Department of Surgery, Shanghai Sixth Peoples Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Jul 15;39(1):108. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04683-y.
Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) is an innovative surgical approach enabling the direct visualization of the fistula tract structure. This study aims to assess the efficacy of VAAFT in comparison with that of traditional surgical methods and explore potential risk factors contributing to fistula recurrence to provide new recommendations for surgical selection.
Information was collected from 100 patients with complex anal fistula (CAF) in our hospital who underwent surgical treatment from January 2021 to January 2023. We compared the baseline information and surgical outcomes of two groups, analyzed the risk factors for fistula recurrence by using logistic regression analysis, and conducted further exploration by using the body mass index.
Equal numbers of patients underwent VAAFT and traditional surgeries, and no significant differences in baseline information were observed. Patients who received VAAFT experienced less intraoperative bleeding (15.5 (14.0-20.0) vs. 32.0 (25.0-36.0)), shorter hospital stays (2.0 (2.0-2.5) vs. 3.0 (3.0-3.5)), reduced postoperative pain and wound discharge, but longer operative times (43.3 ± 6.9 vs. 35.0 (31.5-40.0)) compared with patients who underwent traditional surgeries. No significant differences in recurrence rates were found three and six months after operation (the p-values were 0.790 and 0.806, respectively). However, the Wexner scores of the VAAFT group were significantly low in the first follow-up (0 (0-1.0) vs. 2.0 (1.0-2.0)). Postoperative recurrence of fistulas may be associated with obesity (p-value = 0.040), especially in patients undergoing traditional surgeries (p-value = 0.036).
VAAFT offers advantages, such as less pain, less trauma, and faster recovery, compared with traditional surgical treatment. Obese patients with CAF are prone to recurrence, and we recommend that they undergo VAAFT treatment rather than traditional surgeries.
视频辅助肛瘘治疗(VAAFT)是一种创新的手术方法,可直接观察肛瘘的结构。本研究旨在评估 VAAFT 与传统手术方法的疗效,并探讨导致肛瘘复发的潜在危险因素,为手术选择提供新的建议。
收集了 2021 年 1 月至 2023 年 1 月在我院接受手术治疗的 100 例复杂性肛瘘(CAF)患者的信息。我们比较了两组患者的基线信息和手术结果,通过 logistic 回归分析,分析肛瘘复发的危险因素,并进一步通过体重指数进行探索。
VAAFT 组和传统手术组的患者数量相等,基线信息无显著差异。接受 VAAFT 治疗的患者术中出血量更少(15.5(14.0-20.0)比 32.0(25.0-36.0)),住院时间更短(2.0(2.0-2.5)比 3.0(3.0-3.5)),术后疼痛和伤口分泌物减少,但手术时间更长(43.3±6.9 比 35.0(31.5-40.0))。术后 3 个月和 6 个月复发率无显著差异(p 值分别为 0.790 和 0.806)。然而,VAAFT 组在第一次随访时的 Wexner 评分明显较低(0(0-1.0)比 2.0(1.0-2.0))。肛瘘术后复发可能与肥胖有关(p 值=0.040),尤其是接受传统手术的患者(p 值=0.036)。
与传统手术治疗相比,VAAFT 具有疼痛少、创伤小、恢复快等优点。肥胖的 CAF 患者易复发,我们建议他们接受 VAAFT 治疗而不是传统手术。