.S. election?缺席投票如何影响2020年美国大选?
Sci Adv. 2021 Dec 24;7(52):eabk1755. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abk1755. Epub 2021 Dec 22.

引用本文的文献

1
How, and For Whom, Does Higher Education Increase Voting?高等教育如何以及为谁增加投票率?
Res High Educ. 2023 Jun;64(4):574-597. doi: 10.1007/s11162-022-09717-4. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
2
Leveraging Auxiliary Information on Marginal Distributions in Nonignorable Models for Item and Unit Nonresponse.在项目和单元无回答的不可忽略模型中利用边际分布的辅助信息。
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2021 Apr;184(2):643-662. doi: 10.1111/rssa.12635. Epub 2021 Jan 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Household survey, individual interview, and clinical examination to determine prevalance of heart disease.通过家庭调查、个人访谈和临床检查来确定心脏病的患病率。
Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1957 Sep;47(9):1131-40. doi: 10.2105/ajph.47.9.1131.
2
On the measurement of prevalence of arthritis and rheumatism from interview data.基于访谈数据对关节炎和风湿病患病率的测量。
J Chronic Dis. 1956 Feb;3(2):134-9. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(56)90109-6.
3
Overreporting voting: why it happens and why it matters.过度报告投票:为什么会发生以及为什么重要。
Public Opin Q. 2001 Spring;65(1):22-44.

调查中的投票率差距:解释与解决方案

The Turnout Gap in Surveys: Explanations and Solutions.

作者信息

DeBell Matthew, Krosnick Jon A, Gera Katie, Yeager David S, McDonald Michael P

机构信息

Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.

出版信息

Sociol Methods Res. 2020 Nov;49(4):1133-1162. doi: 10.1177/0049124118769085. Epub 2018 May 6.

DOI:10.1177/0049124118769085
PMID:39006982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11244654/
Abstract

Postelection surveys regularly overestimate voter turnout by 10 points or more. This article provides the first comprehensive documentation of the turnout gap in three major ongoing surveys (the General Social Survey, Current Population Survey, and American National Election Studies), evaluates explanations for it, interprets its significance, and suggests means to continue evaluating and improving survey measurements of turnout. Accuracy was greater in face-to-face than telephone interviews, consistent with the notion that the former mode engages more respondent effort with less social desirability bias. Accuracy was greater when respondents were asked about the most recent election, consistent with the hypothesis that forgetting creates errors. Question wordings designed to minimize source confusion and social desirability bias improved accuracy. Rates of reported turnout were lower with proxy reports than with self-reports, which may suggest greater accuracy of proxy reports. People who do not vote are less likely to participate in surveys than voters are.

摘要

选举后的调查经常将选民投票率高估10个百分点或更多。本文首次全面记录了三项主要正在进行的调查(综合社会调查、当前人口调查和美国全国选举研究)中的投票率差距,评估了对此的解释,解读了其重要性,并提出了继续评估和改进投票率调查测量方法的手段。面对面访谈的准确性高于电话访谈,这与前一种方式能让受访者付出更多努力且社会期望偏差较小的观点一致。当询问受访者最近一次选举的情况时,准确性更高,这与遗忘会产生误差的假设一致。旨在尽量减少来源混淆和社会期望偏差的问题措辞提高了准确性。代理报告的投票率低于自我报告,这可能表明代理报告的准确性更高。不投票的人比投票者参与调查的可能性更小。