• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

过度报告投票:为什么会发生以及为什么重要。

Overreporting voting: why it happens and why it matters.

出版信息

Public Opin Q. 2001 Spring;65(1):22-44.

PMID:11264053
Abstract

The key to understanding why people overreport is that those who are under the most pressure to vote are the ones most likely to misrepresent their behavior when they fail to do so. Among all nonvoters, the most likely to overreport are the more educated, partisan, and religious, and those who have been contacted and asked to vote for a candidate. The greater the concentration of African-American and Latino nonvoters in a district, the greater the probability of overreporting in those districts, both among those in the relevant minority group and among white Anglos. White nonvoters are more likely to overreport in the Deep South than elsewhere. Overreporting matters: using reported votes in place of validated votes substantially distorts standard multivariate explanations of voting, increasing the apparent importance of independent variables that are related in the same direction to both overreporting and voting and sharply decreasing the apparent importance of independent variables related in opposing directions to those two variables.

摘要

理解人们为何过度报告的关键在于,那些承受最大投票压力的人,在未能投票时最有可能歪曲自己的行为。在所有未投票者中,最有可能过度报告的是那些受教育程度更高、党派偏见更强、宗教信仰更虔诚的人,以及那些被联系并被要求投票给某个候选人的人。在一个地区,非裔美国人和拉丁裔非选民的集中程度越高,这些地区过度报告的可能性就越大,无论是在相关少数群体中还是在白人盎格鲁撒克逊人中都是如此。在深南地区,白人非选民更有可能过度报告。过度报告很重要:用报告的选票代替经过验证的选票,会极大地扭曲投票的标准多元解释,增加与过度报告和投票都呈相同方向相关的自变量的明显重要性,同时大幅降低与这两个变量呈相反方向相关的自变量的明显重要性。

相似文献

1
Overreporting voting: why it happens and why it matters.过度报告投票:为什么会发生以及为什么重要。
Public Opin Q. 2001 Spring;65(1):22-44.
2
The politics of abortion in the House of Representatives in 1976.1976年众议院关于堕胎的政治情况。
Mich Law Rev. 1979 Aug;77(7):1790-827.
3
Facts versus values: why legislators vote against injury control laws.事实与价值观:立法者为何投票反对伤害控制法。
J Trauma. 1993 Nov;35(5):786-92; discussion 792-3.
4
Contraceptive use, pregnancy and fertility patterns among single American women in their 20s.20多岁美国单身女性的避孕措施使用情况、怀孕及生育模式。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1985 Jan-Feb;17(1):10-9.
5
Evidence summary: why is access to dental care for frail elderly people worse than for other groups?证据总结:为什么体弱老年人获得牙科保健的机会比其他群体差?
Br Dent J. 2010 Feb 13;208(3):119-22. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.103.
6
On improving the efficiency of tensor voting.关于提高张量投票效率的研究。
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2011 Nov;33(11):2215-28. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2011.23.
7
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
8
The genetics of voting: an Australian twin study.投票的遗传学:一项澳大利亚双胞胎研究。
Behav Genet. 2007 May;37(3):435-48. doi: 10.1007/s10519-006-9138-8. Epub 2007 Jan 13.
9
Who Votes by Mail?: A Dynamic Model of the Individual-Level Consequences of Voting-by-Mail Systems.谁通过邮件投票?:投票邮寄系统对个人层面影响的动态模型。
Public Opin Q. 2001 Summer;65(2):178-97. doi: 10.1086/322196.
10
Beyond the Sum of Parts: Voting with Groups of Dependent Entities.超越部分之和:用依存实体组投票。
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2015 Jun;37(6):1134-47. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2014.2363456.

引用本文的文献

1
How Accurate Are Self-reports of Voluntary Association Memberships?自愿加入社团情况的自我报告有多准确?
Sociol Methods Res. 2021 May;50(2):866-900. doi: 10.1177/0049124118799384. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
2
The Turnout Gap in Surveys: Explanations and Solutions.调查中的投票率差距:解释与解决方案
Sociol Methods Res. 2020 Nov;49(4):1133-1162. doi: 10.1177/0049124118769085. Epub 2018 May 6.
3
Unveiling the role of political education for political participation in China.揭示政治教育在中国政治参与中的作用。
Heliyon. 2024 May 14;10(10):e31258. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31258. eCollection 2024 May 30.
4
Participant Role Behavior in Cyberbullying: an Examination of Moral Disengagement Among College Students.网络欺凌中的参与者角色行为:大学生道德脱离研究
Int J Bullying Prev. 2022 Aug 1:1-13. doi: 10.1007/s42380-022-00137-7.
5
Ideology and compliance with health guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative perspective.新冠疫情期间的意识形态与对健康指南的遵守:比较视角
Soc Sci Q. 2021 Sep;102(5):2106-2123. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.13035. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
6
Malawi at the Crossroads: Does the Fear of Contracting COVID-19 Affect the Propensity to Vote?马拉维处于十字路口:对感染新冠病毒的恐惧会影响投票倾向吗?
Eur J Dev Res. 2022;34(1):409-431. doi: 10.1057/s41287-020-00353-1. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
7
Asking about Sexual Identity on the National Health Interview Survey: Does Mode Matter?在国家健康访谈调查中询问性取向:方式重要吗?
J Off Stat. 2019;35(4):807-833. doi: 10.2478/jos-2019-0034.
8
Lies, Damned Lies, and Survey Self-Reports? Identity as a Cause of Measurement Bias.谎言、该死的谎言与调查自我报告?身份认同作为测量偏差的一个原因。
Soc Psychol Q. 2016 Dec;79(4):333-354. doi: 10.1177/0190272516628298. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
9
Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior.对照现实世界行为验证案例和联合调查实验。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Feb 24;112(8):2395-400. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1416587112. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
10
Voting at 16: Turnout and the quality of vote choice.16岁投票:投票率与投票选择质量
Elect Stud. 2012 Jun;31(2):372-383. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2012.01.007.